Reported risk evidence comparison

Machinery: optical output — reported risk evidence

The acquired cohort contains 32 official alert references published from 2019-05-10 to 2026-09-18. This page compares 8 selected, distinct product descriptions, including laser engraving machine, laser engraver, laser cutting machine. The other 24 records still contribute to the cohort counts but are not displayed: descriptions may repeat, lack the display inputs, or fall outside the eight-description display limit. The recorded risks raise separate evidence questions about optical output. Compare the product features and dated findings below before scoping an investigation. These historical observations do not determine your product’s compliance or a market failure rate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Dated official observations

Compare the product features and reported failure mechanism

The source wording below describes the reported case at that time. Read each complete report before using it in an investigation.

Laser engraving machine · SR/02441/26

Report published 2026-09-18 · notifying country Austria · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Laser engraver for all materials (CNC laser machine) [1]
Reported risk explanation: The user of the product can have unprotected access to the laser beam during operation, which could cause damage to sightMoreover, due to the scattered radiation emitted by the product during operation, the user and other people could be injured.Additionally, users could be exposed to toxic substances (vapours) which may be generated during the processing of materials and can cause other health risks to the users. The product does not comply with the Machinery Directive. [1]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Stop of salesDate of entry into force: Unknown [1]

Read the official alert ↗

Laser engraving machine · SR/01544/26

Report published 2026-06-05 · notifying country Germany · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Grey/black laser engraver, around 15 cm high. Product sold online. [2]
Reported risk explanation: Because the safety mechanisms are easily bypassed, and because of the lack of a protective shielding, direct access to laser radiation from the reflected laser beam during operation is possible. Looking directly into the laser beam or exposure via scattered radiation could damage a person’s sight. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Machinery Directive or with European standard EN 60825-1. [2]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: UnknownType of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Removal of this product listing by the online marketplaceDate of entry into force: Unknown [2]

Read the official alert ↗

Laser engraving machine · SR/00696/26

Report published 2026-03-13 · notifying country Germany · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Stand-mounted laser engraving machine. Approximately 15 cm tall. Product sold online, in particular via eBay (unique product identifier: 388395108449). [3]
Reported risk explanation: The laser beam is too powerful and not adequately enclosed. Direct viewing of the laser beam could cause damage to sight. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Machinery Directive. [3]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: Unknown [3]

Read the official alert ↗

Laser engraving machine · SR/00735/26

Report published 2026-03-13 · notifying country Germany · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Desktop laser engraving machine equipped with a 40W CO2 laser and a cutter. Product sold online, in particular via www.de.omtech.com. [4]
Reported risk explanation: Because the safety mechanisms are easily bypassed, and because of the lack of a base plate, direct access to laser radiation during operation is possible. Looking directly into the laser beam or exposure via scattered radiation could damage a person’s sight. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Machinery Directive nor with the European standard EN 60825-1. [4]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Making the marketing of the product subject to prior conditionsDate of entry into force: 11/01/2026Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 11/01/2026Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Marking the product with appropriate warnings on the risksDate of entry into force: 11/01/2026 [4]

Read the official alert ↗

Laser engraving machine · SR/00747/26

Report published 2026-03-13 · notifying country Germany · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Laser engraver with a diode laser (Laser: 455 nm, 3000 mW). Product sold online, in particular via Aliexpress (unique product identifier: 1005006642621618). [5]
Reported risk explanation: Because the safety mechanisms are easily bypassed, and because of the lack of a base plate, direct access to laser radiation during operation is possible. Looking directly into the laser beam or exposure via scattered radiation could damage a person’s sight. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Machinery Directive or with European standard EN 60825-1. [5]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 27/02/2026Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Removal of this product listing by the online marketplaceDate of entry into force: 24/02/2026 [5]

Read the official alert ↗

Laser engraver · SR/00595/26

Report published 2026-02-27 · notifying country Germany · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Desktop laser engraving machine equipped with a diode laser. Product sold online, in particular via TEMU and www.atomstack.com. [6]
Reported risk explanation: The machine lacks a protective enclosure, and the laser head's cover leaves an open gap in the working space during operation. This can allow reflected laser radiation to escape and cause damage to the sight of the machine operator or third parties not wearing the provided protective glasses. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Machinery Directive nor with the European standards EN 60825-1 and EN 60825-4. [6]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 11/02/2026Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Making the marketing of the product subject to prior conditionsDate of entry into force: 11/02/2026Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Making the marketing of the product subject to prior conditionsDate of entry into force: 11/02/2026 [6]

