Reported risk evidence comparison

Lighting equipment: accessible edges — reported risk evidence

The acquired cohort contains 72 official alert references published from 2005-06-17 to 2025-09-05. This page compares 8 selected, distinct product descriptions, including ceiling lamp, portable lamp, table lamp. The other 64 records still contribute to the cohort counts but are not displayed: descriptions may repeat, lack the display inputs, or fall outside the eight-description display limit. The recorded risks raise separate evidence questions about accessible edges. Compare the product features and dated findings below before scoping an investigation. These historical observations do not determine your product’s compliance or a market failure rate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Dated official observations

Compare the product features and reported failure mechanism

The source wording below describes the reported case at that time. Read each complete report before using it in an investigation.

Ceiling lamp · SR/03163/25

Report published 2025-09-05 · notifying country Poland · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Ceiling lamp, input: 85-265V, max. 60W. Product sold online, in particular via TEMU with product identification number: 601099578195766. [1]
Reported risk explanation: The cable of the product is not properly anchored. The wires are protected with basic insulation only and are in contact with sharp edges. In case of insulation damage the user could touch accessible live parts and receive an electric shock. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive nor with the European standard EN 60598-1. [1]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: OtherCategory of measure(s): Import rejected at borderDate of entry into force: 09/06/2025 [1]

Read the official alert ↗

Portable lamp · A11/00098/24

Report published 2024-08-30 · notifying country Slovakia · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Portable lamp with a stoneware base, which includes a removable glass shade of a replaceable light source. [2]
Reported risk explanation: Due to sharp edges in the conductor spaces, the supply cable may be damaged by cutting through the insulation, which may result in access to live parts. This can cause an electric shock to end users. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive nor with the European standards EN 60598-1 and EN 60598-2-4. [2]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): DistributorCategory of measure(s): Stop of salesDate of entry into force: 05/06/2024Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): DistributorCategory of measure(s): Warning consumers of the risksDate of entry into force: 05/06/2024Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): DistributorCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 05/06/2024 [2]

Read the official alert ↗

Table lamp · A11/00070/22

Report published 2022-05-27 · notifying country Poland · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Portable table lamp with a metal housing, class II double insulated appliance. [3]
Reported risk explanation: Internal wirings can become damaged due to contact with sharp metal parts of the lamp. The user could receive an electric shock from accessible live parts. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive nor with the European standard EN 60598-1. [3]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 15/04/2022Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Destruction of the productDate of entry into force: 15/04/2022Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Warning consumers of the risksDate of entry into force: 15/04/2022 [3]

Read the official alert ↗

Table lamp · A11/00069/22

Report published 2022-05-27 · notifying country Poland · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Table lamp with metal casing, class II double insulated appliance. [4]
Reported risk explanation: Internal wirings can become damaged due to contact with sharp metal parts of the lamp. The user could receive an electric shock from accessible live parts. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive nor with the European standard EN 60598-1. [4]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Destruction of the productDate of entry into force: 15/04/2022Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Warning consumers of the risksDate of entry into force: 15/04/2022Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 15/04/2022 [4]

Read the official alert ↗

Table lamp · A11/00068/22

Report published 2022-05-27 · notifying country Poland · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Portable table lamp with metal casing, class II double insulated appliance. [5]
Reported risk explanation: The wire could get damaged by sharp metal parts due to insufficient protection by bushing of insulating material that passes through accessible metal parts (which are not rounded). The user could receive an electric shock from accessible live parts. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive nor with the European standard EN 60598-1. [5]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 15/04/2022Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Destruction of the productDate of entry into force: 15/04/2022Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Warning consumers of the risksDate of entry into force: 15/04/2022 [5]

Read the official alert ↗

Floor lamp · A11/00067/22

Report published 2022-05-27 · notifying country Poland · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Portable floor lamp with metal casing, class II double insulated appliance. [6]
Reported risk explanation: The wire could get damaged by sharp metal parts due to insufficient protection by bushing of insulating material that passes through accessible metal parts (which are not rounded). The user could receive an electric shock from accessible live parts. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive nor with the European standard EN 60598-1. [6]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 15/04/2022Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Warning consumers of the risksDate of entry into force: 15/04/2022Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Destruction of the productDate of entry into force: 15/04/2022 [6]

Read the official alert ↗

Desk lamp with moving picture-foil · A12/00119/21

Report published 2021-02-05 · notifying country Hungary · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Table lamp with moving picture-foil representing an aquarium. [7]
Reported risk explanation: The cable is not properly anchored. The accessible wires are in contact with sharp edges. A user might touch the live parts and suffer an electric shock. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive and the relevant European standard EN 60598. [7]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 19/12/2020Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 19/12/2020 [7]

