Reported risk evidence comparison

Furniture: stability/load — reported risk evidence

The acquired cohort contains 70 official alert references published from 2005-04-29 to 2026-09-11. This page compares 8 selected, distinct product descriptions, including chair, table, plastic chair. The other 62 records still contribute to the cohort counts but are not displayed: descriptions may repeat, lack the display inputs, or fall outside the eight-description display limit. The recorded risks raise separate evidence questions about stability/load. Compare the product features and dated findings below before scoping an investigation. These historical observations do not determine your product’s compliance or a market failure rate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Dated official observations

Compare the product features and reported failure mechanism

The source wording below describes the reported case at that time. Read each complete report before using it in an investigation.

Chair · SR/02408/26

Report published 2026-09-11 · notifying country Lithuania · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Camping chair assembled with a metal frame and a fabric seat-back. The frame is made of 18 mm diameter metal tubes, 1.5 mm thick metal plates, metal rivets with washers and plastic armrests. Three 4 mm diameter metal rods and 10 mm springs are used to tension the material. Plastic legs are installed at the bottom of the chair frame. The external distance between the legs at the front is 320 mm. [1]
Reported risk explanation: The chair is not sufficiently resistant to load. As a consequence, it can easily collapse and the user fall and suffer injuries. The product does not comply with the General Product Safety Regulation. [1]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: RetailerCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: Unknown [1]

Read the official alert ↗

Chair · SR/02399/26

Report published 2026-09-11 · notifying country Lithuania · reported origin Ukraine

Reported product description: Chairs with a welded metal frame, upholstered seat and backrest made of 10 mm thick chipboard that is attached to the frame with two M6 screws. The seat base is made of 15 mm thick chipboard and is attached to the frame with four screws (4.5 × 40) mm. [2]
Reported risk explanation: The chair is not sufficiently resistant to load. As a consequence, it can easily collapse, the user fall and suffer injuries. The product does not comply with the General Product Safety Regulation. [2]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: RetailerCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: Unknown [2]

Read the official alert ↗

Table · SR/01921/26

Report published 2026-07-03 · notifying country Bulgaria · reported origin Türkiye

Reported product description: Table with plastic top and metal legs, dimensions 70 x 120 cm, [3]
Reported risk explanation: The table can easily break under weight and collapse, leading to injuries for the users. The product does not comply with the General Product Safety Regulation nor with the European standards EN 581-1 and EN 581-3. [3]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 19/06/2026 [3]

Read the official alert ↗

Plastic chair · SR/00007/26

Report published 2026-01-09 · notifying country Lithuania · reported origin Italy

Reported product description: Plastic chair, made of anthracite-coloured propylene. At floor level, the external distance between the front legs is 445 mm, between the rear legs – 445 mm. The external dimensions of the chair: width 480 mm, height 810 mm, depth 517 mm. The seat height in the middle plane is 432 mm. Weight – 2.54 kg. [4]
Reported risk explanation: The chair's construction does not ensure stability. The chair may tip over, leading to injuries. The product does not comply with the General Product Safety Regulation. [4]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: RetailerCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: Unknown [4]

Read the official alert ↗

Folding chair · SR/04115/25

Report published 2025-11-21 · notifying country Lithuania · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Plastic folding chair with a white plastic seat and backrest. [5]
Reported risk explanation: The chair is not sufficiently resistant to load. As a consequence, it can easily collapse and the user may fall, leading to injuries. The product does not comply with the General Product Safety Regulation. [5]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: Unknown [5]

Read the official alert ↗

Furniture set · SR/03478/25

Report published 2025-10-10 · notifying country Lithuania · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Seating, folding furniture and tables for camping. [6]
Reported risk explanation: The construction of the furniture, particularly the legs and tabletop, can easily break under weight and can therefore collapse, leading to injuries for users. The product does not comply with the General Product Safety Regulation. [6]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: Unknown [6]

Read the official alert ↗

Office chair · SR/03349/25

Report published 2025-09-26 · notifying country Slovakia · reported origin Poland

Reported product description: Black office chair with adjustable armrests, a textile seat and a headrest covered in black leatherette. The chair frame is made of black plastic combined with chrome accessories. Product sold online, in particular via merkurymarket.sk. [7]
Reported risk explanation: The chair is unstable and can tip over during use. Moreover, the seat support structure can deform, or the seat support base can crack, which can result in injury to the user.. The product does not comply with the General Product Safety Directive nor with European standard EN 1335-2. [7]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): DistributorCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: UnknownType of economic operator taking notified measure(s): DistributorCategory of measure(s): Warning consumers of the risksDate of entry into force: UnknownType of economic operator taking notified measure(s): DistributorCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: Unknown [7]