Read the official alert ↗

Laser cutting machine · OR/00165/25

Report published 2025-12-05 · notifying country Germany · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Desktop laser cutting and engraving machine. Class: 4. Product sold online, in particular via store.creality.com. [7]
Reported risk explanation: The machine lacks a protective enclosure, and the laser head's cover leaves an open gap in the working space during operation. This can allow reflected laser radiation to escape and cause damage to the sight of the machine operator or third parties not wearing the provided protective glasses. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Machinery Directive nor with the European standards EN 11553 and EN 60825-1. [7]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): DistributorCategory of measure(s): Warning consumers of the risksDate of entry into force: 14/11/2025Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ImporterCategory of measure(s): Warning consumers of the risksDate of entry into force: 14/11/2025 [7]

Read the official alert ↗

Laser engraving machine · SR/01943/25

Report published 2025-05-23 · notifying country Germany · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Laser engraving machine. Product sold online, in particular via Amazon (ASIN: B0BNKYQ4NK). [8]
Reported risk explanation: There is a lack of (sufficient) protection from reflected or scattered radiation, which can lead users to be unintentionally exposed to radiation and consequently suffer damage to their health. In addition, the protective glass of the protective goggles is green and the laser is blue, while the protective glass should be red (complementary contrast). This results in a serious risk, as class 4 radiation could be directed at the user or others, and scattered radiation might lead to permanent eye damage due to inadequate protection from harmful radiation. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Machinery Directive. [8]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: UnknownType of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: Unknown [8]

Read the official alert ↗

What this acquired cohort contains

32 distinct official alert references, published between 2019-05-10 and 2026-09-18. Counts describe the acquired reports, with no market denominator.

Report year	Recorded alerts
2019	2
2020	4
2021	8
2022	5
2023	3
2024	2
2025	2
2026	6

Recorded risk labels within this evidence task

Label combinations are source facts within one comparison; they do not create separate guides with identical preparation tasks.

Damage to sight: 29 recorded references
Damage to sight, Health risk / other, Injuries: 1 recorded references
Damage to sight, Injuries: 1 recorded references
Electric shock: 1 recorded references

Source selection, exclusions and calculation method

Filter the acquired, completely parsed English weekly XML releases. Deduplicate official alert references. Group by product category and the complete set of conditional evidence-question topics supported by actual risk text. Risk-label combinations remain recorded cohort facets and do not create buyer intents. Brand, product name, model, origin, notifying country, measurement-only changes and different wording of the same questions do not create intents. Unrecognized mechanisms stay internal for enrichment. Count report years and notifying countries deterministically. Display at most eight newest descriptions with at least 40 characters after whitespace normalization, nonempty reported measures and distinct casefolded descriptions; break date ties by official identifier. All cohort records count even if their description is shorter or not displayed. This is not a representative sample. Counts concern this acquired corpus only.

One acquired version per official public alert reference. Display at most eight newest distinct product descriptions whose normalized whitespace-collapsed text contains at least 40 characters and has nonempty reported measures; ties sort by official identifier. The complete cohort includes shorter descriptions. This is an explicit display selection, not a representative sample.

8 distinct descriptions displayed; 24 cohort records not displayed. Missing fields: {}.

These are selected, dated enforcement observations in the acquired weekly reports, not a random market sample, market-wide failure rate, proof of current product status, or a determination about your product. Notification country is not a complete sales-market or jurisdiction-coverage field. A quoted legal/standard reference is the report’s statement, not independently verified current law or a mandatory test panel.

Calculation safety-gate-evidence-comparison-10; units recorded alerts; no incidence denominator.

Turn the reported failure mechanism into a scoped investigation

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

Optical output and accessible-use configuration — what evidence do we have?
Identify the optical source, rated output and accessible operating modes, users and protective controls. Request configuration-specific evidence and a supported applicability review rather than inferring a classification or safe output from another alert.
Useful evidence: Source/output specifications, operating modes, access/protection design, intended users and existing measurement evidence.
Reported context: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]
Can we trace the affected component, formula or design revision across our supplied products?
Compare the reported descriptions with your own identifiers and change records. Treat missing or “Unknown” source fields as unresolved; they do not establish that no action was needed.
Useful evidence: Product identifiers, revision history, supplier/batch traceability and market/operator records.
Who would own an evidence review and any resulting corrective-action decision?
Read the reported measures as historical observations. Establish your own operator roles, sector-specific rules, decision owner and communication responsibilities before adopting another case’s response.
Useful evidence: Supply-chain responsibility map, applicable-law review, investigation scope and documented decision/communication workflow.

Work packages and dependencies

Conditional: Product-risk evidence and operator-role review — Compare the recorded product features and failure mechanism with your product. Confirm the applicable product regime, deciding evidence, operator responsibilities and justified next steps. This does not assume that GPSR or a representative appointment applies to every alert category.

Questions for providers

Which specific product features and reported risk mechanism make these cases relevant or irrelevant to our product?
What current legal, standards or scientific sources support your proposed investigation criteria, and what cannot be concluded from these dated alerts?
Which existing evidence can answer the risk question, what additional work is justified, and who owns any resulting corrective-action decision?

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.