Cruxi
FDA record research
The 2021–2025 analysis contains 17 selected substantially-equivalent FDA decisions under primary product code OLP. Use it to compare documented submissions and evidence with your product. A separate 2026 update contains 1 decisions through 2026-09-27. The latest selected decision across the acquired endpoint is dated 2026-03-04. Neither set establishes a suitable predicate or the route for your device. The complete-year window has 17 decisions; the separate all-observed-date count is 51. These denominators describe different date ranges.
Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.
An exact FDA-record regulation_number match to one acquired Title 21 section. Records with the same normalized scope definition, class, regulation and recorded submission/GMP flags are grouped. Sparse definitions and generic exemption boilerplate do not qualify. No text-similarity equivalence or legal applicability is inferred.
The device is intended for over-the-counter (otc) use to treat patients with mild to moderate acne vulgaris. The device is intended to emit energy in the red and blue region of the spectrum, specifically indicated to treat mild to moderate acne vulgaris.
Compare the proposed indication, user, anatomy, technology and operating principle with this actual scope; record differences and unresolved facts.
§ 878.4810 Laser surgical instrument for use in general and plastic surgery and in dermatology. (a) Identification. (1) A carbon dioxide laser for use in general surgery and in dermatology is a laser device intended to cut, destroy, or remove tissue by light energy emitted by carbon dioxide. (2) An argon laser for use in dermatology is a laser device intended to destroy or coagulate tissue by light energy emitted by argon. (b) Classification. (1) Class II. (2) Class I for special laser gas mixtures used as a lasing medium for this class of lasers. The devices subject to this paragraph (b)(2) are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 878.9. [53 FR 23872, June 24, 1988, as amended at 61 FR 1123, Jan. 16, 1996; 66 FR 38803, July 25, 2001]
Read the identification, classification, conditions and referenced limitations in the cited section. A numeric reference match is not a buyer classification or exemption determination.
Historical FDA comparison
All statistics in this section use decisions dated 2021-01-01 to 2025-12-31. The partial 2026 update below is excluded from these distributions.
There are 17 valid recent date pairs. Distribution summaries require at least 20; older records are not substituted for a current benchmark.
Statistical source: FDA openFDA 510(k) decision dataset. Partition 1 Download the identified records and dates (CSV).
Deduplicate by official submission ID across the complete current manifest partitions. Select exact primary product code, K-number format and the stated SE decision codes with valid dates. Recent distributions use the five complete calendar years preceding the latest valid endpoint decision year. Partial-year counts compare equal January-to-cutoff periods. Quartiles use linear interpolation at (n-1)*p and are withheld below 20 valid date pairs. The analysis n describes only its declared complete-year window; selected_se_n separately counts all selected recorded dates through the cutoff.
51 selected records across all observed dates; 0 other/invalid identifier or decision-date records excluded. 0 missing or invalid date pairs in the five-year window.
Date fields: date_received → decision_date. Quantiles: Hyndman–Fan type 7: linear interpolation at (n − 1) × p; displayed to one decimal; n ≥ 20 valid pairs.
Receipt-to-decision calendar elapsed time includes time outside active FDA review; it is not FDA review time, a promised project timeline or an estimate of future clearance. This selected recorded cohort does not include all applications or establish a success probability, predicate suitability, market size, current market availability or legal authorization for another product.
Calculation fda-buyer-research-3 · database cutoff 2026-09-27. CSV rows identify each official K-number, cohort, date pair, exclusion reason and source version.
Separate partial-year update
1 selected decisions from 2026-01-01 to 2026-09-27. The equivalent previous-year period contains 3 decisions through 2025-09-27. These counts describe the records; they are not market growth or submission success rates.
Named records to investigate
These dated records may come from 2026 or earlier years. They are a separate investigation list, not the five-year statistical cohort. Compare the actual indications and technology before considering a record as a comparator.
