Stationery: detachable parts — reported risk evidence
The acquired cohort contains 13 official alert references published from 2007-01-26 to 2026-02-06. This page compares 8 selected, distinct product descriptions, including eraser, ballpoint pen, eraser shaped like a pink macaroon. The other 5 records still contribute to the cohort counts but are not displayed: descriptions may repeat, lack the display inputs, or fall outside the eight-description display limit. The recorded risks raise separate evidence questions about detachable parts. Compare the product features and dated findings below before scoping an investigation. These historical observations do not determine your product’s compliance or a market failure rate.
Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.
Dated official observations
Compare the product features and reported failure mechanism
The source wording below describes the reported case at that time. Read each complete report before using it in an investigation.
Eraser · SR/00282/26
Report published 2026-02-06 · notifying country Spain · reported origin People's Republic of China
Reported product description
Erasers in the shape of a pack of chips, a hot dog, a piece of bread, a cup of soft drinks with a straw, a box of popcorn, a glass of beer and a soft ice cream. [1]
Reported risk explanation
Due to its characteristic form, colour, appearance and size, the product may be mistaken for foodstuff. This may lead children to put it in the mouth. Small parts may be bitten off, which could lead to choking. The product does not comply with the General Product Safety Regulation. [1]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Ban on the marketing of the product and any accompanying measuresDate of entry into force: 11/11/2025 [1]
Report published 2025-09-12 · notifying country Spain · reported origin Germany
Reported product description
Set of erasers in the shape of energy drinks, with a white lid and a label reading ‘ENERGY DRINK’. [2]
Reported risk explanation
Due to its characteristic form, colour, appearance and size, the product may be mistaken for foodstuff. This may lead children to put it in the mouth. Moreover, small parts (plastic lids) can easily detach. Small parts may be bitten off or detach, which could lead to choking. The product does not comply with the General Product Safety Regulation. [2]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Ban on the marketing of the product and any accompanying measuresDate of entry into force: 22/07/2025 [2]
Report published 2023-11-17 · notifying country France · reported origin People's Republic of China
Reported product description
Ballpoint pen surmounted with a small pink dinosaur in translucent plastic. A LED is fixed to the pen. [3]
Reported risk explanation
The battery compartment opens/breaks easily, making the button batteries accessible. A child could put them into the mouth, which could cause gastrointestinal damage or lead to choking. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Toy Safety Directive, nor with the European Standard EN 62115. [3]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 06/09/2023Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 06/09/2023 [3]
Due to its characteristic form, colour, appearance and size, the product may be mistaken for foodstuff.This may lead children to put it in the mouth. Small parts may be bitten off or detach, which could lead to choking. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Food Imitating Products Directive nor with the relevant European Standard EN 71-1 . [4]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): DistributorCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 16/04/2019Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): DistributorCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 16/04/2019 [4]
Report published 2019-11-15 · notifying country Bulgaria · reported origin People's Republic of China
Reported product description
Eraser imitating foodstuff (French pastry “Macaron”) in a package containing 5 pieces of erasers in different colours. [5]
Reported risk explanation
The product, due to its characteristic form, colour and size, may be mistaken for foodstuff. Small parts can be easily detached from the product. This may lead especially children to put the small parts in the mouth and choke on them.The product does not comply with the requirements of the Food Imitating Products Directive. [5]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: RetailerCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 21/10/2019 [5]
Report published 2017-06-09 · notifying country United Kingdom · reported origin People's Republic of China
Reported product description
Novelty pens in the shape of lipstick (2 in a pack) and lollipops (4 in a pack). Packaged in clear polythene bag. [6]
Reported risk explanation
null The pen caps are unventilated and may pose a choking risk to young children if put in the mouth and swallowed. [6]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): DistributorCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: Unknown [6]
Report published 2015-05-15 · notifying country Hungary · reported origin People's Republic of China
Reported product description
Colourful spiral erasers looking like lollipop with a label bearing brand, supplier details, country of origin and CE marking. The eraser can be cut, twisted and knotted. Intended for children age 4+ years. [7]
Reported risk explanation
null The product poses a risk of choking because due to its characteristic form, colour and size it may be mistaken for foodstuff. Small parts can be easily detached from the product which may lead children to put them in the mouth, swallow or ingest them. The product does not comply with the requirements of Directive 87/357/EEC on products which, appearing to be other than they are, endanger the health or safety of consumers. [7]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: OtherCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: UnknownType of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: OtherCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 24/02/2015 [7]
Report published 2008-11-28 · notifying country Greece · reported origin People's Republic of China
Reported product description
Erasers sold in stationery sets. Each one consists of two pencils, a ruler, a sharpener, a notebook and an eraser in the shape of an ice-cream stick (approximate dimensions: 6cm x 3.5cm x 0.8cm). All the items (except the eraser) are multicoloured and decorated with pictures of dolls or other figures of girls. The sets are packed in plastic (PVC) handbags (approximate dimensions: 20cm x 13cm x 1.5cm). The handbags bear a label with the address of the importer in Greece, Cyprus and Bulgaria and the warning: “ATTENTION! Not suitable for children under 3 years. It contains small parts that can be swallowed” (written in Greek and Bulgarian). None of the sets’ items can be bought separately. [8]
Reported risk explanation
The product poses a risk of choking as, due to the characteristic form, appearance, colour and size, the sets’ eraser may be mistaken for a foodstuff (ice-cream stick). This may lead children to put it in their mouths, bite it into pieces and swallow it, which could entail the risk of asphyxia or obstruction of the digestive tract. [8]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Voluntary withdrawal from the market by the distributor.Date of entry into force: Unknown [8]
13 distinct official alert references, published between 2007-01-26 and 2026-02-06. Counts describe the acquired reports, with no market denominator.