Read the official alert ↗

LED spotlight · A12/00663/20

Report published 2020-05-01 · notifying country United Kingdom · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Indoor wall/ceiling class I LED directional spotlight for track mounting, with up to 5000 Lumens and power consumption up to 54 Watts. The product comes in black or white housing and can emit white light in 3000 K or 4000 K. [8]
Reported risk explanation: The hinged bracket adjusting the position of the head of the product has sharp edges and can trap the live and neutral cables. Consequently, the bracket could cut the insulation of the cables, leaving live parts accessible in contact with the metal housing of the product. The user could touch accessible live parts, increasing the risk electric shock. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive. [8]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 12/03/2020Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Making the marketing of the product subject to prior conditionsDate of entry into force: UnknownType of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Temporary ban on the supply, offer to supply and display of the productDate of entry into force: UnknownType of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 12/03/2020 [8]

Read the official alert ↗

What this acquired cohort contains

72 distinct official alert references, published between 2005-06-17 and 2025-09-05. Counts describe the acquired reports, with no market denominator.

Report year	Recorded alerts
2005	8
2006	13
2007	15
2008	7
2009	2
2010	5
2011	1
2012	1
2013	2
2014	3
2015	1
2017	3
2018	1
2019	1
2020	1
2021	1
2022	5
2024	1
2025	1

Recorded risk labels within this evidence task

Label combinations are source facts within one comparison; they do not create separate guides with identical preparation tasks.

Burns, Electric shock, Fire: 3 recorded references
Burns, Electric shock, Injuries: 1 recorded references
Cuts: 1 recorded references
Electric shock: 44 recorded references
Electric shock, Fire: 10 recorded references
Electric shock, Fire, Injuries: 3 recorded references
Electric shock, Injuries: 10 recorded references

Source selection, exclusions and calculation method

Filter the acquired, completely parsed English weekly XML releases. Deduplicate official alert references. Group by product category and the complete set of conditional evidence-question topics supported by actual risk text. Risk-label combinations remain recorded cohort facets and do not create buyer intents. Brand, product name, model, origin, notifying country, measurement-only changes and different wording of the same questions do not create intents. Unrecognized mechanisms stay internal for enrichment. Count report years and notifying countries deterministically. Display at most eight newest descriptions with at least 40 characters after whitespace normalization, nonempty reported measures and distinct casefolded descriptions; break date ties by official identifier. All cohort records count even if their description is shorter or not displayed. This is not a representative sample. Counts concern this acquired corpus only.

One acquired version per official public alert reference. Display at most eight newest distinct product descriptions whose normalized whitespace-collapsed text contains at least 40 characters and has nonempty reported measures; ties sort by official identifier. The complete cohort includes shorter descriptions. This is an explicit display selection, not a representative sample.

8 distinct descriptions displayed; 64 cohort records not displayed. Missing fields: {'measures': 2, 'description': 5}.

These are selected, dated enforcement observations in the acquired weekly reports, not a random market sample, market-wide failure rate, proof of current product status, or a determination about your product. Notification country is not a complete sales-market or jurisdiction-coverage field. A quoted legal/standard reference is the report’s statement, not independently verified current law or a mandatory test panel.

Calculation safety-gate-evidence-comparison-10; units recorded alerts; no incidence denominator.

Turn the reported failure mechanism into a scoped investigation

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

Accessible edges and points — what evidence do we have?
Compare the particular accessible edge or point, material, geometry and use conditions with the reported cutting mechanism. Ask a specialist to justify the applicable assessment and criteria for your actual product and users.
Useful evidence: Dimensioned edge/point drawings, material and finish specifications, use/accessibility context and relevant existing evaluation.
Reported context: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]
Can we trace the affected component, formula or design revision across our supplied products?
Compare the reported descriptions with your own identifiers and change records. Treat missing or “Unknown” source fields as unresolved; they do not establish that no action was needed.
Useful evidence: Product identifiers, revision history, supplier/batch traceability and market/operator records.
Who would own an evidence review and any resulting corrective-action decision?
Read the reported measures as historical observations. Establish your own operator roles, sector-specific rules, decision owner and communication responsibilities before adopting another case’s response.
Useful evidence: Supply-chain responsibility map, applicable-law review, investigation scope and documented decision/communication workflow.

Work packages and dependencies

Conditional: Product-risk evidence and operator-role review — Compare the recorded product features and failure mechanism with your product. Confirm the applicable product regime, deciding evidence, operator responsibilities and justified next steps. This does not assume that GPSR or a representative appointment applies to every alert category.

Questions for providers

Which specific product features and reported risk mechanism make these cases relevant or irrelevant to our product?
What current legal, standards or scientific sources support your proposed investigation criteria, and what cannot be concluded from these dated alerts?
Which existing evidence can answer the risk question, what additional work is justified, and who owns any resulting corrective-action decision?

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.