Reported risk evidence comparison

Lighting chains: insulation — reported risk evidence

The acquired cohort contains 142 official alert references published from 2008-01-18 to 2026-07-10. This page compares 8 selected, distinct product descriptions, including lighting chain. The other 134 records still contribute to the cohort counts but are not displayed: descriptions may repeat, lack the display inputs, or fall outside the eight-description display limit. The recorded risks raise separate evidence questions about insulation. Compare the product features and dated findings below before scoping an investigation. These historical observations do not determine your product’s compliance or a market failure rate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Dated official observations

Compare the product features and reported failure mechanism

The source wording below describes the reported case at that time. Read each complete report before using it in an investigation.

Lighting chain · SR/01998/26

Report published 2026-07-10 · notifying country Hungary · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Mains-powered, series-connectable, curtain-like Christmas lighting chain with 8 plastic icicle-shaped tubes containing 288 LED lights. Technical data: 220-240V, 50Hz, 4.2W. [1]
Reported risk explanation: The cable is not properly anchored (missing cable strain relief) and the accessible wires have inadequate insulation. The user could touch accessible live parts and receive an electric shock. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive nor with the European standards EN 60598. [1]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 16/05/2026Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 16/05/2026Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Warning consumers of the risksDate of entry into force: 16/05/2026 [1]

Read the official alert ↗

Lighting chain · SR/01667/26

Report published 2026-06-12 · notifying country Hungary · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Icicle-style decorative light string with 500 multi-coloured LEDs, white insulated wiring, and an end-to-end connector for extendable series connection. [2]
Reported risk explanation: The product has inadequate insulation and a flashover may occur during use. The user could touch accessible live parts and receive an electric shock. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive nor with the European standards EN 60598-1 and EN 60598-2-20. [2]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: RetailerCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 19/02/2026Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 19/02/2026 [2]

Read the official alert ↗

Lighting chain · SR/01656/26

Report published 2026-06-12 · notifying country Hungary · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Lighting chain with LED lights with end-to-end connector, 30 m. [3]
Reported risk explanation: The product has inadequate insulation and a flashover may occur during use. The user could touch accessible live parts and receive an electric shock. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive nor with the European standard EN 60598. [3]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: RetailerCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 19/02/2026Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 19/02/2026 [3]

Read the official alert ↗

Lighting chain · SR/01658/26

Report published 2026-06-12 · notifying country Hungary · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Extendable icicle-style lighting chain with 80 LED lights on a string with blinking function. [4]
Reported risk explanation: The product has inadequate insulation and a flashover may occur during use. The user could touch accessible live parts and receive an electric shock. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive nor with the European standard EN 60598. [4]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 19/02/2026Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: RetailerCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 19/02/2026 [4]

Read the official alert ↗

Lighting chain · SR/01150/26

Report published 2026-04-17 · notifying country France · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Lighting chain with eight tubes of LED lights. Product sold online, in particular via AliExpress (unique product identifier: 1005007165911215) and eBay. [5]
Reported risk explanation: The product has inadequate insulation and there is insufficient protection against water. The user could touch accessible live parts and receive an electric shock. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive. [5]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 25/03/2026Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Removal of this product listing by the online marketplaceDate of entry into force: 25/03/2026Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Warning consumers of the risksDate of entry into force: 18/05/2026 [5]

Read the official alert ↗

Lighting chain · SR/00835/26

Report published 2026-03-27 · notifying country Lithuania · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Garland type LED lighting chain with 120 non-replaceable lamps, rated voltage of 250 V and rated current of 2.5 A. [6]
Reported risk explanation: The product has inadequate insulation. Therefore, the user could touch accessible live parts, which may cause an electric shock. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive nor with the European standard EN 60598. [6]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: RetailerCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: Unknown [6]

Read the official alert ↗

Lighting chain · SR/00836/26

Report published 2026-03-27 · notifying country Lithuania · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Garland type LED lighting chain with 100 non-replaceable lamps, rated voltage of 220 - 240 V and rated power of 1.5 W. Product sold online, in particular via www.pigubeakcijos.lt. [7]
Reported risk explanation: The product has inadequate insulation. Therefore, the user could touch accessible live parts, which may cause an electric shock. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive nor with the European standard EN 60598. [7]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: RetailerCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: Unknown [7]

Read the official alert ↗

Lighting chain · SR/00891/26

Report published 2026-03-27 · notifying country Hungary · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Lighting chain with 240 cold white LED lights and length of 50 m. Product sold online, in particular via www.szezonrafel.hu [8]
Reported risk explanation: The cable is not properly anchored, and the accessible wires have inadequate insulation. Consequently, the user could touch accessible live parts, leading to a risk of electric shock. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive nor with the European standard EN 60598. [8]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: UnknownType of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Ban on the marketing of the product and any accompanying measuresDate of entry into force: UnknownType of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: Unknown [8]

Read the official alert ↗

What this acquired cohort contains

142 distinct official alert references, published between 2008-01-18 and 2026-07-10. Counts describe the acquired reports, with no market denominator.

