Recorded device evidence

NOVA RESIN dual cure, self adhesive resin cement (K213609): indications, design and recorded evidence

The acquired K213609 file contains product-specific indications and users, design and operating principle, performance evidence actually described sections. Compare these dated manufacturer statements with your own indication and design before commissioning evidence work. They describe this submission; they do not prescribe your testing, validate performance independently or establish a suitable predicate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Computed exact-code research

This decision beside its recorded product-code cohort

The 2021–2025 complete-year cohort contains 26 selected decisions under primary code EMA. 26 have valid reported receipt/decision pairs; 0 pairs are missing or invalid.

Calendar elapsed days: lower quartile 63.8, median 112.0, upper quartile 226.0. These are recorded calendar differences, not active FDA review time.

The table shows the named decision and up to four latest exact-code research records through 2026-09-27. It can include partial-year records outside the complete-year cohort. The quartiles above use the full stated cohort, not this displayed selection.

Research recordRecorded deviceReceipt → decisionCalendar elapsed daysRecorded submission type
K213609 ↗ · this pageNOVA RESIN dual cure, self adhesive resin cement2021-11-15 → 2022-08-09267Traditional
K262983 ↗EsTemp Implant2026-08-27 → 2026-09-2529Special
K254201 ↗Any-Cem2025-12-29 → 2026-08-13227Traditional
K261937 ↗PacTemp Automix NE2026-06-10 → 2026-08-0758Traditional
K261166 ↗DIA-CEM2026-04-09 → 2026-07-0991Traditional

Use this comparison: select a record to investigate, read its actual indications and design, and document differences. A shared code or elapsed period cannot establish its relevance to your device.

Calendar elapsed days are not active FDA review time, a promised schedule or a success probability. The selection includes only the stated recorded decisions, not all applications. Latest records can postdate the named historical decision and are contextual research, not its predicates. Shared codes, summaries and observed records do not prove equivalence, current market availability, buyer applicability or predicate suitability.

Calculation, selection and source versions

Reuse the complete-endpoint exact-primary-code, documented SE-decision cohort and its stated cutoff/window. Retain its type-7 quartiles only when at least 20 valid date pairs are present. Independently subtract the named official record’s receipt date from its decision date; missing or negative pairs remain unknown. Show up to four latest exact-code research records, excluding the named ID. Parent analysis hash, source snapshots and calculation versions are retained.

Calculation: fda-named-decision-cohort-context-1; cutoff 2026-09-27; 0 parent records excluded; units record counts; calendar elapsed days.

Source snapshots: 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002.

Read beyond the decision row

Recorded evidence and differences to investigate

The summary is manufacturer-submitted context hosted by FDA. Negative/no-study statements are preserved. Evidence themes are not binding legal requirements.

Short opening excerpts identify the source sections. Read the linked original for the full study context, negative statements, tables and limitations. Public quotations are limited to 120 words per acquired summary; the internal evidence packet retains exact section ranges for review.

Indications and users

K213609 · PDF page 5 ↗ Source 2

Read this statement in the original PDF; no complete statement fits the short excerpt.

Compare with your product: Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

Design and operating principle

K213609 · PDF page 5 ↗ Source 2

Resin Cement dual cure, self adhesive resin cement for the cementation of indirect restorations made
of high strength all ceramic, composite, metal-ceramic and metal.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

Performance evidence actually described

K213609 · PDF page 7 ↗ Source 3

In accordance with ISO 10993-1 (Biological Assessment Medical Devices-Part1: Evaluation and
Testing) standard, biocompatibility was evaluated for Nova Resin dual cure, self adhesive resin
cement. According to the test results, the device; is biocompatible.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

Extraction selection and limits

Select observed whole-line section headings or explicit colon-delimited inline labels on readable PDF pages, including the explicitly documented heading-spacing variants in this parser version. Preserve the original heading, character ranges and layout; do not repair excerpt text. Exclude letter boilerplate and uncertain pages. Stop at observed table headings; do not infer table columns or scalar results from layout text. Multi-column or suspicious split-numeric excerpts are excluded until reviewed alternate extraction is available. Original layout records remain retained; any alternate text has its own extractor-version locator and requires original-page review. For each dimension, prefer usable versioned alternate text where available, selecting its longest usable excerpt; otherwise select the longest usable original-layout excerpt. Ties preserve source order. Bounded to 64 PDF pages and 3,500 characters per section. This is a selection, not a complete dossier analysis.

Excluded extraction items: {'uncertain_pdf_page': 1}.

Historical references beside dated FDA recognition metadata

Read each mention in the linked original summary, including statements that testing was not performed. Recognition metadata does not determine your testing needs, chosen edition or transition eligibility.

