Recorded device evidence

Okti (K230073): indications, design and recorded evidence

The acquired K230073 file contains product-specific indications and users, design and operating principle, performance evidence actually described sections. Compare these dated manufacturer statements with your own indication and design before commissioning evidence work. They describe this submission; they do not prescribe your testing, validate performance independently or establish a suitable predicate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Computed exact-code research

This decision beside its recorded product-code cohort

The 2021–2025 complete-year cohort contains 10 selected decisions under primary code GWQ. 10 have valid reported receipt/decision pairs; 0 pairs are missing or invalid.

No quartiles are displayed: this complete-year cohort has fewer than 20 valid pairs.

The table shows the named decision and up to four latest exact-code research records through 2026-09-27. It can include partial-year records outside the complete-year cohort. The quartiles above use the full stated cohort, not this displayed selection.

Research recordRecorded deviceReceipt → decisionCalendar elapsed daysRecorded submission type
K230073 ↗ · this pageOkti2023-01-10 → 2023-02-0930Traditional
K261604 ↗Enobio Dx (Enobio Dx 8);Enobio Dx (Enobio Dx 20);Enobio Dx (Enobio Dx 32)2026-05-14 → 2026-06-1330Special
K260455 ↗New Wave System2026-02-11 → 2026-03-1330Special
K233403 ↗Flexset System2023-10-04 → 2024-04-30209Traditional
K231366 ↗Neuronaute Plus2023-05-11 → 2023-11-09182Traditional

Use this comparison: select a record to investigate, read its actual indications and design, and document differences. A shared code or elapsed period cannot establish its relevance to your device.

Calendar elapsed days are not active FDA review time, a promised schedule or a success probability. The selection includes only the stated recorded decisions, not all applications. Latest records can postdate the named historical decision and are contextual research, not its predicates. Shared codes, summaries and observed records do not prove equivalence, current market availability, buyer applicability or predicate suitability.

Calculation, selection and source versions

Reuse the complete-endpoint exact-primary-code, documented SE-decision cohort and its stated cutoff/window. Retain its type-7 quartiles only when at least 20 valid date pairs are present. Independently subtract the named official record’s receipt date from its decision date; missing or negative pairs remain unknown. Show up to four latest exact-code research records, excluding the named ID. Parent analysis hash, source snapshots and calculation versions are retained.

Calculation: fda-named-decision-cohort-context-1; cutoff 2026-09-27; 0 parent records excluded; units record counts; calendar elapsed days.

Source snapshots: 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002.

Read beyond the decision row

Recorded evidence and differences to investigate

The summary is manufacturer-submitted context hosted by FDA. Negative/no-study statements are preserved. Evidence themes are not binding legal requirements.

Short opening excerpts identify the source sections. Read the linked original for the full study context, negative statements, tables and limitations. Public quotations are limited to 120 words per acquired summary; the internal evidence packet retains exact section ranges for review.

Indications and users

K230073 · PDF page 3 ↗ Source 2

The Okti System is intended for use in the recording, displaying, analysis, printing and storage of human biological
parameters such as heart and muscle activity, eye movement, breathing and body movements to assist in the diagnosis of
various neurological disorders.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

Design and operating principle

K230073 · PDF page 5 ↗ Source 3

The Okti is a physiological data acquisition device intended for conducting EEG studies. It is used in
conjunction with a PC running Compumedics Profusion EEG software.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

Performance evidence actually described

K230073 · PDF page 7 ↗ Source 4

An extensive collection of tests have been conducted and successfully completed including,

     •    Electrical Safety Testing as per IEC 60601-1:2005. These ensure there is no potential for
          detrimental effects on patients, other persons, animals or the surroundings.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

Extraction selection and limits

Select observed whole-line section headings or explicit colon-delimited inline labels on readable PDF pages, including the explicitly documented heading-spacing variants in this parser version. Preserve the original heading, character ranges and layout; do not repair excerpt text. Exclude letter boilerplate and uncertain pages. Stop at observed table headings; do not infer table columns or scalar results from layout text. Multi-column or suspicious split-numeric excerpts are excluded until reviewed alternate extraction is available. Original layout records remain retained; any alternate text has its own extractor-version locator and requires original-page review. For each dimension, prefer usable versioned alternate text where available, selecting its longest usable excerpt; otherwise select the longest usable original-layout excerpt. Ties preserve source order. Bounded to 64 PDF pages and 3,500 characters per section. This is a selection, not a complete dossier analysis.

Excluded extraction items: {}.

Historical references beside dated FDA recognition metadata

Read each mention in the linked original summary, including statements that testing was not performed. Recognition metadata does not determine your testing needs, chosen edition or transition eligibility.