Report year
Recorded alerts
2007
2
2008
3
2015
1
2017
1
2019
2
2023
1
2025
2
2026
1
Recorded risk labels within this evidence task
Label combinations are source facts within one comparison; they do not create separate guides with identical preparation tasks.
Chemical, Choking: 1 recorded references
Choking: 12 recorded references
Source selection, exclusions and calculation method
Filter the acquired, completely parsed English weekly XML releases. Deduplicate official alert references. Group by product category and the complete set of conditional evidence-question topics supported by actual risk text. Risk-label combinations remain recorded cohort facets and do not create buyer intents. Brand, product name, model, origin, notifying country, measurement-only changes and different wording of the same questions do not create intents. Unrecognized mechanisms stay internal for enrichment. Count report years and notifying countries deterministically. Display at most eight newest descriptions with at least 40 characters after whitespace normalization, nonempty reported measures and distinct casefolded descriptions; break date ties by official identifier. All cohort records count even if their description is shorter or not displayed. This is not a representative sample. Counts concern this acquired corpus only.
One acquired version per official public alert reference. Display at most eight newest distinct product descriptions whose normalized whitespace-collapsed text contains at least 40 characters and has nonempty reported measures; ties sort by official identifier. The complete cohort includes shorter descriptions. This is an explicit display selection, not a representative sample.
8 distinct descriptions displayed; 5 cohort records not displayed. Missing fields: {'description': 1}.
These are selected, dated enforcement observations in the acquired weekly reports, not a random market sample, market-wide failure rate, proof of current product status, or a determination about your product. Notification country is not a complete sales-market or jurisdiction-coverage field. A quoted legal/standard reference is the report’s statement, not independently verified current law or a mandatory test panel.
Calculation safety-gate-evidence-comparison-10; units recorded alerts; no incidence denominator.
Turn the reported failure mechanism into a scoped investigation
Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.
Accessible and detachable parts — what evidence do we have?
Document the intended users/age, accessible parts, attachment/retention design and relevant use or misuse conditions. Compare the source’s actual detachment or choking explanation with your product; agree justified methods and current criteria separately.
Useful evidence: Age/use rationale, part/attachment drawings, material and assembly data, existing retention/accessibility evidence.
Can we trace the affected component, formula or design revision across our supplied products?
Compare the reported descriptions with your own identifiers and change records. Treat missing or “Unknown” source fields as unresolved; they do not establish that no action was needed.
Useful evidence: Product identifiers, revision history, supplier/batch traceability and market/operator records.
Who would own an evidence review and any resulting corrective-action decision?
Read the reported measures as historical observations. Establish your own operator roles, sector-specific rules, decision owner and communication responsibilities before adopting another case’s response.
Conditional: Product-risk evidence and operator-role review — Compare the recorded product features and failure mechanism with your product. Confirm the applicable product regime, deciding evidence, operator responsibilities and justified next steps. This does not assume that GPSR or a representative appointment applies to every alert category.
Questions for providers
Which specific product features and reported risk mechanism make these cases relevant or irrelevant to our product?
What current legal, standards or scientific sources support your proposed investigation criteria, and what cannot be concluded from these dated alerts?
Which existing evidence can answer the risk question, what additional work is justified, and who owns any resulting corrective-action decision?
Sources and data dates
Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.
