Recorded device evidence

F6S Full Face Mask (F6S); P6S Nasal Pillows Interface (P6S) (K253166): indications, design and recorded evidence

The acquired K253166 file contains product-specific indications and users, design and operating principle, non-clinical evidence actually described sections. Compare these dated manufacturer statements with your own indication and design before commissioning evidence work. They describe this submission; they do not prescribe your testing, validate performance independently or establish a suitable predicate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Computed exact-code research

This decision beside its recorded product-code cohort

The 2021–2025 complete-year cohort contains 32 selected decisions under primary code BZD. 32 have valid reported receipt/decision pairs; 0 pairs are missing or invalid.

Calendar elapsed days: lower quartile 135.5, median 207.0, upper quartile 259.8. These are recorded calendar differences, not active FDA review time.

The table shows the named decision and up to four latest exact-code research records through 2026-09-27. It can include partial-year records outside the complete-year cohort. The quartiles above use the full stated cohort, not this displayed selection.

Research recordRecorded deviceReceipt → decisionCalendar elapsed daysRecorded submission type
K253166 ↗ · this pageF6S Full Face Mask (F6S); P6S Nasal Pillows Interface (P6S)2025-09-26 → 2026-04-29215Traditional
K261262 ↗Altis Full Face Mask2026-04-16 → 2026-09-25162Traditional
K253044 ↗RXiBreeze PAP System (RXiBreeze 20C)2025-09-22 → 2026-07-23304Traditional
K253553 ↗Orion2025-11-14 → 2026-06-04202Traditional
K254104 ↗ResScan Essentials2025-12-19 → 2026-05-27159Traditional

Use this comparison: select a record to investigate, read its actual indications and design, and document differences. A shared code or elapsed period cannot establish its relevance to your device.

Calendar elapsed days are not active FDA review time, a promised schedule or a success probability. The selection includes only the stated recorded decisions, not all applications. Latest records can postdate the named historical decision and are contextual research, not its predicates. Shared codes, summaries and observed records do not prove equivalence, current market availability, buyer applicability or predicate suitability.

Calculation, selection and source versions

Reuse the complete-endpoint exact-primary-code, documented SE-decision cohort and its stated cutoff/window. Retain its type-7 quartiles only when at least 20 valid date pairs are present. Independently subtract the named official record’s receipt date from its decision date; missing or negative pairs remain unknown. Show up to four latest exact-code research records, excluding the named ID. Parent analysis hash, source snapshots and calculation versions are retained.

Calculation: fda-named-decision-cohort-context-1; cutoff 2026-09-27; 0 parent records excluded; units record counts; calendar elapsed days.

Source snapshots: 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002.

Read beyond the decision row

Recorded evidence and differences to investigate

The summary is manufacturer-submitted context hosted by FDA. Negative/no-study statements are preserved. Evidence themes are not binding legal requirements.

Short opening excerpts identify the source sections. Read the linked original for the full study context, negative statements, tables and limitations. Public quotations are limited to 120 words per acquired summary; the internal evidence packet retains exact section ranges for review.

Indications and users

K253166 · PDF page 7 ↗ Source 2

The indications for use for the subject device Nasal Pillows Interface (P6S) is identical to the
predicate.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

Design and operating principle

K253166 · PDF page 5 ↗ Source 3

The Full Face Mask (F6S) and the Nasal Pillows Interface (P6S) are both intended to provide an
interface for patients who have been prescribed CPAP or bi-level therapy.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

Non-clinical evidence actually described

K253166 · PDF page 6 ↗ Source 4

Performance testing demonstrated that the subject device met its acceptance criteria. Testing included,
evaluation of deadspace, exhaust flow, pressure drop, CO₂ rebreathing, cleaning validation, aging,
transportation, and sound power and pressure levels.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Treat these as documented evidence themes in this case, including any limitations or negative statements. Ask which protocols, design inputs and acceptance rationale would be justified for your product; these excerpts are not a mandatory test panel.

Extraction selection and limits

Select observed whole-line section headings or explicit colon-delimited inline labels on readable PDF pages, including the explicitly documented heading-spacing variants in this parser version. Preserve the original heading, character ranges and layout; do not repair excerpt text. Exclude letter boilerplate and uncertain pages. Stop at observed table headings; do not infer table columns or scalar results from layout text. Multi-column or suspicious split-numeric excerpts are excluded until reviewed alternate extraction is available. Original layout records remain retained; any alternate text has its own extractor-version locator and requires original-page review. For each dimension, prefer usable versioned alternate text where available, selecting its longest usable excerpt; otherwise select the longest usable original-layout excerpt. Ties preserve source order. Bounded to 64 PDF pages and 3,500 characters per section. This is a selection, not a complete dossier analysis.

Excluded extraction items: {}.

Historical references beside dated FDA recognition metadata

Read each mention in the linked original summary, including statements that testing was not performed. Recognition metadata does not determine your testing needs, chosen edition or transition eligibility.

