Reported risk evidence comparison

Chemical products: child-resistant fastenings, labels/instructions — reported risk evidence

The acquired cohort contains 75 official alert references published from 2010-05-28 to 2026-10-02. This page compares 8 selected, distinct product descriptions, including glue, shoe glue, perfumed base for candles. The other 67 records still contribute to the cohort counts but are not displayed: descriptions may repeat, lack the display inputs, or fall outside the eight-description display limit. The recorded risks raise separate evidence questions about child-resistant fastenings, labels/instructions. Compare the product features and dated findings below before scoping an investigation. These historical observations do not determine your product’s compliance or a market failure rate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Dated official observations

Compare the product features and reported failure mechanism

The source wording below describes the reported case at that time. Read each complete report before using it in an investigation.

Glue · SR/02637/26

Report published 2026-10-02 · notifying country France · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Glue, intended for repairing footwear, 60 ml. [1]
Reported risk explanation: The product has an excessive concentration of 1,2-dichloroethane (measured value: 65.2% by weight). 1,2-dichloroethane may cause cancer if inhaled. The product does not display the required warnings and hazard labels and lacks child-resistant fastening. Therefore users are not properly informed about the dangers incurred when the product comes into contact with the skin and eyes. The product does not comply with the REACH Regulation nor with the Regulation on classification, labelling and packaging (CLP). [1]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Removal of this product listing by the online marketplaceDate of entry into force: 10/07/2026Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Warning consumers of the risksDate of entry into force: 15/07/2026 [1]

Read the official alert ↗

Shoe glue · SR/02624/26

Report published 2026-10-02 · notifying country France · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Shoe glue, 50 g. Manufacturing date: 10.10.2025. Expiry date: 9.10.2027. Unique formula identifier (UFI): FP00-D06P-A00M-CE3K. [2]
Reported risk explanation: The product contains an excessive amount of dichloromethane (measured value: 31.7% by weight), which affects the central nervous system, can impair the neuro-development and behaviour of the unborn child and might cause cancer when inhaled. Furthermore the product contains cyanoacrylates that can bond skin and eyes in seconds. The product however does not display the required warnings and hazard labels and lacks child-resistant fastening, and therefore users are not properly informed about the dangers incurred when the product comes into contact with the skin and eyes. The product does not comply with the REACH Regulation, nor with the Regulation on the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP). [2]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Removal of this product listing by the online marketplaceDate of entry into force: 10/07/2026Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Warning consumers of the risksDate of entry into force: 15/07/2026 [2]

Read the official alert ↗

Glue · SR/02627/26

Report published 2026-10-02 · notifying country France · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Liquid glue, advertised as super resistant, 20g. Date of manufacture: 20.8.2025 - Expiry date: 20.8.2027. [3]
Reported risk explanation: The product has an excessive concentration of dichloromethane (measured value: 19.3% by weight). Dichloromethane affects the central nervous system, can impair the neuro-development and behaviour of the unborn child and might cause cancer when inhaled. The product however does not display the required warnings and hazard labels and lacks child-resistant fastening. Therefore users are not properly informed about the dangers incurred when the product comes into contact with the skin and eyes. The product does not comply with the REACH Regulation nor with the Regulation on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP). [3]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Removal of this product listing by the online marketplaceDate of entry into force: 10/07/2026Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Warning consumers of the risksDate of entry into force: 15/07/2026 [3]

Read the official alert ↗

Glue · SR/02615/26

Report published 2026-09-25 · notifying country France · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Liquid, all-purpose glue, advertised as super strong, 20g. [4]
Reported risk explanation: The product contains an excessive amount of dichloromethane (measured value: 15.1% by weight), which affects the central nervous system, can impair the neuro-development and behaviour of the unborn child and might cause cancer when inhaled. Furthermore the product contains cyanoacrylates that can bond skin and eyes in seconds. The product however does not display the required warnings and hazard labels and lacks child-resistant fastening, and therefore users are not properly informed about the dangers incurred when the product comes into contact with the skin and eyes. The product does not comply with the REACH Regulation, nor with the Regulation on the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP). [4]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Warning consumers of the risksDate of entry into force: 15/09/2026Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Removal of this product listing by the online marketplaceDate of entry into force: 10/07/2026 [4]

