Recorded device evidence

NIM Essence™ EMG Endotracheal Tube (NIMEID060); NIM Essence™ EMG Endotracheal Tube (NIMEID065); NIM Essence™ EMG Endotracheal Tube (NIMEID070); NIM Essence™ EMG Endotracheal Tube (NIMEID075); NIM Essence™ EMG Endotracheal Tube (NIMEID080) (K251672): indications, design and recorded evidence

The acquired K251672 file contains product-specific indications and users, design and operating principle, performance evidence actually described, clinical evidence or its stated absence sections. Compare these dated manufacturer statements with your own indication and design before commissioning evidence work. They describe this submission; they do not prescribe your testing, validate performance independently or establish a suitable predicate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Computed exact-code research

This decision beside its recorded product-code cohort

The 2021–2025 complete-year cohort contains 11 selected decisions under primary code ETN. 11 have valid reported receipt/decision pairs; 0 pairs are missing or invalid.

No quartiles are displayed: this complete-year cohort has fewer than 20 valid pairs.

The table shows the named decision and up to four latest exact-code research records through 2026-09-27. It can include partial-year records outside the complete-year cohort. The quartiles above use the full stated cohort, not this displayed selection.

Research recordRecorded deviceReceipt → decisionCalendar elapsed daysRecorded submission type
K251672 ↗ · this pageNIM Essence™ EMG Endotracheal Tube (NIMEID060); NIM Essence™ EMG Endotracheal Tube (NIMEID065); NIM Essence™ EMG Endotracheal Tube (NIMEID070); NIM Essence™ EMG Endotracheal Tube (NIMEID075); NIM Essence™ EMG Endotracheal Tube (NIMEID080)2025-05-30 → 2026-02-10256Traditional
K253536 ↗Evala Nerve Stimulator (EPNR002)2025-11-13 → 2026-02-27106Traditional
K242852 ↗ALM Tube I.D. 6.0, O.D. 8.2 (520843), ALM Tube I.D. 7.0, O.D. 9.7 (520845), ALM Tube I.D. 7.5, O.D. 10.3 (520846), ALM Tube I.D. 8.0, O.D. 11.0 (520847)2024-09-20 → 2025-06-13266Traditional
K233001 ↗Bioscope Neuromonitor Device2023-09-22 → 2024-12-13448Traditional
K241917 ↗EARP Nerve Cuff Electrode2024-07-01 → 2024-07-3130Special

Use this comparison: select a record to investigate, read its actual indications and design, and document differences. A shared code or elapsed period cannot establish its relevance to your device.

Calendar elapsed days are not active FDA review time, a promised schedule or a success probability. The selection includes only the stated recorded decisions, not all applications. Latest records can postdate the named historical decision and are contextual research, not its predicates. Shared codes, summaries and observed records do not prove equivalence, current market availability, buyer applicability or predicate suitability.

Calculation, selection and source versions

Reuse the complete-endpoint exact-primary-code, documented SE-decision cohort and its stated cutoff/window. Retain its type-7 quartiles only when at least 20 valid date pairs are present. Independently subtract the named official record’s receipt date from its decision date; missing or negative pairs remain unknown. Show up to four latest exact-code research records, excluding the named ID. Parent analysis hash, source snapshots and calculation versions are retained.

Calculation: fda-named-decision-cohort-context-1; cutoff 2026-09-27; 0 parent records excluded; units record counts; calendar elapsed days.

Source snapshots: 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002.

Read beyond the decision row

Recorded evidence and differences to investigate

The summary is manufacturer-submitted context hosted by FDA. Negative/no-study statements are preserved. Evidence themes are not binding legal requirements.

Short opening excerpts identify the source sections. Read the linked original for the full study context, negative statements, tables and limitations. Public quotations are limited to 120 words per acquired summary; the internal evidence packet retains exact section ranges for review.

Indications and users

K251672 · PDF page 6 ↗ Source 2

The EMG Tube is indicated for use where continuous monitoring of the nerves supplying
the laryngeal musculature is required during surgical procedures.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

Design and operating principle

K251672 · PDF page 6 ↗ Source 2

The Medtronic NIM Essence™                    EMG Endotracheal Tube (ETT) is a flexible,    reinforced
PVC endotracheal tube with an inflatable cuff.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

Performance evidence actually described

K251672 · PDF page 9 ↗ Source 3

The following  non-                                                                 clinical testing was performed to demonstrate substantial equivalence
to the predicate device.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

Clinical evidence or its stated absence

K251672 · PDF page 10 ↗ Source 4

Not applicable -                                   No clinical study is deemed necessary since the substantial equivalence
has been sufficiently demonstrated by non-                                                                            clinical studies.

