The acquired cohort contains 8 official alert references published from 2005-05-04 to 2018-01-12. This page compares 7 selected, distinct product descriptions, including mini motorbike, impact drill.. The other 1 records still contribute to the cohort counts but are not displayed: descriptions may repeat, lack the display inputs, or fall outside the eight-description display limit. The recorded risks raise separate evidence questions about accessible edges. Compare the product features and dated findings below before scoping an investigation. These historical observations do not determine your product’s compliance or a market failure rate.
Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.
Dated official observations
Compare the product features and reported failure mechanism
The source wording below describes the reported case at that time. Read each complete report before using it in an investigation.
Mini motorbike · A12/1785/12
Report published 2012-11-30 · notifying country Spain · reported origin People's Republic of China
Reported product description
Petrol-fuelled mini motorbike packed in a cardboard box. [1]
Reported risk explanation
null The product poses a risk of burns , cuts, electric shock and injuries because:· The material of the cowl is fragile and may break.· The type of accelerator is not progressive and there is a risk of unexpected variations in speed. · The locking key for the petrol is far from the tank.· There are sharp edges near the cowl, screen, chassis and identification plate. · The copper conductors of the wiring can be accessed by the user. · When overfilled, the mini-motorcycle leaks fuel over electrical or hot parts. The product does not comply with the Machinery Directive. [1]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: OtherCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: Unknown [1]
Report published 2007-10-12 · notifying country Hungary · reported origin People's Republic of China
Reported product description
The product has green plastic cover. The machine is supplied with an ordinary chuck, which can be tightened with a tool. Main parts of the device: mains plug (Y002; 10/16A; 250V; + marks of approval); mains cable (YUYAO JINMAELECTRIC WIRE FACTORY; H05VV-F; 2x0.75mm2; VDE); switch + speed regulator unit (FA2-6/1BEK; 4(4)A; 250V~; 5E4; TÜV), suppression unit (MEX/TENTA; MKT; 275V; 0,22uF; X2 + marks of approval) and motor without inscriptions. Technical specification: 230V~; 50Hz; 500W; 0-2800r/min; 13mm; Class II. [2]
Reported risk explanation
The product poses serious risk of electric shock because basic insulated wires get into contact with the sharp edges of the stator and accessible metal parts.The product does not comply with the Machinery Directive and the relevant European standard EN 60745. [2]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: OtherCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal from the market and recall from consumers ordered by the authority.Date of entry into force: Unknown [2]
Report published 2006-08-25 · notifying country Hungary · reported origin People's Republic of China
Reported product description
Electric drilling machine “REDLINE”Type/model: RL/ID0709-760. [3]
Reported risk explanation
The product poses a risk of:- <u>electric shock</u> because in the surroundings of the switch the internal wires are not properly fixed and can get into contact with sharp edges or get pinched;- <u>injury</u> because the instructions for use do not contain some provisions required for the safe use (e.g., extension cable set in case of outdoor use, use of complementary grip).This product does not comply with the Machinery Directive and the European Standard EN 60745. [3]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: OtherCategory of measure(s): Sales ban, withdrawal from the market and recall from consumers ordered by the authority.Date of entry into force: Unknown [3]
Report published 2006-07-07 · notifying country United Kingdom · reported origin People's Republic of China
Reported product description
mini motorbike (Quad Bike) “Jin Ling / Ling Sha - Smart Shark”Type/number of model: BC – 04. [4]
Reported risk explanation
This quad bike poses a risk of injuries and burns because:- There is no differential fitted, causing operating problems for the driver and making overturning the bike more likely.- The drive chain and sprocket is not guarded.- There is a space next to the foot rest, causing a trapping hazard and the possibility of burns from the adjacent exhaust pipe.- There are sharp edges on the bike.- The fuel system was insecure in part.- The bike seat was insecure.- The construction of the bike was extremely poor, with poor quality welding, electrics, mounting bolts, braking and fuel systems. [4]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: OtherCategory of measure(s): Suspension of sale ordered by the authority. Date of entry into force: Unknown [4]
Report published 2006-06-30 · notifying country United Kingdom · reported origin People's Republic of China
Reported product description
mini motorbikes.Type/number of model: The words ‘F.Kingdom’ on the handlebars. [5]
Reported risk explanation
This mini-motorbike poses a risk of injury because the drive chain and sprocket were unguarded and presented a trapping and contact hazard to the user and because of steering and braking deficiencies. A potential fire hazard exists due to inadequacies in the fuel system.The bike failed to comply with the Standard BS 7407 in a number of aspects:- The drive chain and sprocket were not guarded. - The braking system was insecurely attached, operated abnormally and was imbalanced and inefficient. - The machine did not have a suspension system, which in certain conditions would affect the handling characteristics.- The steering mechanism fouled on the fairing and did not have full freedom of movement. - There were sharp edges, trapping hazards and mis-alignment of the fairing. [5]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: OtherCategory of measure(s): Suspension from sale by the authority. (Importer signed over the bikes to the local authority for disposal).Date of entry into force: Unknown [5]
Report published 2006-06-09 · notifying country United Kingdom · reported origin People's Republic of China
Reported product description
The product 1.3 metres long, saddle height 60 cm, handlebar height 80 cm. [6]
Reported risk explanation
