Reported risk evidence comparison

Communication and media equipment: insulation — reported risk evidence

The acquired cohort contains 41 official alert references published from 2006-01-27 to 2026-04-10. This page compares 8 selected, distinct product descriptions, including wi-fi repeater, wireless security camera set, sports video camera. The other 33 records still contribute to the cohort counts but are not displayed: descriptions may repeat, lack the display inputs, or fall outside the eight-description display limit. The recorded risks raise separate evidence questions about insulation. Compare the product features and dated findings below before scoping an investigation. These historical observations do not determine your product’s compliance or a market failure rate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Dated official observations

Compare the product features and reported failure mechanism

The source wording below describes the reported case at that time. Read each complete report before using it in an investigation.

Wi-Fi repeater · SR/00984/26

Report published 2026-04-10 · notifying country The Netherlands · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Wi-Fi repeater with plastic housing. Product sold online, in particular via www.allteq.net. [1]
Reported risk explanation: Due to insufficient insulation and electric strength the metal parts of the product (RJ45 port) and connected cables and devices may become live. The user could touch accessible live parts, which may cause an electric shock. The product does not comply with the requirements of the Radio Equipment Directive nor with the European standard EN 62368-1. [1]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 06/03/2026Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 06/03/2026 [1]

Read the official alert ↗

Wireless security camera set · A12/0916/19

Report published 2019-06-21 · notifying country Finland · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: 4-Channel wireless video recorder (4 cameras & central unit) supplied with 5 separate power supplies. Sold in a white cardboard box. [2]
Reported risk explanation: The electrical insulation and the creepage distances between the primary and accessible secondary circuit of the power supply units are not sufficient. Accessible parts of the product could become live, leading to an electric shock.The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive and the relevant European standards EN 60950, EN 50075 and IEC 60884 and the relevant national standard. [2]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 15/02/2019 [2]

Read the official alert ↗

Sports video camera · A12/0533/19

Report published 2019-03-29 · notifying country Finland · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: 4K HD camera with a power supply. Sold in a white cardboard box with the image of the product on the side. [3]
Reported risk explanation: The electrical insulation and the clearance/creepage distances between the primary and accessible secondary circuit of the provided power supply unit are not sufficient. Accessible parts could become live, leading to an electric shock.The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive, the relevant European standards EN 60065 and IEC 60884 and the relevant national standard. [3]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 28/01/2019 [3]

Read the official alert ↗

Two-way portable radio (walkie-talkie) · A12/0204/19

Report published 2019-02-08 · notifying country Finland · reported origin Sweden

Reported product description: A yellow walkie-talkie with a power supply, sold in a black cardboard box. AC Charger Input: 100-240V Output: 12V 500mA. [4]
Reported risk explanation: The electrical insulation and the creepage distances between the primary and accessible secondary circuits of the charger are not sufficient. Accessible parts could become live, leading to an electric shock.The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive and the relevant European standards EN 60950. [4]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 28/11/2018 [4]

Read the official alert ↗

Portable radio · A12/0581/18

Report published 2018-04-20 · notifying country Hungary · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Portable FM radio supplied with a mains cable to charge the built-in battery. Packaging: cardboard box. [5]
Reported risk explanation: The electrical insulation is inadequate. The cross-sectional area of the conductors in the mains cable is too small. Touchable metal parts may become live while charging the radio. The cable could overheat.The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive and the relevant European standard EN 60065. [5]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: UnknownType of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 21/03/2018 [5]

Read the official alert ↗

Computer power supply · A12/1321/17

Report published 2017-09-29 · notifying country Finland · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Power supply (supplied with a notebook computer). [6]
Reported risk explanation: null The electrical insulation is not sufficient. The clearance /creepage distances between the primary windings and the accessible output connector are not sufficient.The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive and the relevant European standard EN 60950. [6]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 08/08/2017Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 08/08/2017 [6]

Read the official alert ↗

Android TV box · A12/0832/17

Report published 2017-06-23 · notifying country Finland · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Android TV box supplied with power supply (AC adapter). Sold in black cardboard box. AC Adapter electrical specifications: Input: 100-240V, 0,3A, 50/60 Hz, Class II; Output: 5V, 2500mA [7]
Reported risk explanation: null The creepage and clearance distances are too small and the insulation of the power supply unit is inadequate. The user can touch live parts.The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive and the relevant European standard EN 60065. [7]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 20/04/2017Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: ImporterCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 20/04/2017 [7]

