Recorded device evidence

Ossiclear (Ossiclear System) (K254296): indications, design and recorded evidence

The acquired K254296 file contains product-specific indications and users, design and operating principle, non-clinical evidence actually described, clinical evidence or its stated absence sections. Compare these dated manufacturer statements with your own indication and design before commissioning evidence work. They describe this submission; they do not prescribe your testing, validate performance independently or establish a suitable predicate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Computed exact-code research

This decision beside its recorded product-code cohort

The 2021–2025 complete-year cohort contains 6 selected decisions under primary code LXB. 6 have valid reported receipt/decision pairs; 0 pairs are missing or invalid.

No quartiles are displayed: this complete-year cohort has fewer than 20 valid pairs.

The table shows the named decision and up to four latest exact-code research records through 2026-09-27. It can include partial-year records outside the complete-year cohort. The quartiles above use the full stated cohort, not this displayed selection.

Research recordRecorded deviceReceipt → decisionCalendar elapsed daysRecorded submission type
K254296 ↗ · this pageOssiclear (Ossiclear System)2025-12-31 → 2026-07-22203Traditional
K253431 ↗Bone conduction Hearing Aid (BM100, BM300, BM310, SHOKZHEAR BM400, SHOKZ BM400MN, SHOKZHEAR BM410, SHOKZHEAR BM410MN, SHOKZHEAR BM420 and SHOKZHEAR BM420MN)2025-10-01 → 2026-08-19322Traditional
K260452 ↗Bone Conduction Hearing Aid (G41157, G41158, G41159, G41160, G42151, G42152, G42153, G42154, G42155, G42156, G42157, G42158, G42159, G42160, G43151, G43152, G43153, G43154, G43155, G43156, G45151, G45152, G45153, G45154, G45155, G45156, G45157, G45158, G45159, G45160, G46151, G46152, G46153, G46154, G46155, G46156, G46157, G46158)2026-02-11 → 2026-06-15124Traditional
K261256 ↗Bone Conduction Hearing Aid (XTS-AISW-D1, XTS-AISW-D2, XTS-AISW-D3)2026-04-16 → 2026-06-1156Traditional
K250215 ↗Baha 7 Sound Processor; Baha Fitting Software 7 (P2121898); Baha Smart App (iOS) (P1646054); Baha Smart App (Android) (P1646035); Baha SoundBand2025-01-24 → 2025-05-29125Traditional

Use this comparison: select a record to investigate, read its actual indications and design, and document differences. A shared code or elapsed period cannot establish its relevance to your device.

Calendar elapsed days are not active FDA review time, a promised schedule or a success probability. The selection includes only the stated recorded decisions, not all applications. Latest records can postdate the named historical decision and are contextual research, not its predicates. Shared codes, summaries and observed records do not prove equivalence, current market availability, buyer applicability or predicate suitability.

Calculation, selection and source versions

Reuse the complete-endpoint exact-primary-code, documented SE-decision cohort and its stated cutoff/window. Retain its type-7 quartiles only when at least 20 valid date pairs are present. Independently subtract the named official record’s receipt date from its decision date; missing or negative pairs remain unknown. Show up to four latest exact-code research records, excluding the named ID. Parent analysis hash, source snapshots and calculation versions are retained.

Calculation: fda-named-decision-cohort-context-1; cutoff 2026-09-27; 0 parent records excluded; units record counts; calendar elapsed days.

Source snapshots: 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002.

Read beyond the decision row

Recorded evidence and differences to investigate

The summary is manufacturer-submitted context hosted by FDA. Negative/no-study statements are preserved. Evidence themes are not binding legal requirements.

Short opening excerpts identify the source sections. Read the linked original for the full study context, negative statements, tables and limitations. Public quotations are limited to 120 words per acquired summary; the internal evidence packet retains exact section ranges for review.

Indications and users

K254296 · PDF page 4 ↗ Source 2

Ossiclear System is indicated for the following patients aged 12 years and older:

• Patients who have a conductive or mixed hearing loss and can still benefit from sound  amplification.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

Design and operating principle

K254296 · PDF page 6 ↗ Source 3

The Ossiclear System is a non-invasive bone conduction hearing aid intended to improve  hearing by
 transmitting  sound  vibrations  through  bone  to  the  cochlea.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

Non-clinical evidence actually described

K254296 · PDF page 11 ↗ Source 4

The   Ossiclear   System   underwent   non‑clinical   bench   testing   to   verify   compliance   with   design
  specifications  and  demonstrate  substantial  equivalence  to  the  predicate  device.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Treat these as documented evidence themes in this case, including any limitations or negative statements. Ask which protocols, design inputs and acceptance rationale would be justified for your product; these excerpts are not a mandatory test panel.

