Reported risk evidence comparison

Chemical products: labels/instructions — reported risk evidence

The acquired cohort contains 128 official alert references published from 2005-08-12 to 2026-09-25. This page compares 8 selected, distinct product descriptions, including glue, limescale remover, home fragrance. The other 120 records still contribute to the cohort counts but are not displayed: descriptions may repeat, lack the display inputs, or fall outside the eight-description display limit. The recorded risks raise separate evidence questions about labels/instructions. Compare the product features and dated findings below before scoping an investigation. These historical observations do not determine your product’s compliance or a market failure rate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Dated official observations

Compare the product features and reported failure mechanism

The source wording below describes the reported case at that time. Read each complete report before using it in an investigation.

Glue · SR/02616/26

Report published 2026-09-25 · notifying country France · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description
Liquid glue, advertised as super strong and waterproof, 10g. [1]
Reported risk explanation
The product contains cyanoacrylates that can bond skin and eyes in seconds. The product however does not display the required warnings and hazard labels. Therefore users are not properly informed about the dangers incurred when the product comes into contact with the skin and eyes. The product does not comply with the Regulation on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP). [1]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 15/07/2026Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Removal of this product listing by the online marketplaceDate of entry into force: 10/07/2026 [1]

Read the official alert ↗

Limescale remover · SR/02497/26

Report published 2026-09-18 · notifying country Latvia · reported origin Poland

Reported product description
Liquid limescale remover, 500 g. The product is labelled with pictogram GHS07 (exclamation mark); signal word “Warning”; hazard statements H315 (Causes skin irritation); H319 (Causes serious eye irritation);H412 (Harmful to aquatic life with long lasting effects). [2]
Reported risk explanation
The product is extremely acid (pH value of 0.67) and can cause severe skin corrosion (Category 1) and eye damage. The product is incorrectly labelled and the appropriate pictograms are missing. Users are therefore not properly informed about the dangers incurred when the product comes into contact with the skin and eyes. The product does not comply with the Regulation on the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP). [2]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Marking the product with appropriate warnings on the risksDate of entry into force: Unknown [2]

Read the official alert ↗

Home fragrance · OR/00104/26

Report published 2026-09-04 · notifying country France · reported origin France

Reported product description
Odour-neutralising home fragrance spray which can be used on clothes and household linen, 500 ml. [3]
Reported risk explanation
The product does not display the required warnings and hazard labels, such as that the product may cause an allergic reaction (due to the presence of ionone, methyl-, isoeugenol, hexyl salicylate), or may be harmful to aquatic life. Therefore users are not properly informed about the dangers incurred when the product comes into contact with the skin and eyes. The product does not comply with the Regulation on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP). [3]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): DistributorCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 06/05/2026 [3]

Read the official alert ↗

Rodenticide · SR/01506/26

Report published 2026-05-29 · notifying country Germany · reported origin Unknown

Reported product description
Concentrated rodenticide in pallet form against rodents. Product sold online, in particular via agro-fluid.de and rattengift.biz. [4]
Reported risk explanation
The product has not been authorised for sale to the general public. The product has an excessive concentration of brodifacoum (measured value: 0.05 g/kg by weight). Brodifacoum can cause inhibition of blood clotting, damage to blood vessels leading to internal bleeding and organ damage in case of ingestion. Moreover, the packaging does not have the required safety label, with other ingredient and risk-related indications in the national language. The user therefore lacks the necessary information on the dangers if the product comes into contact with the skin or if it is ingested. The product does not comply with the Biocidal Products Regulation nor with the Regulation on the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP). [4]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Ban on the marketing of the product and any accompanying measuresDate of entry into force: 02/12/2025Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): DistributorCategory of measure(s): Stop of salesDate of entry into force: 02/12/2025 [4]

Read the official alert ↗

Queen bees marking paint · SR/01404/26

Report published 2026-05-15 · notifying country France · reported origin Germany

Reported product description
Paint for marking queen bees, available in five colours: blue, white, yellow, red and green. [5]
Reported risk explanation
The Safety Data Sheet classifies this product as a flammable liquid that may cause eye irritation and organ toxicity. However, the product labelling omits the required hazard information, leaving users unaware of the dangers of the product. The product does not comply with the Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. [5]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): DistributorCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 22/08/2025Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): DistributorCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: Unknown [5]

Read the official alert ↗

Rodenticide · SR/00985/26

Report published 2026-04-10 · notifying country Sweden · reported origin Unknown

Reported product description
Concentrated rodenticide in pallet form against rodents. Product sold online, in particular via www.aspireang.com, www.lantecy.com, www.nexapest.com, www.espoowind.com. [6]
Reported risk explanation
Green pellet rodenticide, sold online to the general public, could be consumed by children, pets or other animals. The active substance is unknown, but the product is advertised as a rodenticide which will dehydrate and kill rodents. Moreover, the packaging does not have the required safety label, with risk-related indications in the national language. The user therefore lacks the necessary information on the dangers if the product comes into contact with the skin or if it is ingested. The product does not comply with the Biocidal Products Regulation nor with the Regulation on the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP). [6]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: DistributorCategory of measure(s): Stop of salesDate of entry into force: Unknown [6]

