Reported risk evidence comparison

Electrical appliances and equipment: labels/instructions — reported risk evidence

The acquired cohort contains 69 official alert references published from 2005-04-29 to 2025-12-19. This page compares 8 selected, distinct product descriptions, including cable reel, welding machine, camping lantern. The other 61 records still contribute to the cohort counts but are not displayed: descriptions may repeat, lack the display inputs, or fall outside the eight-description display limit. The recorded risks raise separate evidence questions about labels/instructions. Compare the product features and dated findings below before scoping an investigation. These historical observations do not determine your product’s compliance or a market failure rate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Dated official observations

Compare the product features and reported failure mechanism

The source wording below describes the reported case at that time. Read each complete report before using it in an investigation.

Cable reel · SR/03424/25

Report published 2025-10-03 · notifying country Ireland · reported origin Unknown

Reported product description: Cable reel, with four Irish/UK Plug sockets and two USB ports.Product Ratings: 240 volts, 13 amp, 1000W wound, 3000W unwound.Product Claims: IP44, Thermal Cut-Out USB Ratings: 5V 2.1A. Product sold online, in particular via abcabrasives.ie. [1]
Reported risk explanation: The product is incorrectly labelled with an Ingress Protection (IP) rating of IP44. The actual rating is IP20. The user may perceive an unjustified level of protection against moisture ingress associated with the incorrect IP labelling of the product.This can lead to the user receiving an electric shock This product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive. [1]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 08/09/2025Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 27/08/2025 [1]

Read the official alert ↗

Welding machine · SR/02142/25

Report published 2025-06-13 · notifying country United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Yellow and black welding machine kit. Product sold online, in particular via Amazon. [2]
Reported risk explanation: The lack of clear labels in the national language (English) indicating how to use the buttons could lead to the product being misused by the user. The user may accidentally turn the product on and burn themselves as a result. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive. [2]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Import rejected at borderDate of entry into force: 11/03/2025Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Destruction of the productDate of entry into force: 11/05/2025 [2]

Read the official alert ↗

Camping lantern · SR/00619/25

Report published 2025-02-14 · notifying country Czechia · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Portable LED rechargeable camping lantern. [3]
Reported risk explanation: When changing the lantern, live parts of the power supply are accessible to the user, who can receive an electric shock. The product also lacks the necessary labeling, safety information and instructions for use the product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive nor with the European standard EN 60598. [3]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Ban on the marketing of the product and any accompanying measuresDate of entry into force: 09/01/2025Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): DistributorCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 09/01/2025 [3]

Read the official alert ↗

Portable immersion heater · A12/01647/22

Report published 2022-11-25 · notifying country Romania · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Portable immersion heater; nominal voltage: 220V- 240V; 750W. [4]
Reported risk explanation: The product lacks the adequate labelling and markings. A user may immerge it too little or too much and, as a consequence, get burned or receive an electric shock. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive nor with the European Standard EN 60335. [4]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: RetailerCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 18/11/2022 [4]

Read the official alert ↗

Hair straightener / Curling iron · A11/00063/20

Report published 2020-07-10 · notifying country Romania · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Pink 2 in 1 curling iron and hair straightener. [5]
Reported risk explanation: The product lacks the compulsory instructions manual with the warnings and precautions for its safe use.Consequently, the user is aware of the potential hazards, increasing the risk of burns or electric shock if certain parts are touch by the user or get in contact with water while in use. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive and the relevant European standards EN 60335-1 and EN 60335-2-23. [5]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: RetailerCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 27/05/2020 [5]

Read the official alert ↗

3D printer · A12/1901/18

Report published 2018-12-14 · notifying country Germany · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: 3D printer for home use in the hobby sector. The product has been exclusively sold online (via eBay). [6]
Reported risk explanation: The instructions for use in the national language are missing and insulation is lacking on the lower part of the device. User may touch live parts of the product and receive an electric shock. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Machinery Directive. [6]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: OtherCategory of measure(s): Ban on the marketing of the product and any accompanying measuresDate of entry into force: Unknown [6]

Read the official alert ↗

Carbon monoxide detector · A12/0508/17

Report published 2017-04-21 · notifying country The Netherlands · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Mains-powered carbon monoxide detector in white plastic housing, packed in a cardboard box. [7]
Reported risk explanation: null The product is not marked with the recommended maximum lifetime and does not have the warning to read the instructions carefully before operating or servicing. It may fail to detect dangerous concentrations of carbon monoxide.The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive and the relevant European standard EN 50291. [7]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 19/10/2016 [7]

