Recorded device evidence

Smart double sides wearable breast pump, Electric bilateral breast pump (K230102): indications, design and recorded evidence

The acquired K230102 file contains product-specific indications and users, design and operating principle, recorded comparison and differences, performance evidence actually described sections. Compare these dated manufacturer statements with your own indication and design before commissioning evidence work. They describe this submission; they do not prescribe your testing, validate performance independently or establish a suitable predicate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-08. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Computed exact-code research

This decision beside its recorded product-code cohort

The 2021–2025 complete-year cohort contains 87 selected decisions under primary code HGX. 87 have valid reported receipt/decision pairs; 0 pairs are missing or invalid.

Calendar elapsed days: lower quartile 114.5, median 154.0, upper quartile 222.0. These are recorded calendar differences, not active FDA review time.

The table shows the named decision and up to four latest exact-code research records through 2026-09-27. It can include partial-year records outside the complete-year cohort. The quartiles above use the full stated cohort, not this displayed selection.

Research recordRecorded deviceReceipt → decisionCalendar elapsed daysRecorded submission type
K230102 ↗ · this pageSmart double sides wearable breast pump, Electric bilateral breast pump2023-01-13 → 2023-09-21251Traditional
K254203 ↗Wearable Breast Pump (Model S36)2025-12-29 → 2026-09-17262Traditional
K261622 ↗Philips Avent Natural Care Hands-free Wearable Electric Breast Pump (Model: SCF593/52, SCF593/62); Philips Avent Natural Care Warming Hands-free Wearable Electric Breast Pump (Model: SCF594/52, SCF594/62)2026-05-15 → 2026-09-03111Traditional
K262774 ↗Wearable breast pump (Model: XN/MD-2249BS, ZFHF)2026-08-04 → 2026-09-0128Traditional
K260643 ↗Cimilre Dual Max2026-02-27 → 2026-08-21175Traditional

Use this comparison: select a record to investigate, read its actual indications and design, and document differences. A shared code or elapsed period cannot establish its relevance to your device.

Calendar elapsed days are not active FDA review time, a promised schedule or a success probability. The selection includes only the stated recorded decisions, not all applications. Latest records can postdate the named historical decision and are contextual research, not its predicates. Shared codes, summaries and observed records do not prove equivalence, current market availability, buyer applicability or predicate suitability.

Calculation, selection and source versions

Reuse the complete-endpoint exact-primary-code, documented SE-decision cohort and its stated cutoff/window. Retain its type-7 quartiles only when at least 20 valid date pairs are present. Independently subtract the named official record’s receipt date from its decision date; missing or negative pairs remain unknown. Show up to four latest exact-code research records, excluding the named ID. Parent analysis hash, source snapshots and calculation versions are retained.

Calculation: fda-named-decision-cohort-context-1; cutoff 2026-09-27; 0 parent records excluded; units record counts; calendar elapsed days.

Source snapshots: 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002.

Read beyond the decision row

Recorded evidence and differences to investigate

The summary is manufacturer-submitted context hosted by FDA. Negative/no-study statements are preserved. Evidence themes are not binding legal requirements.

Short opening excerpts identify the source sections. Read the linked original for the full study context, negative statements, tables and limitations. Public quotations are limited to 120 words per acquired summary; the internal evidence packet retains exact section ranges for review.

Indications and users

K230102 · PDF page 3 ↗ Source 2

Wearable Breast Pump is a powered breast pump to be used by lactating women to express and collect milk from their
breasts. The device is intended for a single user.

Compare with your product: Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

Design and operating principle

K230102 · PDF page 4 ↗ Source 3

The Wearable Breast Pump is an electrically powered, software controlled, digital, single
user, wearable                      breast pump                      for lactating women to express and collect milk from the
breast.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

Recorded comparison and differences

K230102 · PDF page 5 ↗ Source 4

Predicate
    Item                                                      Subject Device                                                          Device                                                              Comparison
                                                                                                                                      (K212180)

   Product name                                                                                                                            Wearable Breast Wearable Breast
                                                              Pump (ABP-1508)                                                         Pump (Model S12)                                                                                                                                    N/A

   Product code                                                                                                                                                                                   HGX                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          HGX                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      same
   Regulation No.                                             21 CFR 884.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: The summary’s comparison is a manufacturer statement about that submission. Investigate the actual design differences and cited records before considering any comparator or predicate.

