Recorded device evidence

Intraosseous Fusion Device System (K231649): indications, design and recorded evidence

The acquired K231649 file contains product-specific indications and users, design and operating principle, performance evidence actually described sections. Compare these dated manufacturer statements with your own indication and design before commissioning evidence work. They describe this submission; they do not prescribe your testing, validate performance independently or establish a suitable predicate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-08. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Computed exact-code research

This decision beside its recorded product-code cohort

The 2021–2025 complete-year cohort contains 108 selected decisions under primary code HWC. 108 have valid reported receipt/decision pairs; 0 pairs are missing or invalid.

Calendar elapsed days: lower quartile 59.0, median 103.5, upper quartile 190.2. These are recorded calendar differences, not active FDA review time.

The table shows the named decision and up to four latest exact-code research records through 2026-09-27. It can include partial-year records outside the complete-year cohort. The quartiles above use the full stated cohort, not this displayed selection.

Research recordRecorded deviceReceipt → decisionCalendar elapsed daysRecorded submission type
K231649 ↗ · this pageIntraosseous Fusion Device System2023-06-06 → 2023-09-29115Traditional
K262975 ↗Arthrex Beaming System2026-08-26 → 2026-09-2530Special
K260995 ↗DynaNail Helix® Fixation System2026-03-26 → 2026-09-23181Traditional
K254280 ↗F.A.S.T Screw2025-12-30 → 2026-09-21265Traditional
K261057 ↗ActivaScrew™ Cannulated COM2026-03-31 → 2026-09-04157Traditional

Use this comparison: select a record to investigate, read its actual indications and design, and document differences. A shared code or elapsed period cannot establish its relevance to your device.

Calendar elapsed days are not active FDA review time, a promised schedule or a success probability. The selection includes only the stated recorded decisions, not all applications. Latest records can postdate the named historical decision and are contextual research, not its predicates. Shared codes, summaries and observed records do not prove equivalence, current market availability, buyer applicability or predicate suitability.

Calculation, selection and source versions

Reuse the complete-endpoint exact-primary-code, documented SE-decision cohort and its stated cutoff/window. Retain its type-7 quartiles only when at least 20 valid date pairs are present. Independently subtract the named official record’s receipt date from its decision date; missing or negative pairs remain unknown. Show up to four latest exact-code research records, excluding the named ID. Parent analysis hash, source snapshots and calculation versions are retained.

Calculation: fda-named-decision-cohort-context-1; cutoff 2026-09-27; 82 parent records excluded; units record counts; calendar elapsed days.

Source snapshots: 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002.

Read beyond the decision row

Recorded evidence and differences to investigate

The summary is manufacturer-submitted context hosted by FDA. Negative/no-study statements are preserved. Evidence themes are not binding legal requirements.

Short opening excerpts identify the source sections. Read the linked original for the full study context, negative statements, tables and limitations. Public quotations are limited to 120 words per acquired summary; the internal evidence packet retains exact section ranges for review.

Indications and users

K231649 · PDF page 4 ↗ Source 2

Read this statement in the original PDF; no complete statement fits the short excerpt.

Compare with your product: Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

Design and operating principle

K231649 · PDF page 4 ↗ Source 2

The Intraosseous Fusion Device          (IFD) is a threaded titanium implant that is designed to provide
stabilization of bones, bone segments or bone fragments to facilitate arthrodesis.  The implant has an
interrupted external thread to facilit     ate placement and fixation.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

Performance evidence actually described

K231649 · PDF page 9 ↗ Source 3

•    Mechanical testing (torsional strength, driving torque, axial pullout strength) was carried out
         per ASTM F543 on the subject device and additional predicate, OrthoSolutions System26
         bone screws.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

Extraction selection and limits

Select observed whole-line section headings or explicit colon-delimited inline labels on readable PDF pages, including the explicitly documented heading-spacing variants in this parser version. Preserve the original heading, character ranges and layout; do not repair excerpt text. Exclude letter boilerplate and uncertain pages. Stop at observed table headings; do not infer table columns or scalar results from layout text. Multi-column or suspicious split-numeric excerpts are excluded until reviewed alternate extraction is available. Original layout records remain retained; any alternate text has its own extractor-version locator and requires original-page review. For each dimension, prefer usable versioned alternate text where available, selecting its longest usable excerpt; otherwise select the longest usable original-layout excerpt. Ties preserve source order. Bounded to 64 PDF pages and 3,500 characters per section. This is a selection, not a complete dossier analysis.

Excluded extraction items: {}.

Historical references beside dated FDA recognition metadata

Read each mention in the linked original summary, including statements that testing was not performed. Recognition metadata does not determine your testing needs, chosen edition or transition eligibility.