Reference in this historical summaryDesignation in the acquired FDA exportRecognition / entry dateRecorded transition-expiration dateSources
ISO 17510:2015
Non-clinical Testing
ISO 17510 First Edition 2015-08-01
Medical devices - Sleep apnoea breathing therapy - Masks and application accessories
1-106 · Partial
04/04/2016
12/19/2027Summary [4] · Metadata [5]
Read scope and recognition limits ↗
ISO 17510:2015
Non-clinical Testing
ISO 17510 Second Edition 2025-11
Medical devices - Sleep apnoea breathing therapy - Masks and application accessories
1-197 · Complete
12/22/2025
Not recorded in this export rowSummary [4] · Metadata [6]
Read scope and recognition limits ↗
ISO 5356-1:2015
Non-clinical Testing
ISO 5356-1 Third edition 2004-05-15
Anaesthetic and respiratory equipment - Conical connectors: Part 1: Cones and sockets
1-62 · Complete
03/16/2012
Not recorded in this export rowSummary [4] · Metadata [7]
Read scope and recognition limits ↗
ISO 5356-1:2015
Non-clinical Testing
ANSI AAMI ISO 5356-1:2004
Anaesthetic and Respiratory Equipment - Conical Connectors - Part 1: Cones and Sockets
1-62 · Complete
03/16/2012
Not recorded in this export rowSummary [4] · Metadata [8]
Read scope and recognition limits ↗

Prepare for your provider: the proposed protocol/report edition, its justification for your device and the complete current FDA recognition sheet. In particular, inspect exclusions for partial recognition. An edition difference does not automatically make the historical evidence unusable.

Identifier-matching method and selection limits

Match explicit ISO/IEC identifiers in selected preserved summary excerpts to the acquired, count-reconciled FDA metadata export. Preserve the historical edition mention, current snapshot designations, entry dates, recognition extent and any recorded transition-expiration date as separate facts. No title-similarity, edition-equivalence, test-mandate or transition-eligibility inference. At most twenty matched occurrences and thirty metadata rows per reference; wide matches are held for separate review.

2 of 2 matched reference occurrences shown.

Known facts and deciding inputs

Known context: US. Confirm the organisation’s role, relevant activities and markets against the cited criteria.

Source factRecorded valueWhat to check
510(k) identifierK253166 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Generic device categoryF6S Full Face Mask (F6S); P6S Nasal Pillows Interface (P6S) [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded applicantBMC Medical Co., Ltd. [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
FDA product codeBZD [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Decision date2026-04-29 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded decision codeSESE [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Submission typeTraditional [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Receipt date2025-09-26 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.

Prepare a differences and evidence worksheet

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

  1. Indications and users — what differs in our product?

    Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

    Useful evidence: Our proposed indication, user/population and use environment beside this exact recorded indication.

  2. Design and operating principle — what differs in our product?

    Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

    Useful evidence: Design description, materials/components, accessory list and a differences matrix.

  3. Non-clinical evidence actually described — what differs in our product?

    Treat these as documented evidence themes in this case, including any limitations or negative statements. Ask which protocols, design inputs and acceptance rationale would be justified for your product; these excerpts are not a mandatory test panel.

    Useful evidence: Existing protocols/results and design-specific evidence gaps, with standard editions and scope reviewed separately.

  4. Which edition and recognition limits would our provider rely on?

    Compare each historical reference below with the dated FDA metadata. Ask the specialist to justify the applicable scope and selected edition, read the complete supplementary sheet for partial-recognition exclusions, and investigate any recorded transition conditions. A difference in editions does not automatically make the earlier study unusable.

    Useful evidence: Proposed protocol/report edition, dated FDA recognition sheet with scope/exclusions, and a documented edition/transition rationale for the actual device.

Work packages and dependencies

Questions for providers

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.

FDA openFDA — 510(k) decision records ↗

2026-10-05 · retrieved 2026-10-06

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D01 · snapshot 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002

  • [1] device-510k-0001-of-0001.json:results[3141] · record ed1b4e0d7d604b2e136a43a0d2ad5f2da55a207541908689a0ca4912a569e736
  • [9] Complete results array / fda-decision-context:K253166 · record whole dataset partition

FDA 510(k) summary — K253166 ↗

Mon, 04 May 2026 20:50:09 GMT · retrieved 2026-10-07

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot 77224166b2c8dc84fb8385cc628d6a504091175a5b46396f41c3dd9df954d200

  • [2] PDF page 7 · record 093273f23d916076821e54b4c002110a45ff399a091e2dc7afd0995838bd003d
  • [3] PDF page 5 · record eadf2fff2ed27daa63c9a75640fa5d2a834bd2266ba6a855aa629a17905e4bd4
  • [4] PDF page 6 · record 4dcbd73f299ebe8d69e2e8c9da7436597ef5bbf53d94368442c7e540b70b847a

FDA — recognition metadata exported through the official search form ↗

Version not stated by the source · retrieved 2026-10-07

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot 94ccf56dc846c7f6d78d6ad77dc6e87d1803ac3612af01d6894949e34c4a78d8

  • [5] CSV row 1503 · record 56fbafc791ce08baf02b5d2b330c430876b8e0e3ef2e84d3f7272ff8dc13de42
  • [6] CSV row 77 · record 8f6ffd67272b2dcb7b098da6e5e85fdeb48d9ea77802e340fdb5bd0d054ba7b1
  • [7] CSV row 1803 · record af0ed4c5d3a0c55024f5e51e12eb9a38d6f1cdaf9ba3561ba48b1a60279fee3d
  • [8] CSV row 1804 · record 9be476a6337ed8f39887ea3e1d4f67a220c392fc5c78ae45af8f386d3e7a1cb9

Prepare an editable project brief

Confirm the facts, scope and contact preference before sharing your project. Preparing this page sends no provider outreach.

Choose work packages to discuss

Compare FDA 510(k) Submission Services