FDA record research

Orthopaedic Surgical Planning And Instrument Guides (PBF) — FDA decisions, comparisons and evidence

The 2021–2025 analysis contains 21 selected substantially-equivalent FDA decisions under primary product code PBF. Use it to compare documented submissions and evidence with your product. A separate 2026 update contains 1 decisions through 2026-09-27. The latest selected decision across the acquired endpoint is dated 2026-03-27. Neither set establishes a suitable predicate or the route for your device. The complete-year window has 21 decisions; the separate all-observed-date count is 27. These denominators describe different date ranges.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Recorded scope and its declared regulatory reference

An exact FDA-record regulation_number match to one acquired Title 21 section. Records with the same normalized scope definition, class, regulation and recorded submission/GMP flags are grouped. Sparse definitions and generic exemption boilerplate do not qualify. No text-similarity equivalence or legal applicability is inferred.

What scope does the FDA record describe?

As a surgical instrument to assist in pre-operative planning and/or guiding the marking of bone and/or guide surgical instruments for orthopedic surgical procedures.

Compare the proposed indication, user, anatomy, technology and operating principle with this actual scope; record differences and unresolved facts.

Cited source

Which current section does the record cite?

§ 888.3030 Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories. (a) Identification. Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories are devices intended to be implanted consisting of one or more metallic components and their metallic fasteners. The devices contain a plate, a nail/plate combination, or a blade/plate combination that are made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, stainless steel, and titanium, that are intended to be held in position with fasteners, such as screws and nails, or bolts, nuts, and washers. These devices are used for fixation of fractures of the proximal or distal end of long bones, such as intracapsular, intertrochanteric, intercervical, supracondylar, or condylar fractures of the femur; for fusion of a joint; or for surgical procedures that involve cutting a bone. The devices may be implanted or attached through the skin so that a pulling force (traction) may be applied to the skeletal system. (b) Classification. Class II.

Read the identification, classification, conditions and referenced limitations in the cited section. A numeric reference match is not a buyer classification or exemption determination.

Cited source

Historical FDA comparison

2021–2025: five complete calendar years

Primary code PBF

All statistics in this section use decisions dated 2021-01-01 to 2025-12-31. The partial 2026 update below is excluded from these distributions.

21Selected decisions in these five years
211.0Median receipt-to-decision calendar days
21Valid date pairs in the distribution

The middle 50% of the 21 valid date pairs spans 90.0–314.0 calendar days. This describes selected recorded submissions, including elapsed time outside active FDA review. It is not an FDA review-time measure or a delivery promise.

20212
20223
20235
20243
20258

Compare like submission types

Recorded typeDecisionsValid date pairsMedian calendar daysMiddle 50%
Special22Withheld: n < 20—
Traditional1919Withheld: n < 20—

Different submission types and evidence packages are not interchangeable. These selected records do not establish that a particular route is available for your product.

Statistical source: FDA openFDA 510(k) decision dataset. Partition 1 Download the identified records and dates (CSV).

Filters, exclusions and reproducible calculation

Deduplicate by official submission ID across the complete current manifest partitions. Select exact primary product code, K-number format and the stated SE decision codes with valid dates. Recent distributions use the five complete calendar years preceding the latest valid endpoint decision year. Partial-year counts compare equal January-to-cutoff periods. Quartiles use linear interpolation at (n-1)*p and are withheld below 20 valid date pairs. The analysis n describes only its declared complete-year window; selected_se_n separately counts all selected recorded dates through the cutoff.

27 selected records across all observed dates; 0 other/invalid identifier or decision-date records excluded. 0 missing or invalid date pairs in the five-year window.

Date fields: date_received → decision_date. Quantiles: Hyndman–Fan type 7: linear interpolation at (n − 1) × p; displayed to one decimal; n ≥ 20 valid pairs.

Receipt-to-decision calendar elapsed time includes time outside active FDA review; it is not FDA review time, a promised project timeline or an estimate of future clearance. This selected recorded cohort does not include all applications or establish a success probability, predicate suitability, market size, current market availability or legal authorization for another product.

Calculation fda-buyer-research-3 · database cutoff 2026-09-27. CSV rows identify each official K-number, cohort, date pair, exclusion reason and source version.

Separate partial-year update

2026 decisions through 2026-09-27

1 selected decisions from 2026-01-01 to 2026-09-27. The equivalent previous-year period contains 3 decisions through 2025-09-27. These counts describe the records; they are not market growth or submission success rates.

Named records to investigate

Latest decisions across the database

These dated records may come from 2026 or earlier years. They are a separate investigation list, not the five-year statistical cohort. Compare the actual indications and technology before considering a record as a comparator.