Reference in this historical summaryDesignation in the acquired FDA exportRecognition / entry dateRecorded transition-expiration dateSources
ISO 10993-1
Biocompatibility Testing
ISO 10993-1 Fifth edition 2018-08
Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process
2-258 · Partial
01/14/2019
07/01/2029Summary [3] · Metadata [4]
Read scope and recognition limits ↗
ISO 10993-1
Biocompatibility Testing
ANSI AAMI ISO 10993-1: 2018
Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process
2-258 · Partial
01/14/2019
07/01/2029Summary [3] · Metadata [5]
Read scope and recognition limits ↗
ISO 10993-1
Biocompatibility Testing
ISO 10993-1 Sixth edition 2025-11
Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Requirements and general principles for the evaluation of biological safety within a risk management process
2-313 · Partial
05/25/2026
Not recorded in this export rowSummary [3] · Metadata [6]
Read scope and recognition limits ↗
ISO 4049:2019
Biocompatibility Testing
ISO 4049 Fifth edition 2019-05
Dentistry - Polymer-based restorative materials
4-298 · Complete
05/29/2023
Not recorded in this export rowSummary [3] · Metadata [7]
Read scope and recognition limits ↗

Prepare for your provider: the proposed protocol/report edition, its justification for your device and the complete current FDA recognition sheet. In particular, inspect exclusions for partial recognition. An edition difference does not automatically make the historical evidence unusable.

Identifier-matching method and selection limits

Match explicit ISO/IEC identifiers in selected preserved summary excerpts to the acquired, count-reconciled FDA metadata export. Preserve the historical edition mention, current snapshot designations, entry dates, recognition extent and any recorded transition-expiration date as separate facts. No title-similarity, edition-equivalence, test-mandate or transition-eligibility inference. At most twenty matched occurrences and thirty metadata rows per reference; wide matches are held for separate review.

2 of 2 matched reference occurrences shown.

Known facts and deciding inputs

Known context: US. Confirm the organisation’s role, relevant activities and markets against the cited criteria.

Source factRecorded valueWhat to check
510(k) identifierK213609 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Generic device categoryNOVA RESIN dual cure, self adhesive resin cement [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded applicantImicryl Dis Malzemeleri Sanayi VE Ticaret AS [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
FDA product codeEMA [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Decision date2022-08-09 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded decision codeSESE [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Submission typeTraditional [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Receipt date2021-11-15 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.

Prepare a differences and evidence worksheet

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

  1. Indications and users — what differs in our product?

    Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

    Useful evidence: Our proposed indication, user/population and use environment beside this exact recorded indication.

  2. Design and operating principle — what differs in our product?

    Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

    Useful evidence: Design description, materials/components, accessory list and a differences matrix.

  3. Performance evidence actually described — what differs in our product?

    The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

    Useful evidence: The cited narrative and full tables, underlying protocols/results and a reviewed comparison with the proposed product.

  4. Which edition and recognition limits would our provider rely on?

    Compare each historical reference below with the dated FDA metadata. Ask the specialist to justify the applicable scope and selected edition, read the complete supplementary sheet for partial-recognition exclusions, and investigate any recorded transition conditions. A difference in editions does not automatically make the earlier study unusable.

    Useful evidence: Proposed protocol/report edition, dated FDA recognition sheet with scope/exclusions, and a documented edition/transition rationale for the actual device.

Work packages and dependencies

What needs to happen first

Questions for providers

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.

FDA openFDA — 510(k) decision records ↗

2026-10-05 · retrieved 2026-10-06

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D01 · snapshot 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002

  • [1] device-510k-0001-of-0001.json:results[134361] · record 8227fbf213e7a3607309ef362b8f6eb7dc936e0ee35aef7eb189a911cff4a095
  • [8] Complete results array / fda-decision-context:K213609 · record whole dataset partition

FDA 510(k) summary — K213609 ↗

Wed, 10 Aug 2022 20:00:06 GMT · retrieved 2026-10-07

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot aea21b3ff51ee5de96e59b96396936bf60f9ff55850be3e3c4d5d36106f6dc9e

  • [2] PDF page 5 · record c975cfee9942b99a42b4380abe18a983421c8987c122c42c099bd0c50da480a4
  • [3] PDF page 7 · record 8b5790de1c8f030b0b1e1d3a83c5f0edcc5ef7434c1baf164215fd300addb424

FDA — recognition metadata exported through the official search form ↗

Version not stated by the source · retrieved 2026-10-07

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot 94ccf56dc846c7f6d78d6ad77dc6e87d1803ac3612af01d6894949e34c4a78d8

  • [4] CSV row 1151 · record eed6cb5e668a5447c86dfed62245d70e5e3e55d6cf3dcf6796391bc4509e3017
  • [5] CSV row 1152 · record 5837b9393097732ea2b59a36e37775bacda9307c0b8de0914383826ebde98568
  • [6] CSV row 4 · record 45cdd48d4d8693839e334ad8c7f9ef9546486f0676625819718db883dc2f6d46
  • [7] CSV row 516 · record 9c28496cf401e63aaae6d238f9aa49d0d98fcdd6aa216f0d5a7c7382dd46450b

Prepare an editable project brief

Confirm the facts, scope and contact preference before sharing your project. Preparing this page sends no provider outreach.

Choose work packages to discuss

Compare FDA 510(k) Submission Services

Biocompatibility Testing (ISO 10993 Program)