Compare with your product: Preserve whether the summary describes clinical evidence or says none was performed. This recorded case does not determine whether your product needs clinical evidence.

Extraction selection and limits

Select observed whole-line section headings or explicit colon-delimited inline labels on readable PDF pages, including the explicitly documented heading-spacing variants in this parser version. Preserve the original heading, character ranges and layout; do not repair excerpt text. Exclude letter boilerplate and uncertain pages. Stop at observed table headings; do not infer table columns or scalar results from layout text. Multi-column or suspicious split-numeric excerpts are excluded until reviewed alternate extraction is available. Original layout records remain retained; any alternate text has its own extractor-version locator and requires original-page review. For each dimension, prefer usable versioned alternate text where available, selecting its longest usable excerpt; otherwise select the longest usable original-layout excerpt. Ties preserve source order. Bounded to 64 PDF pages and 3,500 characters per section. This is a selection, not a complete dossier analysis.

Excluded extraction items: {'uncertain_pdf_page': 1}.

Known facts and deciding inputs

Known context: US. Confirm the organisation’s role, relevant activities and markets against the cited criteria.

Source factRecorded valueWhat to check
510(k) identifierK251672 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Generic device categoryNIM Essence™ EMG Endotracheal Tube (NIMEID060); NIM Essence™ EMG Endotracheal Tube (NIMEID065); NIM Essence™ EMG Endotracheal Tube (NIMEID070); NIM Essence™ EMG Endotracheal Tube (NIMEID075); NIM Essence™ EMG Endotracheal Tube (NIMEID080) [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded applicantMedtronic Xomed, Inc. [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
FDA product codeETN [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Decision date2026-02-10 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded decision codeSESE [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Submission typeTraditional [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Receipt date2025-05-30 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.

Prepare a differences and evidence worksheet

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

  1. Indications and users — what differs in our product?

    Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

    Useful evidence: Our proposed indication, user/population and use environment beside this exact recorded indication.

  2. Design and operating principle — what differs in our product?

    Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

    Useful evidence: Design description, materials/components, accessory list and a differences matrix.

  3. Performance evidence actually described — what differs in our product?

    The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

    Useful evidence: The cited narrative and full tables, underlying protocols/results and a reviewed comparison with the proposed product.

  4. Clinical evidence or its stated absence — what differs in our product?

    Preserve whether the summary describes clinical evidence or says none was performed. This recorded case does not determine whether your product needs clinical evidence.

    Useful evidence: Your proposed claims and supporting evidence, plus a reviewed rationale for clinical-evidence needs.

Work packages and dependencies

What needs to happen first

Questions for providers

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.

FDA openFDA — 510(k) decision records ↗

2026-10-05 · retrieved 2026-10-06

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D01 · snapshot 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002

  • [1] device-510k-0001-of-0001.json:results[91870] · record c4941903ae8cc4266918741a6348d1a6b3a9a543f8614b892e4c05c92095b79e
  • [5] Complete results array / fda-decision-context:K251672 · record whole dataset partition

FDA 510(k) summary — K251672 ↗

Tue, 10 Mar 2026 15:40:20 GMT · retrieved 2026-10-07

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot 5b725e514dbd3bce1a8403551f98be6d97090eac36bd3c5925c1cec81168df0e

  • [2] PDF page 6 · record 0076adfcb48a105db7eeea7a2bb064af8b69f296cb13acac832227138269c9c6
  • [3] PDF page 9 · record a52fae4a2ec51d231cadcbaee7ea576caf5b013056fb3d494402e02dec36345d
  • [4] PDF page 10 · record bc2599d83e20c8003693650a4c1beb8e525096c567e7c306d0b44f7dd53ad67e

Prepare an editable project brief

Confirm the facts, scope and contact preference before sharing your project. Preparing this page sends no provider outreach.

Choose work packages to discuss

Compare FDA 510(k) Submission Services

Packaging + Shelf-life + Distribution Testing