Reference in this historical summaryDesignation in the acquired FDA exportRecognition / entry dateRecorded transition-expiration dateSources
ISO 17665-1
PERFORMANCE DATA
ISO 17665-1 First edition 2006-08-15
Sterilization of health care products - Moist heat - Part 1: Requirements for the development validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices
14-333 · Complete
04/04/2016
07/04/2027Summary [3] · Metadata [4]
Read scope and recognition limits ↗
ISO 17665-1
PERFORMANCE DATA
ANSI AAMI ISO 17665-1:2006/(R)2013
Sterilization of health care products -- Moist heat -- Part 1: Requirements for the development validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices
14-333 · Complete
04/04/2016
07/04/2027Summary [3] · Metadata [5]
Read scope and recognition limits ↗
ISO 14937
PERFORMANCE DATA
ISO 14937 Second edition 2009-10-15
Sterilization of health care products - General requirements for characterization of a sterilizing agent and the development validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices
14-337 · Complete
04/04/2016
Not recorded in this export rowSummary [3] · Metadata [6]
Read scope and recognition limits ↗
ISO 14937
PERFORMANCE DATA
ANSI AAMI ISO 14937:2009/(R)2013
Sterilization of health care products - General requirements for characterization of a sterilizing agent and the development validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices
14-337 · Complete
04/04/2016
Not recorded in this export rowSummary [3] · Metadata [7]
Read scope and recognition limits ↗

Prepare for your provider: the proposed protocol/report edition, its justification for your device and the complete current FDA recognition sheet. In particular, inspect exclusions for partial recognition. An edition difference does not automatically make the historical evidence unusable.

Identifier-matching method and selection limits

Match explicit ISO/IEC identifiers in selected preserved summary excerpts to the acquired, count-reconciled FDA metadata export. Preserve the historical edition mention, current snapshot designations, entry dates, recognition extent and any recorded transition-expiration date as separate facts. No title-similarity, edition-equivalence, test-mandate or transition-eligibility inference. At most twenty matched occurrences and thirty metadata rows per reference; wide matches are held for separate review.

2 of 2 matched reference occurrences shown.

Known facts and deciding inputs

Known context: US. Confirm the organisation’s role, relevant activities and markets against the cited criteria.

Source factRecorded valueWhat to check
510(k) identifierK231649 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Generic device categoryIntraosseous Fusion Device System [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded applicantAuxano Medical, LLC [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
FDA product codeHWC [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Decision date2023-09-29 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded decision codeSESE [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Submission typeTraditional [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Receipt date2023-06-06 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.

Prepare a differences and evidence worksheet

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

  1. Indications and users — what differs in our product?

    Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

    Useful evidence: Our proposed indication, user/population and use environment beside this exact recorded indication.

  2. Design and operating principle — what differs in our product?

    Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

    Useful evidence: Design description, materials/components, accessory list and a differences matrix.

  3. Performance evidence actually described — what differs in our product?

    The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

    Useful evidence: The cited narrative and full tables, underlying protocols/results and a reviewed comparison with the proposed product.

  4. Which edition and recognition limits would our provider rely on?

    Compare each historical reference below with the dated FDA metadata. Ask the specialist to justify the applicable scope and selected edition, read the complete supplementary sheet for partial-recognition exclusions, and investigate any recorded transition conditions. A difference in editions does not automatically make the earlier study unusable.

    Useful evidence: Proposed protocol/report edition, dated FDA recognition sheet with scope/exclusions, and a documented edition/transition rationale for the actual device.

Work packages and dependencies

What needs to happen first

Questions for providers

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.

FDA openFDA — 510(k) decision records ↗

2026-10-05 · retrieved 2026-10-06

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D01 · snapshot 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002

  • [1] device-510k-0001-of-0001.json:results[167447] · record b1207ef6b03df3d217fbfaf63fa028b892b9d71c073353bf50a193f6014f65dc
  • [8] Complete results array / fda-decision-context:K231649 · record whole dataset partition

FDA 510(k) summary — K231649 ↗

Sat, 30 Sep 2023 22:13:34 GMT · retrieved 2026-10-08

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot 7ee99792491a608fdf8fb8c683dd8c7c9748e23d12e464b5d8bb50808d8d124e

  • [2] PDF page 4 · record cc2ad280739b5e34472384a7ec7843cf4df1c398d22a375a9ab6e8211dbf0a85
  • [3] PDF page 9 · record 1406e147d5e6caf87147df084fc15c9bbdb00f769410b55effc967e6f5ba77ac

FDA — recognition metadata exported through the official search form ↗

Version not stated by the source · retrieved 2026-10-07

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot 94ccf56dc846c7f6d78d6ad77dc6e87d1803ac3612af01d6894949e34c4a78d8

  • [4] CSV row 1553 · record c943a58f778e360c32eefb9f7d93897411ab81b9d9ebcd861ee555120bd72bcc
  • [5] CSV row 1554 · record b09711418b3642a47901d0139325c1f32564bc5a98dab6819be283a8696110f1
  • [6] CSV row 1555 · record 1e90f85e62fed6cf49ed830e4742f6bdbb84256e4f9402e4f21af6fadbc0c7b3
  • [7] CSV row 1556 · record 3158ef7bcf1123962fdedf3181d2e0a01f707f196d5507b1e12776ed0054ba44

Prepare an editable project brief

Confirm the facts, scope and contact preference before sharing your project. Preparing this page sends no provider outreach.

Choose work packages to discuss

Compare FDA 510(k) Submission Services

Sterilization + Microbiology Validation