| Official record / device | Recorded applicant | Decision | Recorded type | Calendar days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K253878 ↗LUSTRE GoGlow Advanced LED Patches (PR8001, PR9001) | Shenzhen Kaiyan Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. | 2026-03-04 | Traditional | 90 |
| K251843 ↗Erchonia EVRL | Erchonia Corporation | 2025-09-12 | Traditional | 88 |
| K242068 ↗LED Light Therapy Mask (RT01) | Ningbo Dechang Electrical Machinery Made Co.,Ltd | 2025-04-04 | Traditional | 263 |
| K243555 ↗LED light therapy mask (E43, E32, E49B, E49C, E100B, E100C, E103B, E104B, E106A, E108A) | Shenzhen Eyco Technology Co., Ltd. | 2025-02-05 | Traditional | 79 |
| K232656 ↗BLU TOTALE (Model: ENEOB852) | Premier North America, Inc. | 2023-11-14 | Traditional | 75 |
| K230490 ↗PMD Clean Acne, Model: 4004-CABLUE-NA, 4004-GREY-NA, 4004-YELLOW-NA, 4004-PSTO-NA, 4004-LPUR-NA, 4004-CABLUE-NA-INT, 4004-GREY-INT, 4004-YELLOW-INT, 4004-PSTO-INT, 4004-LPUR-INT | Dongguan Hunter Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. | 2023-10-27 | Traditional | 246 |
| K230720 ↗LUSTRE 3XPRESS Light Beauty Therapy patches, model: PR6001, PR5001 | Light Tree Ventures Europe B.V. | 2023-07-03 | Traditional | 109 |
| K213056 ↗LED Facial Mask | Shenzhen Osto Technology Company Limited | 2022-07-07 | Traditional | 288 |
Supporting documents actually acquired
Read the source context, then compare the evidence with your design. Topic locations below are text matches, including possible limitations or negative statements; they are not a mandatory test list.
The documents are a bounded sample of acquired summaries, not complete evidence coverage of the cohort.
Known context: US. Match the intended use and design with the recorded category before treating it as applicable.
| Source fact | Recorded value |
|---|---|
| FDA product code | OLP [1] |
| Generic device category | Over-The-Counter Powered Light Based Laser For Acne [1] |
| Recorded scope | The device is intended for over-the-counter (otc) use to treat patients with mild to moderate acne vulgaris. The device is intended to emit energy in the red and blue region of the spectrum, specifically indicated to treat mild to moderate acne vulgaris. [1] |
| Recorded class | 2 [1] |
| Regulation | 878.4810 [1] |
| Medical specialty | General, Plastic Surgery [1] |
Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.
Put your proposed label and design beside the quoted definition. Record matching facts, differences and missing facts separately; naming the category alone cannot resolve scope.
Useful evidence: Proposed indication/design and a definition-to-product comparison with source locators.
Record the applicable paragraph, conditions and cross-referenced limitations after specialist review. Keep a claimed exemption separate from actual establishment, listing and quality-system responsibilities.
Useful evidence: Dated classification/route rationale and the current provisions relied on, with unresolved conditions.
Choose a named record above. Put your proposed claim beside its actual indications-for-use statement. Record different patients, users, anatomy, settings and output claims; do not treat a shared code as proof of equivalence.
Useful evidence: Your draft indications for use + the selected official summary and its exact page.
For each comparison, record the different materials, hardware, software functions and operating conditions. Link each difference to existing evidence or an unresolved evaluation task.
Useful evidence: A three-column matrix: comparator fact / your design fact / evidence or unresolved gap.
This recent cohort has fewer than 20 valid date pairs, so it supplies no median or percentile benchmark. Ask for a schedule based on actual preparation, evidence gaps, interactions and response assumptions; keep any historical decision context separately dated.
Useful evidence: Document/test readiness, unresolved route/evidence tasks and the assumptions behind the specialist’s proposed sequence.
Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.
2026-10-05 · retrieved 2026-10-06
Source key D01 · snapshot 936de5f5d47b9293b702fc32512a79173969fb788c74a63d9b91abe73f3b86a5
Tue, 07 Apr 2026 11:21:05 GMT · retrieved 2026-10-06
Source key D02 · snapshot 7383ddefe5845c090a1fee05216e1789225c57ddb45b6f28d977a7af552e4bb3
2026-10-05 · retrieved 2026-10-06
Source key D01 · snapshot 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002
Mon, 06 Oct 2025 13:21:18 GMT · retrieved 2026-10-07
Source key D02 · snapshot f6b5326cfddc047357c2e6a3f7006133491a8d9bbe24b3eca6604f38376fab45
Mon, 05 May 2025 10:19:49 GMT · retrieved 2026-10-07
Source key D02 · snapshot e15728473dda91a5194296e41189b0b06cddf1ddd0acaf22d9a591b4a20458a3
Thu, 01 Oct 2026 22:01:48 GMT · retrieved 2026-10-06
Source key D04 · snapshot 2fb992918a3879de132b47a33c856da2b3234ee3d96cfd79fab03acf30512496
Confirm the facts, scope and contact preference before sharing your project. Preparing this page sends no provider outreach.
Compare FDA 510(k) Submission Services
Find FDA US Agent Services | Compare & Get Quotes · FDA QMSR Transition & Inspection Readiness (ISO 13485 Alignment)