The acquired K230320 file contains product-specific indications and users, design and operating principle, performance evidence actually described, clinical evidence or its stated absence sections. Compare these dated manufacturer statements with your own indication and design before commissioning evidence work. They describe this submission; they do not prescribe your testing, validate performance independently or establish a suitable predicate.
Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.
Computed exact-code research
This decision beside its recorded product-code cohort
The 2021–2025 complete-year cohort contains 11 selected decisions under primary code ETN. 11 have valid reported receipt/decision pairs; 0 pairs are missing or invalid.
No quartiles are displayed: this complete-year cohort has fewer than 20 valid pairs.
The table shows the named decision and up to four latest exact-code research records through 2026-09-27. It can include partial-year records outside the complete-year cohort. The quartiles above use the full stated cohort, not this displayed selection.
| Research record | Recorded device | Receipt → decision | Calendar elapsed days | Recorded submission type |
|---|
| K230320 ↗ · this page | NIM Standard Reinforced EMG Endotracheal Tube; CONTACT Reinforced EMG Endotracheal Tube | 2023-02-06 → 2023-10-26 | 262 | Special |
|---|
| K253536 ↗ | Evala Nerve Stimulator (EPNR002) | 2025-11-13 → 2026-02-27 | 106 | Traditional |
|---|
| K251672 ↗ | NIM Essence EMG Endotracheal Tube (NIMEID060); NIM Essence EMG Endotracheal Tube (NIMEID065); NIM Essence EMG Endotracheal Tube (NIMEID070); NIM Essence EMG Endotracheal Tube (NIMEID075); NIM Essence EMG Endotracheal Tube (NIMEID080) | 2025-05-30 → 2026-02-10 | 256 | Traditional |
|---|
| K242852 ↗ | ALM Tube I.D. 6.0, O.D. 8.2 (520843), ALM Tube I.D. 7.0, O.D. 9.7 (520845), ALM Tube I.D. 7.5, O.D. 10.3 (520846), ALM Tube I.D. 8.0, O.D. 11.0 (520847) | 2024-09-20 → 2025-06-13 | 266 | Traditional |
|---|
| K233001 ↗ | Bioscope Neuromonitor Device | 2023-09-22 → 2024-12-13 | 448 | Traditional |
|---|
Use this comparison: select a record to investigate, read its actual indications and design, and document differences. A shared code or elapsed period cannot establish its relevance to your device.
Calendar elapsed days are not active FDA review time, a promised schedule or a success probability. The selection includes only the stated recorded decisions, not all applications. Latest records can postdate the named historical decision and are contextual research, not its predicates. Shared codes, summaries and observed records do not prove equivalence, current market availability, buyer applicability or predicate suitability.
Calculation, selection and source versions
Reuse the complete-endpoint exact-primary-code, documented SE-decision cohort and its stated cutoff/window. Retain its type-7 quartiles only when at least 20 valid date pairs are present. Independently subtract the named official record’s receipt date from its decision date; missing or negative pairs remain unknown. Show up to four latest exact-code research records, excluding the named ID. Parent analysis hash, source snapshots and calculation versions are retained.
Calculation: fda-named-decision-cohort-context-1; cutoff 2026-09-27; 0 parent records excluded; units record counts; calendar elapsed days.
Source snapshots: 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002.
Read beyond the decision row
Recorded evidence and differences to investigate
The summary is manufacturer-submitted context hosted by FDA. Negative/no-study statements are preserved. Evidence themes are not binding legal requirements.
Short opening excerpts identify the source sections. Read the linked original for the full study context, negative statements, tables and limitations. Public quotations are limited to 120 words per acquired summary; the internal evidence packet retains exact section ranges for review.
Indications and users
K230320 · PDF page 3 ↗ Source 2
The EMG tube is indicated for use where continuous monitoring of the nerves supplying the laryngeal musculature is
required during surgical procedures.
The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.
Compare with your product: Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.
Design and operating principle
K230320 · PDF page 5 ↗ Source 3
Medtronic Xomed, Inc.’s NIM ™ Standard Reinforced and NIM CONTACT ™ Reinforced Endotracheal
Tubes are flexible, reinforced endotracheal tubes with inflatable cuffs.
The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.
Compare with your product: Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.
Performance evidence actually described
K230320 · PDF page 7 ↗ Source 4
Performance Testing Discussion
The following nonclinical testing was performed to establish substantial equivalence to the
predicates: Summative Usability Validation and Labeling Design Validation.
The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.
Compare with your product: The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.
Clinical evidence or its stated absence
K230320 · PDF page 7 ↗ Source 4
No clinical test data is required of the proposed device.
Compare with your product: Preserve whether the summary describes clinical evidence or says none was performed. This recorded case does not determine whether your product needs clinical evidence.
Extraction selection and limits
Select observed whole-line section headings or explicit colon-delimited inline labels on readable PDF pages, including the explicitly documented heading-spacing variants in this parser version. Preserve the original heading, character ranges and layout; do not repair excerpt text. Exclude letter boilerplate and uncertain pages. Stop at observed table headings; do not infer table columns or scalar results from layout text. Multi-column or suspicious split-numeric excerpts are excluded until reviewed alternate extraction is available. Original layout records remain retained; any alternate text has its own extractor-version locator and requires original-page review. For each dimension, prefer usable versioned alternate text where available, selecting its longest usable excerpt; otherwise select the longest usable original-layout excerpt. Ties preserve source order. Bounded to 64 PDF pages and 3,500 characters per section. This is a selection, not a complete dossier analysis.
Excluded extraction items: {}.
