The acquired cohort contains 5 official alert references published from 2009-11-06 to 2017-06-09. This page compares 4 selected, distinct product descriptions, including toy car with battery charger, radio-controlled helicopter - q- exceed, radio controlled toy car. The other 1 records still contribute to the cohort counts but are not displayed: descriptions may repeat, lack the display inputs, or fall outside the eight-description display limit. The recorded risks raise separate evidence questions about insulation, plug interfaces. Compare the product features and dated findings below before scoping an investigation. These historical observations do not determine your product’s compliance or a market failure rate.
Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.
Dated official observations
Compare the product features and reported failure mechanism
The source wording below describes the reported case at that time. Read each complete report before using it in an investigation.
Toy car with battery charger · A12/0746/17
Report published 2017-06-09 · notifying country Hungary · reported origin People's Republic of China
Reported product description
Blue, remote controlled toy car with green flashing wheels. Supplied with 3 AA batteries and a battery charger which plugs into a mains socket outlet (model number XL-368250). Packaging: cardboard box with transparent window. [1]
Reported risk explanation
null The electrical insulation of the battery charger is not sufficient. Live parts can be touched when connecting the charger to mains since the dimensions of the plug are not suitable. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive and the relevant European standard EN 60335. [1]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: UnknownType of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 13/04/2017 [1]
Report published 2010-06-05 · notifying country United Kingdom · reported origin People's Republic of China
Reported product description
Radio-controlled helicopter and AC/DC adaptor in cardboard box with pictures and plastic window. [2]
Reported risk explanation
The mains adaptor poses a risk of electric shock because:1. the internal insulation between the input and output circuits is not sufficient; 2. internal connections rely upon solder to maintain their position;3. the dimensions of the live and neutral pins are incorrect.The product does not comply with the Low Voltage Directive (LVD), the relevant European standard EN 61558 and the relevant national standards. [2]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Voluntary withdrawal from the market.Date of entry into force: Unknown [2]
Report published 2010-01-15 · notifying country Hungary · reported origin People's Republic of China
Reported product description
The toy includes: a plastic battery-operated radio controlled car (operating frequency: 27 MHz); an adaptor without marking; a (radio control) remote control; a battery unit (HUANYU NI-CD 4*AA700 mAh 4,8 V); Technical parameters: toy car power supply: 700 mAh, 4.8 V battery unit; remote control: 2 x 1.5 V-os (AA )dry battery; adaptor: input: AC 220-240 V; 50/60Hz; output: DC 4.8 V 180 mA, Class II [3]
Reported risk explanation
The product poses a risk of electric shock because the length of the insulation of the plug pins of the mains adaptor is not sufficient.The product does not comply with the Low Voltage Directive (LVD) and the relevant European standard EN 60335. [3]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: OtherCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal from the market and recall from consumers ordered by the authorities.Date of entry into force: Unknown [3]
Report published 2009-11-06 · notifying country Hungary · reported origin People's Republic of China
Reported product description
Toy electronic keyboard with black cover. On the front panel in addition to the 37 keys there are colourful buttons for various effects. On the back panel there are the power supply and microphone inlet. On the bottom there is the battery compartment for 4 AA batteries. Main components: plug (220~240 V); mains supply cable (A RVVB PVC INSULATED WIRE 300/300 V); supply unit without any marking. [4]
Reported risk explanation
The product poses a risk of electric shock because the insulation is not sufficient between the accessible and live parts, the mains cable is not properly fixed to the terminals of the plug, the cable is not protected against pulling force.The product does not comply with the Low Voltage Directive and the relevant European standards EN 62115 and EN 60065. [4]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Voluntary withdrawal from the market by the importer.Date of entry into force: Unknown [4]
5 distinct official alert references, published between 2009-11-06 and 2017-06-09. Counts describe the acquired reports, with no market denominator.
Report year
Recorded alerts
2009
1
2010
2
2012
1
2017
1
Recorded risk labels within this evidence task
Label combinations are source facts within one comparison; they do not create separate guides with identical preparation tasks.
Electric shock: 4 recorded references
Electric shock, Fire: 1 recorded references
Source selection, exclusions and calculation method
Filter the acquired, completely parsed English weekly XML releases. Deduplicate official alert references. Group by product category and the complete set of conditional evidence-question topics supported by actual risk text. Risk-label combinations remain recorded cohort facets and do not create buyer intents. Brand, product name, model, origin, notifying country, measurement-only changes and different wording of the same questions do not create intents. Unrecognized mechanisms stay internal for enrichment. Count report years and notifying countries deterministically. Display at most eight newest descriptions with at least 40 characters after whitespace normalization, nonempty reported measures and distinct casefolded descriptions; break date ties by official identifier. All cohort records count even if their description is shorter or not displayed. This is not a representative sample. Counts concern this acquired corpus only.
One acquired version per official public alert reference. Display at most eight newest distinct product descriptions whose normalized whitespace-collapsed text contains at least 40 characters and has nonempty reported measures; ties sort by official identifier. The complete cohort includes shorter descriptions. This is an explicit display selection, not a representative sample.
4 distinct descriptions displayed; 1 cohort records not displayed. Missing fields: {'measures': 1}.
These are selected, dated enforcement observations in the acquired weekly reports, not a random market sample, market-wide failure rate, proof of current product status, or a determination about your product. Notification country is not a complete sales-market or jurisdiction-coverage field. A quoted legal/standard reference is the report’s statement, not independently verified current law or a mandatory test panel.
Calculation safety-gate-evidence-comparison-10; units recorded alerts; no incidence denominator.
Turn the reported failure mechanism into a scoped investigation
Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.
Power-supply insulation boundaries — what evidence do we have?
If your product uses a mains supply or adapter, identify the actual power-supply architecture, insulation boundaries and accessible parts. Ask a qualified specialist which design evidence and investigation would address the reported shock mechanism for this configuration. No medical-device standard or pass/fail limit is selected from this alert.
Useful evidence: Schematics, adapter/component specifications, ratings, insulation/protection design and configuration-specific existing test evidence.
Plug, socket and connector interfaces — what evidence do we have?
Identify the exact plug/socket or connector configuration, intended country interface and any adapter supplied. Document the interface dimensions, accessible parts and assembly controls for specialist review against current applicable requirements. Do not assume a reported interface failure applies to every configuration.
Can we trace the affected component, formula or design revision across our supplied products?
Compare the reported descriptions with your own identifiers and change records. Treat missing or “Unknown” source fields as unresolved; they do not establish that no action was needed.
Useful evidence: Product identifiers, revision history, supplier/batch traceability and market/operator records.
Who would own an evidence review and any resulting corrective-action decision?
Read the reported measures as historical observations. Establish your own operator roles, sector-specific rules, decision owner and communication responsibilities before adopting another case’s response.
Conditional: Product-risk evidence and operator-role review — Compare the recorded product features and failure mechanism with your product. Confirm the applicable product regime, deciding evidence, operator responsibilities and justified next steps. This does not assume that GPSR or a representative appointment applies to every alert category.
Questions for providers
Which specific product features and reported risk mechanism make these cases relevant or irrelevant to our product?
What current legal, standards or scientific sources support your proposed investigation criteria, and what cannot be concluded from these dated alerts?
Which existing evidence can answer the risk question, what additional work is justified, and who owns any resulting corrective-action decision?
Sources and data dates
Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.