Clinical evidence or its stated absence

K254296 · PDF page 12 ↗ Source 5

No  clinical  data  required  for  substantial  equivalence;  non-clinical  performance  and  technological
  comparability are sufficient.

Compare with your product: Preserve whether the summary describes clinical evidence or says none was performed. This recorded case does not determine whether your product needs clinical evidence.

Extraction selection and limits

Select observed whole-line section headings or explicit colon-delimited inline labels on readable PDF pages, including the explicitly documented heading-spacing variants in this parser version. Preserve the original heading, character ranges and layout; do not repair excerpt text. Exclude letter boilerplate and uncertain pages. Stop at observed table headings; do not infer table columns or scalar results from layout text. Multi-column or suspicious split-numeric excerpts are excluded until reviewed alternate extraction is available. Original layout records remain retained; any alternate text has its own extractor-version locator and requires original-page review. For each dimension, prefer usable versioned alternate text where available, selecting its longest usable excerpt; otherwise select the longest usable original-layout excerpt. Ties preserve source order. Bounded to 64 PDF pages and 3,500 characters per section. This is a selection, not a complete dossier analysis.

Excluded extraction items: {}.

Known facts and deciding inputs

Known context: US. Confirm the organisation’s role, relevant activities and markets against the cited criteria.

Source factRecorded valueWhat to check
510(k) identifierK254296 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Generic device categoryOssiclear (Ossiclear System) [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded applicantSounduct [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
FDA product codeLXB [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Decision date2026-07-22 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded decision codeSESE [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Submission typeTraditional [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Receipt date2025-12-31 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.

Prepare a differences and evidence worksheet

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

  1. Indications and users — what differs in our product?

    Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

    Useful evidence: Our proposed indication, user/population and use environment beside this exact recorded indication.

  2. Design and operating principle — what differs in our product?

    Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

    Useful evidence: Design description, materials/components, accessory list and a differences matrix.

  3. Non-clinical evidence actually described — what differs in our product?

    Treat these as documented evidence themes in this case, including any limitations or negative statements. Ask which protocols, design inputs and acceptance rationale would be justified for your product; these excerpts are not a mandatory test panel.

    Useful evidence: Existing protocols/results and design-specific evidence gaps, with standard editions and scope reviewed separately.

  4. Clinical evidence or its stated absence — what differs in our product?

    Preserve whether the summary describes clinical evidence or says none was performed. This recorded case does not determine whether your product needs clinical evidence.

    Useful evidence: Your proposed claims and supporting evidence, plus a reviewed rationale for clinical-evidence needs.

Work packages and dependencies

Questions for providers

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.

FDA openFDA — 510(k) decision records ↗

2026-10-05 · retrieved 2026-10-06

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D01 · snapshot 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002

  • [1] device-510k-0001-of-0001.json:results[123518] · record f6652f31fbbe6283f3229da173ef343d1c820378c965b7f96a4f46a91c8e741e
  • [6] Complete results array / fda-decision-context:K254296 · record whole dataset partition

FDA 510(k) summary — K254296 ↗

Fri, 07 Aug 2026 21:34:34 GMT · retrieved 2026-10-07

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot 4c66b8ab7396604d3408e805ffdb1d9972fe5841dc95e17a6f62f30763ffa692

  • [2] PDF page 4 · record 9f784d027ec9705869284047afabed90fb31f35d8a12f8009794e0e22c9364c7
  • [3] PDF page 6 · record 85aaa725dd210c0e1ef46b50c2e536a06294aaed8f42fdebb493772567d10c5c
  • [4] PDF page 11 · record a50b227257b378ff47815b9657ee4b2a8e465b582e05724a20c8f95710e42330
  • [5] PDF page 12 · record 49ce65e4a44e4e2d7baf93e732d4a01840a9e274a980a02b3b875089768fbf7c

Prepare an editable project brief

Confirm the facts, scope and contact preference before sharing your project. Preparing this page sends no provider outreach.

Choose work packages to discuss

Compare FDA 510(k) Submission Services