Read the official alert ↗

UV nail lamp · A12/0524/17

Report published 2017-04-21 · notifying country Hungary · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Mains operated, nail dryer with white casing. Packaging: cardboard box. [8]
Reported risk explanation: null The plastic casing is not sufficiently heat resistant and may overheat and catch fire. The accessible metal parts of the UV tubes are separated with only basic insulation from the live parts. The wire ends of the cable are not properly secured and could detach causing them to become accessible or causing accessible metal parts to become live. If an internal short circuit occurred, the fluorescent lamp may explode causing cuts to the user. The warnings supplied with the product are insufficient.The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive and the relevant European standard EN 60335. [8]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: UnknownType of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 29/12/2016 [8]

Read the official alert ↗

What this acquired cohort contains

69 distinct official alert references, published between 2005-04-29 and 2025-12-19. Counts describe the acquired reports, with no market denominator.

Report year	Recorded alerts
2005	8
2006	13
2007	17
2008	8
2009	1
2010	1
2012	3
2013	2
2014	5
2015	1
2017	2
2018	1
2020	1
2022	1
2023	1
2025	4

Recorded risk labels within this evidence task

Label combinations are source facts within one comparison; they do not create separate guides with identical preparation tasks.

Asphyxiation: 1 recorded references
Burns: 3 recorded references
Burns, Electric shock: 3 recorded references
Burns, Electric shock, Fire: 5 recorded references
Cuts, Electric shock, Fire: 1 recorded references
Electric shock: 38 recorded references
Electric shock, Fire: 10 recorded references
Electric shock, Health risk / other: 1 recorded references
Electric shock, Injuries: 1 recorded references
Fire: 3 recorded references
Fire, Injuries: 1 recorded references
Injuries: 2 recorded references

Source selection, exclusions and calculation method

Filter the acquired, completely parsed English weekly XML releases. Deduplicate official alert references. Group by product category and the complete set of conditional evidence-question topics supported by actual risk text. Risk-label combinations remain recorded cohort facets and do not create buyer intents. Brand, product name, model, origin, notifying country, measurement-only changes and different wording of the same questions do not create intents. Unrecognized mechanisms stay internal for enrichment. Count report years and notifying countries deterministically. Display at most eight newest descriptions with at least 40 characters after whitespace normalization, nonempty reported measures and distinct casefolded descriptions; break date ties by official identifier. All cohort records count even if their description is shorter or not displayed. This is not a representative sample. Counts concern this acquired corpus only.

One acquired version per official public alert reference. Display at most eight newest distinct product descriptions whose normalized whitespace-collapsed text contains at least 40 characters and has nonempty reported measures; ties sort by official identifier. The complete cohort includes shorter descriptions. This is an explicit display selection, not a representative sample.

8 distinct descriptions displayed; 61 cohort records not displayed. Missing fields: {'measures': 4, 'description': 7}.

These are selected, dated enforcement observations in the acquired weekly reports, not a random market sample, market-wide failure rate, proof of current product status, or a determination about your product. Notification country is not a complete sales-market or jurisdiction-coverage field. A quoted legal/standard reference is the report’s statement, not independently verified current law or a mandatory test panel.

Calculation safety-gate-evidence-comparison-10; units recorded alerts; no incidence denominator.

Turn the reported failure mechanism into a scoped investigation

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

Labels, instructions and actual use — what evidence do we have?
Capture the exact label/instruction revision and destination/use context. Compare the information gap described in the report with your own product and current sector requirements, keeping a reported defect separate from a universal wording obligation.
Useful evidence: Current labels/instructions, revision and market/translation records, use/risk information and reviewed applicable requirements.
Reported context: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]
Can we trace the affected component, formula or design revision across our supplied products?
Compare the reported descriptions with your own identifiers and change records. Treat missing or “Unknown” source fields as unresolved; they do not establish that no action was needed.
Useful evidence: Product identifiers, revision history, supplier/batch traceability and market/operator records.
Who would own an evidence review and any resulting corrective-action decision?
Read the reported measures as historical observations. Establish your own operator roles, sector-specific rules, decision owner and communication responsibilities before adopting another case’s response.
Useful evidence: Supply-chain responsibility map, applicable-law review, investigation scope and documented decision/communication workflow.

Work packages and dependencies

Conditional: Product-risk evidence and operator-role review — Compare the recorded product features and failure mechanism with your product. Confirm the applicable product regime, deciding evidence, operator responsibilities and justified next steps. This does not assume that GPSR or a representative appointment applies to every alert category.

Questions for providers

Which specific product features and reported risk mechanism make these cases relevant or irrelevant to our product?
What current legal, standards or scientific sources support your proposed investigation criteria, and what cannot be concluded from these dated alerts?
Which existing evidence can answer the risk question, what additional work is justified, and who owns any resulting corrective-action decision?

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.