Read the official alert ↗

Glue · SR/02159/26

Report published 2026-08-07 · notifying country France · reported origin People's Republic of China

Reported product description: Glue in two bottles of 50g each. Manufacturing date 02/06/2026 and expiry date /02/05/2029. [5]
Reported risk explanation: The product contains an excessive amount of dichloromethane (measured value: 39.5% by weight), which affects the central nervous system, can impair the neuro-development and behaviour of the unborn child and might cause cancer when inhaled. Furthermore the product contains cyanoacrylates that can bond skin and eyes in seconds. The product however does not display the required warnings and hazard labels and lacks child-resistant fastening, and therefore users are not properly informed about the dangers incurred when the product comes into contact with the skin and eyes. The product does not comply with the REACH Regulation, nor with the Regulation on the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP). [5]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): OtherCategory of measure(s): Removal of this product listing by the online marketplaceDate of entry into force: 24/06/2026 [5]

Read the official alert ↗

Perfumed base for candles · SR/01919/26

Report published 2026-07-03 · notifying country France · reported origin France

Reported product description: Perfume base for candles, 30 ml, 125 ml, 250 ml, 500 ml and 1 litre. [6]
Reported risk explanation: The product is classified as this product as posing an aspiration hazard and may cause eye and skin irritation and toxicity but lacks the required labelling, a child-resistant fastening and tactile warnings. The user is therefore not adequately informed about the risks when using this product. The product does not comply with the Regulation on the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP). [6]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: UnknownType of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ManufacturerCategory of measure(s): Recall of the product from end usersDate of entry into force: 12/06/2026 [6]

Read the official alert ↗

Glue · SR/00661/26

Report published 2026-03-06 · notifying country Sweden · reported origin United Kingdom

Reported product description: Epoxy adhesive consisting of 2 parts in separate plastic containers, 600g each. Product sold online. [7]
Reported risk explanation: One of the components of the product has an excessive concentration of bisphenol A (measured value up to 5% by weight). Bisphenol A has endocrine disrupting properties and affects the mammary glands, reproductive and immune systems and may impair brain's development and the behaviour. Additionally, the product lacks child-resistant fastening. Moreover, the labelling on the product does not include the appropriate hazard and warning information. The product does not comply with the Regulation on the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP). [7]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): DistributorCategory of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the marketDate of entry into force: 26/08/2025 [7]

Read the official alert ↗

Lamp oil · SR/03298/25

Report published 2025-09-19 · notifying country Germany · reported origin Unknown

Reported product description: Lamp oil, 1 litre. Product sold online, in particular via Amazon (ASIN: B0BXHXDXCP, B0BXHX2YMJ, B0BXJR85R8), Ebay, Etsy and Ambiancery.com. [8]
Reported risk explanation: The product lacks child-resistant fastening and lacks product and hazard information on the label making it difficult for adults to identify the product.Therefore both children and adults may consume the content of the bottles. Ingestion or aspiration of this liquid, due do its low viscosity combined with the high content of hydrocarbons in the mixture, may damage the lungs if it is swallowed and enters the airways. The product does not comply with the Regulation on the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP) nor with the REACH regulation. [8]
Reported measures, verbatim: Type of economic operator taking notified measure(s): ImporterCategory of measure(s): Ban on the marketing of the product and any accompanying measuresDate of entry into force: 24/06/2025 [8]

Read the official alert ↗

What this acquired cohort contains

75 distinct official alert references, published between 2010-05-28 and 2026-10-02. Counts describe the acquired reports, with no market denominator.