Official record / deviceRecorded applicantDecisionRecorded typeCalendar days
K252064 ↗MedCAD® AccuStride™ SystemMedcad2026-03-27Traditional269
K250711 ↗VSP Orthopedics System3D Systems, Inc.2025-12-05Traditional270
K242603 ↗MyPAO SA guidesMedacta International S.A.2025-11-19Traditional446
K251709 ↗MedCAD® AccuStride™ SystemMedcad2025-11-04Traditional154
K250394 ↗Fine TTO™Bodycad Laboratories, Inc.2025-10-21Traditional251
K250767 ↗Newclip Patient-matched instrumentation non sterile PSINewclip Technics2025-10-01Traditional202
K250921 ↗CORIOGRAPH Pre-Op Planning and Modeling ServicesBlue Belt Technologies, Inc.2025-06-25Traditional90
K241811 ↗MedCAD® AccuStride™ SystemMedcad2025-03-13Traditional265

Supporting documents actually acquired

Go beyond the database row

Read the source context, then compare the evidence with your design. Topic locations below are text matches, including possible limitations or negative statements; they are not a mandatory test list.

The documents are a bounded sample of acquired summaries, not complete evidence coverage of the cohort.

Recorded classification context

Known context: US. Match the intended use and design with the recorded category before treating it as applicable.

Source factRecorded value
FDA product codePBF [1]
Generic device categoryOrthopaedic Surgical Planning And Instrument Guides [1]
Recorded scopeAs a surgical instrument to assist in pre-operative planning and/or guiding the marking of bone and/or guide surgical instruments for orthopedic surgical procedures. [1]
Recorded class2 [1]
Regulation888.3030 [1]
Medical specialtyOrthopedic [1]

Build a comparison that explains the differences

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

  1. Which specific part of the recorded scope fits or differs?

    Put your proposed label and design beside the quoted definition. Record matching facts, differences and missing facts separately; naming the category alone cannot resolve scope.

    Useful evidence: Proposed indication/design and a definition-to-product comparison with source locators.

  2. Have the cited section and its limitations been reviewed?

    Record the applicable paragraph, conditions and cross-referenced limitations after specialist review. Keep a claimed exemption separate from actual establishment, listing and quality-system responsibilities.

    Useful evidence: Dated classification/route rationale and the current provisions relied on, with unresolved conditions.

  3. Compare your intended use with a named decision

    Choose a named record above. Put your proposed claim beside its actual indications-for-use statement. Record different patients, users, anatomy, settings and output claims; do not treat a shared code as proof of equivalence.

    Useful evidence: Your draft indications for use + the selected official summary and its exact page.

  4. Explain the technology and evidence differences

    For each comparison, record the different materials, hardware, software functions and operating conditions. Link each difference to existing evidence or an unresolved evaluation task.

    Useful evidence: A three-column matrix: comparator fact / your design fact / evidence or unresolved gap.

  5. Make the estimate comparable

    Use the 2021–2025 cohort, and compare the recorded submission type before discussing calendar elapsed time. Separate your own preparation work from the recorded receipt-to-decision period.

    Useful evidence: Chosen K numbers, submission types, dates and your own document/test readiness.

Work packages and dependencies

What needs to happen first

Questions for providers

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.

FDA openFDA — device classification records ↗

2026-10-05 · retrieved 2026-10-06

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D01 · snapshot 936de5f5d47b9293b702fc32512a79173969fb788c74a63d9b91abe73f3b86a5

  • [1] device-classification-0001-of-0001.json:results[983] · record a239d5516c25517aeffb7f46be78f0787f558269b977d9e0f51bf2ab3b157c90

FDA 510(k) summary — K252064 ↗

Tue, 07 Apr 2026 11:02:19 GMT · retrieved 2026-10-06

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot 90315a78261599e7ebeccd5e3d8e8bfc23896df25b611eba7e500af98970757e

  • [2] PDF page 6 · record e5134da095ef0be5ef4f1bb60889f72d5ab6a0ef282c4fd044530c2dbb185782
  • [3] PDF page 7 · record f9a0744e230f3ab893dc4a7707aec88668dcc143885fec5b4f8a79279c9035c3

FDA 510(k) summary — K242603 ↗

Fri, 05 Dec 2025 20:48:07 GMT · retrieved 2026-10-07

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot d2e054feac30b9a3681de4c02ca698e063f7b00c5bcd5321d2ba5d6bfc6f0f0c

  • [5] PDF page 6 · record f2e22b34e33fb1dca35042cc2bce1ea13551cb96b46ed2218adda30bd12fe7b8
  • [6] PDF page 8 · record 34eaab8c3e183be6296af46496336b3b1e649294e172a3b7f87c722fdaf61fe5

Prepare an editable project brief

Confirm the facts, scope and contact preference before sharing your project. Preparing this page sends no provider outreach.

Choose work packages to discuss

Compare FDA 510(k) Submission Services

Find FDA US Agent Services | Compare & Get Quotes · FDA QMSR Transition & Inspection Readiness (ISO 13485 Alignment)