Due to various safety hazards presented by the product, it is extremely dangerous to operate and is likely to cause injury to the rider and to any other persons in the vicinity of the machine.In particular, it poses a risk of catching body parts/clothing in moving chain/sprocket, burns from exhaust and inhalation and/or fire from vapours from the fuel tank because:-the drive chain and sprocket are not sufficiently guarded– frontal chain guard that is fitted is insufficient and also has sharp edges;-the exhaust is insufficiently shielded posing a risk of burns;-there is no speed-limiting device or a re-set on the engine stop;-the way the fuel tank is vented causes the rider to inhale petrol fumes and poses a potential fire hazard if the rider of anyone nearby is smoking near the tank cap during the venting process;-there is a risk of fouling fuel supply pipe;-the rear brake assembly is not correctly secured and locked together. [6]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: OtherCategory of measure(s): Sales ban ordered by the authority. Date of entry into force: UnknownType of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Voluntary recall by the supplier.Date of entry into force: Unknown [6]
Report published 2005-05-04 · notifying country France · reported origin Unknown
Reported product description
Electrical child battery operated mini motorbike “LOGITOYS - Mini Pocket Electric Bike /Mini Scooter Electrique De Poche”.Type/number of model: 111-0004; EAN 6932367988773. [7]
Reported risk explanation
Risk of injury. The protective grids of the battery and of the transmission chain present sharp edges. One child has been reported as being deeply cut. [7]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Voluntary withdrawal from distribution.Date of entry into force: Unknown [7]
8 distinct official alert references, published between 2005-05-04 and 2018-01-12. Counts describe the acquired reports, with no market denominator.
Report year
Recorded alerts
2005
1
2006
4
2007
1
2012
1
2018
1
Recorded risk labels within this evidence task
Label combinations are source facts within one comparison; they do not create separate guides with identical preparation tasks.
Burns, Cuts, Electric shock, Injuries: 1 recorded references
Burns, Fire, Injuries: 1 recorded references
Burns, Injuries: 2 recorded references
Electric shock: 1 recorded references
Electric shock, Injuries: 1 recorded references
Fire, Injuries: 1 recorded references
Injuries: 1 recorded references
Source selection, exclusions and calculation method
Filter the acquired, completely parsed English weekly XML releases. Deduplicate official alert references. Group by product category and the complete set of conditional evidence-question topics supported by actual risk text. Risk-label combinations remain recorded cohort facets and do not create buyer intents. Brand, product name, model, origin, notifying country, measurement-only changes and different wording of the same questions do not create intents. Unrecognized mechanisms stay internal for enrichment. Count report years and notifying countries deterministically. Display at most eight newest descriptions with at least 40 characters after whitespace normalization, nonempty reported measures and distinct casefolded descriptions; break date ties by official identifier. All cohort records count even if their description is shorter or not displayed. This is not a representative sample. Counts concern this acquired corpus only.
One acquired version per official public alert reference. Display at most eight newest distinct product descriptions whose normalized whitespace-collapsed text contains at least 40 characters and has nonempty reported measures; ties sort by official identifier. The complete cohort includes shorter descriptions. This is an explicit display selection, not a representative sample.
7 distinct descriptions displayed; 1 cohort records not displayed. Missing fields: {}.
These are selected, dated enforcement observations in the acquired weekly reports, not a random market sample, market-wide failure rate, proof of current product status, or a determination about your product. Notification country is not a complete sales-market or jurisdiction-coverage field. A quoted legal/standard reference is the report’s statement, not independently verified current law or a mandatory test panel.
Calculation safety-gate-evidence-comparison-10; units recorded alerts; no incidence denominator.
Turn the reported failure mechanism into a scoped investigation
Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.
Accessible edges and points — what evidence do we have?
Compare the particular accessible edge or point, material, geometry and use conditions with the reported cutting mechanism. Ask a specialist to justify the applicable assessment and criteria for your actual product and users.
Useful evidence: Dimensioned edge/point drawings, material and finish specifications, use/accessibility context and relevant existing evaluation.
Can we trace the affected component, formula or design revision across our supplied products?
Compare the reported descriptions with your own identifiers and change records. Treat missing or “Unknown” source fields as unresolved; they do not establish that no action was needed.
Useful evidence: Product identifiers, revision history, supplier/batch traceability and market/operator records.
Who would own an evidence review and any resulting corrective-action decision?
Read the reported measures as historical observations. Establish your own operator roles, sector-specific rules, decision owner and communication responsibilities before adopting another case’s response.
Conditional: Product-risk evidence and operator-role review — Compare the recorded product features and failure mechanism with your product. Confirm the applicable product regime, deciding evidence, operator responsibilities and justified next steps. This does not assume that GPSR or a representative appointment applies to every alert category.
Questions for providers
Which specific product features and reported risk mechanism make these cases relevant or irrelevant to our product?
What current legal, standards or scientific sources support your proposed investigation criteria, and what cannot be concluded from these dated alerts?
Which existing evidence can answer the risk question, what additional work is justified, and who owns any resulting corrective-action decision?
Sources and data dates
Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.