Read the official alert ↗

Folding chair · SR/02954/25

Report published 2025-08-15 · notifying country Germany · reported origin Vietnam

Reported product description: Wooden deck chair with a folding frame and fabric seat in various colours and patterns. Product sold online, in particular via tkmaxx.com/de [8]
Reported risk explanation: Due to an inadequate locking mechanism, the chair can easily collapse. This may result in the user’s fingers being trapped inside and crushed. The product does not comply with the General Product Safety Regulation. [8]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ImporterCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 28/07/2025 [8]

Read the official alert ↗

What this acquired cohort contains

70 distinct official alert references, published between 2005-04-29 and 2026-09-11. Counts describe the acquired reports, with no market denominator.

Report year	Recorded alerts
2005	1
2006	3
2007	2
2009	2
2010	3
2011	1
2014	2
2015	2
2016	2
2017	6
2018	5
2019	2
2020	1
2021	3
2022	10
2023	2
2024	12
2025	6
2026	5

Recorded risk labels within this evidence task

Label combinations are source facts within one comparison; they do not create separate guides with identical preparation tasks.

Burns, Fire: 1 recorded references
Cuts, Injuries: 1 recorded references
Entrapment: 1 recorded references
Entrapment, Injuries: 2 recorded references
Injuries: 65 recorded references

Source selection, exclusions and calculation method

Filter the acquired, completely parsed English weekly XML releases. Deduplicate official alert references. Group by product category and the complete set of conditional evidence-question topics supported by actual risk text. Risk-label combinations remain recorded cohort facets and do not create buyer intents. Brand, product name, model, origin, notifying country, measurement-only changes and different wording of the same questions do not create intents. Unrecognized mechanisms stay internal for enrichment. Count report years and notifying countries deterministically. Display at most eight newest descriptions with at least 40 characters after whitespace normalization, nonempty reported measures and distinct casefolded descriptions; break date ties by official identifier. All cohort records count even if their description is shorter or not displayed. This is not a representative sample. Counts concern this acquired corpus only.

One acquired version per official public alert reference. Display at most eight newest distinct product descriptions whose normalized whitespace-collapsed text contains at least 40 characters and has nonempty reported measures; ties sort by official identifier. The complete cohort includes shorter descriptions. This is an explicit display selection, not a representative sample.

8 distinct descriptions displayed; 62 cohort records not displayed. Missing fields: {'measures': 1, 'description': 1}.

These are selected, dated enforcement observations in the acquired weekly reports, not a random market sample, market-wide failure rate, proof of current product status, or a determination about your product. Notification country is not a complete sales-market or jurisdiction-coverage field. A quoted legal/standard reference is the report’s statement, not independently verified current law or a mandatory test panel.

Calculation safety-gate-evidence-comparison-10; units recorded alerts; no incidence denominator.

Turn the reported failure mechanism into a scoped investigation

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

Stability and load-bearing use — what evidence do we have?
Identify the intended loads, support/attachment design, adjustment positions and use surface. Compare the reported collapse or instability mechanism with the actual configuration and agree a supported investigation rather than copying another case’s response.
Useful evidence: Load/use specification, support/attachment drawings, adjustment configurations, material/assembly and existing structural evidence.
Reported context: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]
Can we trace the affected component, formula or design revision across our supplied products?
Compare the reported descriptions with your own identifiers and change records. Treat missing or “Unknown” source fields as unresolved; they do not establish that no action was needed.
Useful evidence: Product identifiers, revision history, supplier/batch traceability and market/operator records.
Who would own an evidence review and any resulting corrective-action decision?
Read the reported measures as historical observations. Establish your own operator roles, sector-specific rules, decision owner and communication responsibilities before adopting another case’s response.
Useful evidence: Supply-chain responsibility map, applicable-law review, investigation scope and documented decision/communication workflow.

Work packages and dependencies

Conditional: Product-risk evidence and operator-role review — Compare the recorded product features and failure mechanism with your product. Confirm the applicable product regime, deciding evidence, operator responsibilities and justified next steps. This does not assume that GPSR or a representative appointment applies to every alert category.

Questions for providers

Which specific product features and reported risk mechanism make these cases relevant or irrelevant to our product?
What current legal, standards or scientific sources support your proposed investigation criteria, and what cannot be concluded from these dated alerts?
Which existing evidence can answer the risk question, what additional work is justified, and who owns any resulting corrective-action decision?

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.