Read the official alert ↗

Rodenticide · SR/04522/25

Report published 2026-01-09 · notifying country France · reported origin Tunisia

Reported product description
Concentrated rodenticide in powder form against rats and mice, 3 grams. [7]
Reported risk explanation
The product contains alphachloralose (measured value 70%), a substance that is toxic if swallowed. Moreover, the product’s labelling lacks the required information which can lead the user to lack the necessary information about the dangers of the product. The product does not comply with the Biocidal Products Regulation nor with the Regulation on the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP). [7]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: OtherCategory of measure(s): Stop of salesDate of entry into force: 23/11/2025 [7]

Read the official alert ↗

Herbal product for smoking · SR/04036/25

Report published 2025-11-14 · notifying country Germany · reported origin Czechia

Reported product description
Herbal product for smoking in electronic cigarette. [8]
Reported risk explanation
According to the labelling, the product contains a psychoactive cannabinoid (10-OH-THC). This substance can cause mental and behavioural disorders. Moreover, safety information is missing, and its child-appealing design might lead to unintended use by children. The product does not comply with the General Product Safety Regulation. [8]
Reported measures, verbatim
Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): DistributorCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: Unknown [8]

Read the official alert ↗

What this acquired cohort contains

128 distinct official alert references, published between 2005-08-12 and 2026-09-25. Counts describe the acquired reports, with no market denominator.

Report yearRecorded alerts
20051
20065
20072
20082
20091
20101
20126
20136
20149
201512
20165
20171
20182
20197
20202
20216
202216
202311
20248
202517
20268

Recorded risk labels within this evidence task

Label combinations are source facts within one comparison; they do not create separate guides with identical preparation tasks.

Source selection, exclusions and calculation method

Filter the acquired, completely parsed English weekly XML releases. Deduplicate official alert references. Group by product category and the complete set of conditional evidence-question topics supported by actual risk text. Risk-label combinations remain recorded cohort facets and do not create buyer intents. Brand, product name, model, origin, notifying country, measurement-only changes and different wording of the same questions do not create intents. Unrecognized mechanisms stay internal for enrichment. Count report years and notifying countries deterministically. Display at most eight newest descriptions with at least 40 characters after whitespace normalization, nonempty reported measures and distinct casefolded descriptions; break date ties by official identifier. All cohort records count even if their description is shorter or not displayed. This is not a representative sample. Counts concern this acquired corpus only.

One acquired version per official public alert reference. Display at most eight newest distinct product descriptions whose normalized whitespace-collapsed text contains at least 40 characters and has nonempty reported measures; ties sort by official identifier. The complete cohort includes shorter descriptions. This is an explicit display selection, not a representative sample.

8 distinct descriptions displayed; 120 cohort records not displayed. Missing fields: {'measures': 7, 'description': 1}.

These are selected, dated enforcement observations in the acquired weekly reports, not a random market sample, market-wide failure rate, proof of current product status, or a determination about your product. Notification country is not a complete sales-market or jurisdiction-coverage field. A quoted legal/standard reference is the report’s statement, not independently verified current law or a mandatory test panel.

Calculation safety-gate-evidence-comparison-10; units recorded alerts; no incidence denominator.

Turn the reported failure mechanism into a scoped investigation

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

  1. Labels, instructions and actual use — what evidence do we have?

    Capture the exact label/instruction revision and destination/use context. Compare the information gap described in the report with your own product and current sector requirements, keeping a reported defect separate from a universal wording obligation.

    Useful evidence: Current labels/instructions, revision and market/translation records, use/risk information and reviewed applicable requirements.

    Reported context: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]

  2. Can we trace the affected component, formula or design revision across our supplied products?

    Compare the reported descriptions with your own identifiers and change records. Treat missing or “Unknown” source fields as unresolved; they do not establish that no action was needed.

    Useful evidence: Product identifiers, revision history, supplier/batch traceability and market/operator records.

  3. Who would own an evidence review and any resulting corrective-action decision?

    Read the reported measures as historical observations. Establish your own operator roles, sector-specific rules, decision owner and communication responsibilities before adopting another case’s response.

    Useful evidence: Supply-chain responsibility map, applicable-law review, investigation scope and documented decision/communication workflow.

Work packages and dependencies

Questions for providers

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.

Prepare an editable project brief

Confirm the facts, scope and contact preference before sharing your project. Preparing this page sends no provider outreach.

Choose work packages to discuss

Compare Find GPSR Responsible Person (EU/NI) | Compare & Get Quotes