Report year	Recorded alerts
2010	1
2012	3
2014	5
2015	1
2016	16
2017	5
2020	3
2022	3
2023	9
2024	12
2025	6
2026	11

Recorded risk labels within this evidence task

Label combinations are source facts within one comparison; they do not create separate guides with identical preparation tasks.

Chemical: 72 recorded references
Chemical, Health risk / other: 2 recorded references
Health risk / other: 1 recorded references

Source selection, exclusions and calculation method

Filter the acquired, completely parsed English weekly XML releases. Deduplicate official alert references. Group by product category and the complete set of conditional evidence-question topics supported by actual risk text. Risk-label combinations remain recorded cohort facets and do not create buyer intents. Brand, product name, model, origin, notifying country, measurement-only changes and different wording of the same questions do not create intents. Unrecognized mechanisms stay internal for enrichment. Count report years and notifying countries deterministically. Display at most eight newest descriptions with at least 40 characters after whitespace normalization, nonempty reported measures and distinct casefolded descriptions; break date ties by official identifier. All cohort records count even if their description is shorter or not displayed. This is not a representative sample. Counts concern this acquired corpus only.

One acquired version per official public alert reference. Display at most eight newest distinct product descriptions whose normalized whitespace-collapsed text contains at least 40 characters and has nonempty reported measures; ties sort by official identifier. The complete cohort includes shorter descriptions. This is an explicit display selection, not a representative sample.

8 distinct descriptions displayed; 67 cohort records not displayed. Missing fields: {'measures': 3}.

These are selected, dated enforcement observations in the acquired weekly reports, not a random market sample, market-wide failure rate, proof of current product status, or a determination about your product. Notification country is not a complete sales-market or jurisdiction-coverage field. A quoted legal/standard reference is the report’s statement, not independently verified current law or a mandatory test panel.

Calculation safety-gate-evidence-comparison-10; units recorded alerts; no incidence denominator.

Turn the reported failure mechanism into a scoped investigation

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

Labels, instructions and actual use — what evidence do we have?
Capture the exact label/instruction revision and destination/use context. Compare the information gap described in the report with your own product and current sector requirements, keeping a reported defect separate from a universal wording obligation.
Useful evidence: Current labels/instructions, revision and market/translation records, use/risk information and reviewed applicable requirements.
Reported context: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]
Child-resistant fastening and chemical exposure — what evidence do we have?
Identify the actual closure/fastening design, packaged substance and foreseeable access/use. Compare the report’s physical fastening concern with your packaging and chemical-exposure facts. Review current product-specific requirements and justified evidence separately from label wording.
Useful evidence: Closure/packaging drawings, substance identity and composition, access/use context, supplier and batch traceability, and relevant existing closure evidence.
Reported context: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]
Can we trace the affected component, formula or design revision across our supplied products?
Compare the reported descriptions with your own identifiers and change records. Treat missing or “Unknown” source fields as unresolved; they do not establish that no action was needed.
Useful evidence: Product identifiers, revision history, supplier/batch traceability and market/operator records.
Who would own an evidence review and any resulting corrective-action decision?
Read the reported measures as historical observations. Establish your own operator roles, sector-specific rules, decision owner and communication responsibilities before adopting another case’s response.
Useful evidence: Supply-chain responsibility map, applicable-law review, investigation scope and documented decision/communication workflow.

Work packages and dependencies

Conditional: Product-risk evidence and operator-role review — Compare the recorded product features and failure mechanism with your product. Confirm the applicable product regime, deciding evidence, operator responsibilities and justified next steps. This does not assume that GPSR or a representative appointment applies to every alert category.

Questions for providers

Which specific product features and reported risk mechanism make these cases relevant or irrelevant to our product?
What current legal, standards or scientific sources support your proposed investigation criteria, and what cannot be concluded from these dated alerts?
Which existing evidence can answer the risk question, what additional work is justified, and who owns any resulting corrective-action decision?

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.