Report year	Recorded alerts
2008	5
2009	3
2010	5
2011	1
2012	8
2013	8
2015	1
2016	1
2017	3
2018	3
2019	8
2020	7
2021	11
2022	15
2023	7
2024	17
2025	26
2026	13

Recorded risk labels within this evidence task

Label combinations are source facts within one comparison; they do not create separate guides with identical preparation tasks.

Burns, Electric shock: 4 recorded references
Burns, Electric shock, Fire: 26 recorded references
Choking: 1 recorded references
Choking, Electric shock: 1 recorded references
Electric shock: 96 recorded references
Electric shock, Fire: 14 recorded references

Source selection, exclusions and calculation method

Filter the acquired, completely parsed English weekly XML releases. Deduplicate official alert references. Group by product category and the complete set of conditional evidence-question topics supported by actual risk text. Risk-label combinations remain recorded cohort facets and do not create buyer intents. Brand, product name, model, origin, notifying country, measurement-only changes and different wording of the same questions do not create intents. Unrecognized mechanisms stay internal for enrichment. Count report years and notifying countries deterministically. Display at most eight newest descriptions with at least 40 characters after whitespace normalization, nonempty reported measures and distinct casefolded descriptions; break date ties by official identifier. All cohort records count even if their description is shorter or not displayed. This is not a representative sample. Counts concern this acquired corpus only.

One acquired version per official public alert reference. Display at most eight newest distinct product descriptions whose normalized whitespace-collapsed text contains at least 40 characters and has nonempty reported measures; ties sort by official identifier. The complete cohort includes shorter descriptions. This is an explicit display selection, not a representative sample.

8 distinct descriptions displayed; 134 cohort records not displayed. Missing fields: {'measures': 11}.

These are selected, dated enforcement observations in the acquired weekly reports, not a random market sample, market-wide failure rate, proof of current product status, or a determination about your product. Notification country is not a complete sales-market or jurisdiction-coverage field. A quoted legal/standard reference is the report’s statement, not independently verified current law or a mandatory test panel.

Calculation safety-gate-evidence-comparison-10; units recorded alerts; no incidence denominator.

Turn the reported failure mechanism into a scoped investigation

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

Power-supply insulation boundaries — what evidence do we have?
If your product uses a mains supply or adapter, identify the actual power-supply architecture, insulation boundaries and accessible parts. Ask a qualified specialist which design evidence and investigation would address the reported shock mechanism for this configuration. No medical-device standard or pass/fail limit is selected from this alert.
Useful evidence: Schematics, adapter/component specifications, ratings, insulation/protection design and configuration-specific existing test evidence.
Reported context: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]
Can we trace the affected component, formula or design revision across our supplied products?
Compare the reported descriptions with your own identifiers and change records. Treat missing or “Unknown” source fields as unresolved; they do not establish that no action was needed.
Useful evidence: Product identifiers, revision history, supplier/batch traceability and market/operator records.
Who would own an evidence review and any resulting corrective-action decision?
Read the reported measures as historical observations. Establish your own operator roles, sector-specific rules, decision owner and communication responsibilities before adopting another case’s response.
Useful evidence: Supply-chain responsibility map, applicable-law review, investigation scope and documented decision/communication workflow.

Work packages and dependencies

Conditional: Product-risk evidence and operator-role review — Compare the recorded product features and failure mechanism with your product. Confirm the applicable product regime, deciding evidence, operator responsibilities and justified next steps. This does not assume that GPSR or a representative appointment applies to every alert category.

Questions for providers

Which specific product features and reported risk mechanism make these cases relevant or irrelevant to our product?
What current legal, standards or scientific sources support your proposed investigation criteria, and what cannot be concluded from these dated alerts?
Which existing evidence can answer the risk question, what additional work is justified, and who owns any resulting corrective-action decision?

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.