Performance evidence actually described

K230102 · PDF page 8 ↗ Source 5

Other performance testing was conducted to show that the device meets its design
requirements and performs as intended.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

Extraction selection and limits

Select observed whole-line section headings or explicit colon-delimited inline labels on readable PDF pages, including the explicitly documented heading-spacing variants in this parser version. Preserve the original heading, character ranges and layout; do not repair excerpt text. Exclude letter boilerplate and uncertain pages. Stop at observed table headings; do not infer table columns or scalar results from layout text. Multi-column or suspicious split-numeric excerpts are excluded until reviewed alternate extraction is available. Original layout records remain retained; any alternate text has its own extractor-version locator and requires original-page review. For each dimension, prefer usable versioned alternate text where available, selecting its longest usable excerpt; otherwise select the longest usable original-layout excerpt. Ties preserve source order. Bounded to 64 PDF pages and 3,500 characters per section. This is a selection, not a complete dossier analysis.

Excluded extraction items: {}.

Known facts and deciding inputs

Known context: US. Confirm the organisation’s role, relevant activities and markets against the cited criteria.

Source factRecorded valueWhat to check
510(k) identifierK230102 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Generic device categorySmart double sides wearable breast pump, Electric bilateral breast pump [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded applicantHuizhou Lvb Maternal and Infant Supplies Co., Ltd. [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
FDA product codeHGX [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Decision date2023-09-21 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded decision codeSESE [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Submission typeTraditional [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Receipt date2023-01-13 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.

Prepare a differences and evidence worksheet

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

  1. Indications and users — what differs in our product?

    Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

    Useful evidence: Our proposed indication, user/population and use environment beside this exact recorded indication.

  2. Design and operating principle — what differs in our product?

    Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

    Useful evidence: Design description, materials/components, accessory list and a differences matrix.

  3. Recorded comparison and differences — what differs in our product?

    The summary’s comparison is a manufacturer statement about that submission. Investigate the actual design differences and cited records before considering any comparator or predicate.

    Useful evidence: Feature-by-feature differences and the underlying cited documents; no automated predicate selection.

  4. Performance evidence actually described — what differs in our product?

    The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

    Useful evidence: The cited narrative and full tables, underlying protocols/results and a reviewed comparison with the proposed product.

Work packages and dependencies

Questions for providers

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.

FDA openFDA — 510(k) decision records ↗

2026-10-05 · retrieved 2026-10-06

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D01 · snapshot 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002

  • [1] device-510k-0001-of-0001.json:results[30298] · record 0cbc9c5448c0f8f9b01f719e4870de58d6ededb3fdb55f0291a1ccfb236e9059
  • [6] Complete results array / fda-decision-context:K230102 · record whole dataset partition

FDA 510(k) summary — K230102 ↗

Fri, 22 Sep 2023 20:35:34 GMT · retrieved 2026-10-08

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot afe0cbb7f2ff236beeb76f46d1483c591f5af6246db2c30efabef0260cda4944

  • [2] PDF page 3 · record 6a8746d916e4d2e4e8713aa94e3d263ecbde15cadde1de3a004959730bc16f84
  • [3] PDF page 4 · record ea6ee68dd8b57256930b10a77eac518ae0e7a2ae99a0b15ba83e038cd26e1f95
  • [4] PDF page 5 · record fa9923ff2aa334032ff837a0f22d7b74eec9f63959e2b0164f5deb9ef6040cc3
  • [5] PDF page 8 · record b7852580cd8e03156601562c3cd5a7e8331e50eb80fdbd49e3230dbee8f87814

Prepare an editable project brief

Confirm the facts, scope and contact preference before sharing your project. Preparing this page sends no provider outreach.

Choose work packages to discuss

Compare FDA 510(k) Submission Services