Reference in this historical summaryDesignation in the acquired FDA exportRecognition / entry dateRecorded transition-expiration dateSources
IEC 60601-1:2005
Summary of Performance Data
IEC 60601-1 Edition 3.2 2020-08 CONSOLIDATED VERSION
Medical electrical equipment - Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Note: This standard is recognized with relevant US national differences applied see references #1 and #2 in the Relevant FDA Guidance and/or Supportive Publication section below.
19-49 · Complete
04/03/2023
Not recorded in this export rowSummary [4] · Metadata [5]
Read scope and recognition limits ↗
IEC 60601-1-2
Summary of Performance Data
IEC 60601-1-2 Edition 4.1 2020-09 CONSOLIDATED VERSION
Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic disturbances - Requirements and tests
19-36 · Partial
12/21/2020
Not recorded in this export rowSummary [4] · Metadata [6]
Read scope and recognition limits ↗
IEC 60601-1-2
Summary of Performance Data
ANSI AAMI IEC 60601-1-2:2014 [Including AMD 1:2021]
Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic disturbances - Requirements and tests [Including Amendment 1 (2021)]
19-36 · Partial
12/21/2020
Not recorded in this export rowSummary [4] · Metadata [7]
Read scope and recognition limits ↗
IEC 80601-2-26
Summary of Performance Data
IEC 80601-2-26 First Edition 2024-03 CONSOLIDATED VERSION
Medical electrical equipment -- Part 2-26: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of electroencephalographs
17-23 · Partial
05/25/2026
Not recorded in this export rowSummary [4] · Metadata [8]
Read scope and recognition limits ↗

Prepare for your provider: the proposed protocol/report edition, its justification for your device and the complete current FDA recognition sheet. In particular, inspect exclusions for partial recognition. An edition difference does not automatically make the historical evidence unusable.

Identifier-matching method and selection limits

Match explicit ISO/IEC identifiers in selected preserved summary excerpts to the acquired, count-reconciled FDA metadata export. Preserve the historical edition mention, current snapshot designations, entry dates, recognition extent and any recorded transition-expiration date as separate facts. No title-similarity, edition-equivalence, test-mandate or transition-eligibility inference. At most twenty matched occurrences and thirty metadata rows per reference; wide matches are held for separate review.

3 of 3 matched reference occurrences shown.

Known facts and deciding inputs

Known context: US. Confirm the organisation’s role, relevant activities and markets against the cited criteria.

Source factRecorded valueWhat to check
510(k) identifierK230073 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Generic device categoryOkti [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded applicantCompumedics Limited [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
FDA product codeGWQ [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Decision date2023-02-09 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded decision codeSESE [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Submission typeTraditional [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Receipt date2023-01-10 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.

Prepare a differences and evidence worksheet

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

  1. Indications and users — what differs in our product?

    Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

    Useful evidence: Our proposed indication, user/population and use environment beside this exact recorded indication.

  2. Design and operating principle — what differs in our product?

    Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

    Useful evidence: Design description, materials/components, accessory list and a differences matrix.

  3. Performance evidence actually described — what differs in our product?

    The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

    Useful evidence: The cited narrative and full tables, underlying protocols/results and a reviewed comparison with the proposed product.

  4. Which edition and recognition limits would our provider rely on?

    Compare each historical reference below with the dated FDA metadata. Ask the specialist to justify the applicable scope and selected edition, read the complete supplementary sheet for partial-recognition exclusions, and investigate any recorded transition conditions. A difference in editions does not automatically make the earlier study unusable.

    Useful evidence: Proposed protocol/report edition, dated FDA recognition sheet with scope/exclusions, and a documented edition/transition rationale for the actual device.

Work packages and dependencies

What needs to happen first

Questions for providers

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.

FDA openFDA — 510(k) decision records ↗

2026-10-05 · retrieved 2026-10-06

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D01 · snapshot 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002

  • [1] device-510k-0001-of-0001.json:results[89731] · record 9cfbff1ac739577538f11366c40e8091749940901422a5f8c67815c55a7c56db
  • [9] Complete results array / fda-decision-context:K230073 · record whole dataset partition

FDA 510(k) summary — K230073 ↗

Fri, 10 Feb 2023 23:14:02 GMT · retrieved 2026-10-07

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot 5a3f5fc45bb66f942cb961beef5d32da2f233bbc06150d0b1b735e2c126acdfc

  • [2] PDF page 3 · record 77666a2b4d0ab42a7af79653290aa8f47281a0be7ef50d478a60b5d5ed8dcb8b
  • [3] PDF page 5 · record 084df1f74157fca399aefdaedcc77f161fbf35009f4e883167fb9a6f7a55c9c9
  • [4] PDF page 7 · record 923e420e9645f72761b5acc41ba42fc7e76c3f60b730c690ea6847b408a7d533

FDA — recognition metadata exported through the official search form ↗

Version not stated by the source · retrieved 2026-10-07

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot 94ccf56dc846c7f6d78d6ad77dc6e87d1803ac3612af01d6894949e34c4a78d8

  • [5] CSV row 578 · record a8ca2ae93456e86990f02a41106f678908bb91d9543453fd2875c48c4cd817d0
  • [6] CSV row 876 · record a8f2c7aa5fa6c6ffe1d66d56377f30d7cbd9cdbc2078a3d67e8fdff024e2f0ca
  • [7] CSV row 877 · record 44ad0bacea9459dd513264be920199f91b017f973622203ca12b585f5bc35330
  • [8] CSV row 58 · record b56b8831ce1dbdad423275614703e626202fa2b1336de7257682517411315322

Prepare an editable project brief

Confirm the facts, scope and contact preference before sharing your project. Preparing this page sends no provider outreach.

Choose work packages to discuss

Compare FDA 510(k) Submission Services

Electrical Safety + EMC Testing (IEC 60601)