Recorded device evidence

ACL TOP 970 CL, HemosIL CL Anti-Cardiolipin IgM, HemosIL CL Anti-ß2 Glycoprotein-I IgM (K221359): indications, design and recorded evidence

The acquired K221359 file contains product-specific indications and users, design and operating principle, performance evidence actually described sections. Compare these dated manufacturer statements with your own indication and design before commissioning evidence work. They describe this submission; they do not prescribe your testing, validate performance independently or establish a suitable predicate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Computed exact-code research

This decision beside its recorded product-code cohort

The 2021–2025 complete-year cohort contains 9 selected decisions under primary code JPA. 9 have valid reported receipt/decision pairs; 0 pairs are missing or invalid.

No quartiles are displayed: this complete-year cohort has fewer than 20 valid pairs.

The table shows the named decision and up to four latest exact-code research records through 2026-09-27. It can include partial-year records outside the complete-year cohort. The quartiles above use the full stated cohort, not this displayed selection.

Research recordRecorded deviceReceipt → decisionCalendar elapsed daysRecorded submission type
K221359 ↗ · this pageACL TOP 970 CL, HemosIL CL Anti-Cardiolipin IgM, HemosIL CL Anti-ß2 Glycoprotein-I IgM2022-05-11 → 2023-09-29506Traditional
K253658 ↗STA Satellite Max®2025-11-20 → 2026-04-27158Traditional
K250965 ↗Automated Blood Coagulation Analyzer CN-Series (CN-6000)2025-03-31 → 2025-06-0263Traditional
K251024 ↗TEG 6s Hemostasis System Citrated: K, KH, RT, FF Assay Cartridge2025-04-02 → 2025-04-3028Special
K243858 ↗TEG 6s Hemostasis System Citrated: K, KH, RT, FF Assay Cartridge2024-12-16 → 2025-01-1530Special

Use this comparison: select a record to investigate, read its actual indications and design, and document differences. A shared code or elapsed period cannot establish its relevance to your device.

Calendar elapsed days are not active FDA review time, a promised schedule or a success probability. The selection includes only the stated recorded decisions, not all applications. Latest records can postdate the named historical decision and are contextual research, not its predicates. Shared codes, summaries and observed records do not prove equivalence, current market availability, buyer applicability or predicate suitability.

Calculation, selection and source versions

Reuse the complete-endpoint exact-primary-code, documented SE-decision cohort and its stated cutoff/window. Retain its type-7 quartiles only when at least 20 valid date pairs are present. Independently subtract the named official record’s receipt date from its decision date; missing or negative pairs remain unknown. Show up to four latest exact-code research records, excluding the named ID. Parent analysis hash, source snapshots and calculation versions are retained.

Calculation: fda-named-decision-cohort-context-1; cutoff 2026-09-27; 0 parent records excluded; units record counts; calendar elapsed days.

Source snapshots: 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002.

Read beyond the decision row

Recorded evidence and differences to investigate

The summary is manufacturer-submitted context hosted by FDA. Negative/no-study statements are preserved. Evidence themes are not binding legal requirements.

Short opening excerpts identify the source sections. Read the linked original for the full study context, negative statements, tables and limitations. Public quotations are limited to 120 words per acquired summary; the internal evidence packet retains exact section ranges for review.

Indications and users

K221359 · PDF page 7 ↗ Source 2

Instrument

                                                                                                      The ACL TOP 970 CL is a bench top, fully automated, random access analyzer
                                                                                                      designed specifically for in vitro diagnostic use by health care professionals in a
              ACL TOP 970 CL                                                                          clinical laboratory.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

Design and operating principle

K221359 · PDF page 6 ↗ Source 3

Instrument


                  ACL TOP 970 CL                                                                     The ACL TOP 970 CL is an instrument that integrates new chemiluminescent
                  Instrument                                                                         test capability similar to the ACL AcuStar, K083518.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

Performance evidence actually described

K221359 · PDF page 17 ↗ Source 4

New HemosIL CL Reagents (Cont.)
                                                                                                                                    Analytical Sensitivity
              Limit of detection (LoD) was assessed per CLSI EP17-A2 (2nd Edition) using three different lots of HemosIL CL
              Anti-Cardiolipin IgM and three different lots of HemosIL CL Anti-ß                         2 Glycoprotein-I  IgM reagent cartridges.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

Extraction selection and limits

Select observed whole-line section headings or explicit colon-delimited inline labels on readable PDF pages, including the explicitly documented heading-spacing variants in this parser version. Preserve the original heading, character ranges and layout; do not repair excerpt text. Exclude letter boilerplate and uncertain pages. Stop at observed table headings; do not infer table columns or scalar results from layout text. Multi-column or suspicious split-numeric excerpts are excluded until reviewed alternate extraction is available. Original layout records remain retained; any alternate text has its own extractor-version locator and requires original-page review. For each dimension, prefer usable versioned alternate text where available, selecting its longest usable excerpt; otherwise select the longest usable original-layout excerpt. Ties preserve source order. Bounded to 64 PDF pages and 3,500 characters per section. This is a selection, not a complete dossier analysis.

Excluded extraction items: {}.

Known facts and deciding inputs

Known context: US. Confirm the organisation’s role, relevant activities and markets against the cited criteria.

Source factRecorded valueWhat to check
510(k) identifierK221359 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Generic device categoryACL TOP 970 CL, HemosIL CL Anti-Cardiolipin IgM, HemosIL CL Anti-ß2 Glycoprotein-I IgM [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded applicantInstrumentation Laboratory CO [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
FDA product codeJPA [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Decision date2023-09-29 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded decision codeSESE [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Submission typeTraditional [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Receipt date2022-05-11 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.

Prepare a differences and evidence worksheet

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

  1. Indications and users — what differs in our product?

    Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

    Useful evidence: Our proposed indication, user/population and use environment beside this exact recorded indication.

  2. Design and operating principle — what differs in our product?

    Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

    Useful evidence: Design description, materials/components, accessory list and a differences matrix.

  3. Performance evidence actually described — what differs in our product?

    The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

    Useful evidence: The cited narrative and full tables, underlying protocols/results and a reviewed comparison with the proposed product.

Work packages and dependencies

Questions for providers

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.

FDA openFDA — 510(k) decision records ↗

2026-10-05 · retrieved 2026-10-06

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D01 · snapshot 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002

  • [1] device-510k-0001-of-0001.json:results[33466] · record badf7f84b40e4a9713ae2c5a3abdcd641d8d2dcb7dd71b8f07a3c58c64a1d524
  • [5] Complete results array / fda-decision-context:K221359 · record whole dataset partition

FDA 510(k) summary — K221359 ↗

Sat, 30 Sep 2023 16:00:04 GMT · retrieved 2026-10-07

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot b421d6f09b94d9ff5791948def71bafca0fc3916b4babcc0ab4b963dbd401cc1

  • [2] PDF page 7 · record 930e9be263ed5a6ec8ac4a46bfa3242aeee5f8dd314dfce4c633ca743839cb1d
  • [3] PDF page 6 · record 21bd1aff373a47fa4e6bf0bb6f576ccd16c21de071bc28689c63ae5edef912ba
  • [4] PDF page 17 · record a478b283a5362c8ff071b825ea1ce25782ca0327d7fbc8ab545efb44214011d5

Prepare an editable project brief

Confirm the facts, scope and contact preference before sharing your project. Preparing this page sends no provider outreach.

Choose work packages to discuss

Compare FDA 510(k) Submission Services