Read the official alert ↗

Radio · A12/0793/17

Report published 2017-06-16 · notifying country Germany · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Portable FM radio with a mains cable and a 6 V DC socket to charge the built-in battery. [8]
Reported risk explanation: null The electrical insulation is inadequate which could lead to the mains voltage appearing on accessible parts.The product does not comply with the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive and the relevant European standard EN 60335. [8]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: RetailerCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: Unknown [8]

Read the official alert ↗

What this acquired cohort contains

41 distinct official alert references, published between 2006-01-27 and 2026-04-10. Counts describe the acquired reports, with no market denominator.

Report year	Recorded alerts
2006	2
2008	1
2009	1
2010	1
2011	1
2012	6
2013	14
2014	4
2015	3
2017	3
2018	1
2019	3
2026	1

Recorded risk labels within this evidence task

Label combinations are source facts within one comparison; they do not create separate guides with identical preparation tasks.

Electric shock: 34 recorded references
Electric shock, Fire: 7 recorded references

Source selection, exclusions and calculation method

Filter the acquired, completely parsed English weekly XML releases. Deduplicate official alert references. Group by product category and the complete set of conditional evidence-question topics supported by actual risk text. Risk-label combinations remain recorded cohort facets and do not create buyer intents. Brand, product name, model, origin, notifying country, measurement-only changes and different wording of the same questions do not create intents. Unrecognized mechanisms stay internal for enrichment. Count report years and notifying countries deterministically. Display at most eight newest descriptions with at least 40 characters after whitespace normalization, nonempty reported measures and distinct casefolded descriptions; break date ties by official identifier. All cohort records count even if their description is shorter or not displayed. This is not a representative sample. Counts concern this acquired corpus only.

One acquired version per official public alert reference. Display at most eight newest distinct product descriptions whose normalized whitespace-collapsed text contains at least 40 characters and has nonempty reported measures; ties sort by official identifier. The complete cohort includes shorter descriptions. This is an explicit display selection, not a representative sample.

8 distinct descriptions displayed; 33 cohort records not displayed. Missing fields: {'measures': 13}.

These are selected, dated enforcement observations in the acquired weekly reports, not a random market sample, market-wide failure rate, proof of current product status, or a determination about your product. Notification country is not a complete sales-market or jurisdiction-coverage field. A quoted legal/standard reference is the report’s statement, not independently verified current law or a mandatory test panel.

Calculation safety-gate-evidence-comparison-10; units recorded alerts; no incidence denominator.

Turn the reported failure mechanism into a scoped investigation

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

Power-supply insulation boundaries — what evidence do we have?
If your product uses a mains supply or adapter, identify the actual power-supply architecture, insulation boundaries and accessible parts. Ask a qualified specialist which design evidence and investigation would address the reported shock mechanism for this configuration. No medical-device standard or pass/fail limit is selected from this alert.
Useful evidence: Schematics, adapter/component specifications, ratings, insulation/protection design and configuration-specific existing test evidence.
Reported context: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]
Can we trace the affected component, formula or design revision across our supplied products?
Compare the reported descriptions with your own identifiers and change records. Treat missing or “Unknown” source fields as unresolved; they do not establish that no action was needed.
Useful evidence: Product identifiers, revision history, supplier/batch traceability and market/operator records.
Who would own an evidence review and any resulting corrective-action decision?
Read the reported measures as historical observations. Establish your own operator roles, sector-specific rules, decision owner and communication responsibilities before adopting another case’s response.
Useful evidence: Supply-chain responsibility map, applicable-law review, investigation scope and documented decision/communication workflow.

Work packages and dependencies

Conditional: Product-risk evidence and operator-role review — Compare the recorded product features and failure mechanism with your product. Confirm the applicable product regime, deciding evidence, operator responsibilities and justified next steps. This does not assume that GPSR or a representative appointment applies to every alert category.

Questions for providers

Which specific product features and reported risk mechanism make these cases relevant or irrelevant to our product?
What current legal, standards or scientific sources support your proposed investigation criteria, and what cannot be concluded from these dated alerts?
Which existing evidence can answer the risk question, what additional work is justified, and who owns any resulting corrective-action decision?

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.