Recorded device evidence

Philips IntelliSite Pathology Solution (K203845): indications, design and recorded evidence

The acquired K203845 file contains product-specific indications and users, recorded comparison and differences, non-clinical evidence actually described sections. Compare these dated manufacturer statements with your own indication and design before commissioning evidence work. They describe this submission; they do not prescribe your testing, validate performance independently or establish a suitable predicate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Computed exact-code research

This decision beside its recorded product-code cohort

The 2021–2025 complete-year cohort contains 15 selected decisions under primary code PSY. 15 have valid reported receipt/decision pairs; 0 pairs are missing or invalid.

No quartiles are displayed: this complete-year cohort has fewer than 20 valid pairs.

The table shows the named decision and up to four latest exact-code research records through 2026-09-27. It can include partial-year records outside the complete-year cohort. The quartiles above use the full stated cohort, not this displayed selection.

Research recordRecorded deviceReceipt → decisionCalendar elapsed daysRecorded submission type
K203845 ↗ · this pagePhilips IntelliSite Pathology Solution2020-12-31 → 2021-09-17260Abbreviated
K253554 ↗Aperio GT 450 DX; Aperio GT 180 DX2025-11-14 → 2026-08-07266Traditional
K260964 ↗NanoZoomer S540MD Slide Scanner System2026-03-23 → 2026-07-22121Abbreviated
K251952 ↗Virasight2025-06-25 → 2026-07-17387Traditional
K253606 ↗NanoZoomer S20MD Slide scanner system; NanoZoomer S360MD Slide scanner system2025-11-18 → 2026-07-15239Abbreviated

Use this comparison: select a record to investigate, read its actual indications and design, and document differences. A shared code or elapsed period cannot establish its relevance to your device.

Calendar elapsed days are not active FDA review time, a promised schedule or a success probability. The selection includes only the stated recorded decisions, not all applications. Latest records can postdate the named historical decision and are contextual research, not its predicates. Shared codes, summaries and observed records do not prove equivalence, current market availability, buyer applicability or predicate suitability.

Calculation, selection and source versions

Reuse the complete-endpoint exact-primary-code, documented SE-decision cohort and its stated cutoff/window. Retain its type-7 quartiles only when at least 20 valid date pairs are present. Independently subtract the named official record’s receipt date from its decision date; missing or negative pairs remain unknown. Show up to four latest exact-code research records, excluding the named ID. Parent analysis hash, source snapshots and calculation versions are retained.

Calculation: fda-named-decision-cohort-context-1; cutoff 2026-09-27; 1 parent records excluded; units record counts; calendar elapsed days.

Source snapshots: 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002.

Read beyond the decision row

Recorded evidence and differences to investigate

The summary is manufacturer-submitted context hosted by FDA. Negative/no-study statements are preserved. Evidence themes are not binding legal requirements.

Short opening excerpts identify the source sections. Read the linked original for the full study context, negative statements, tables and limitations. Public quotations are limited to 120 words per acquired summary; the internal evidence packet retains exact section ranges for review.

Indications and users

K203845 · PDF page 3 ↗ Source 2

The Philips IntelliSite Pathology Solution (PIPS) is an automated digital slide creation, viewing, and management system.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

Recorded comparison and differences

K203845 · PDF page 5 ↗ Source 3

The subject device employs                                            the    same technological    characteristics compared to the                                                  currently
marketed                                                                    predicate device, with exception of the following modification implemented in the IMS
of the subject device:                                                                                                                                                Introduction of client side rendering.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: The summary’s comparison is a manufacturer statement about that submission. Investigate the actual design differences and cited records before considering any comparator or predicate.

Non-clinical evidence actually described

K203845 · PDF page 6 ↗ Source 4

Verification testing                           activities have been performed to                                                     support the substantial equivalence
determination for the modified IMS containing the client side rendering change, which covered:
       •                                     A pixel comparison test to determine pixel equivalence.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Treat these as documented evidence themes in this case, including any limitations or negative statements. Ask which protocols, design inputs and acceptance rationale would be justified for your product; these excerpts are not a mandatory test panel.

Extraction selection and limits

Select observed whole-line section headings or explicit colon-delimited inline labels on readable PDF pages, including the explicitly documented heading-spacing variants in this parser version. Preserve the original heading, character ranges and layout; do not repair excerpt text. Exclude letter boilerplate and uncertain pages. Stop at observed table headings; do not infer table columns or scalar results from layout text. Multi-column or suspicious split-numeric excerpts are excluded until reviewed alternate extraction is available. Original layout records remain retained; any alternate text has its own extractor-version locator and requires original-page review. For each dimension, prefer usable versioned alternate text where available, selecting its longest usable excerpt; otherwise select the longest usable original-layout excerpt. Ties preserve source order. Bounded to 64 PDF pages and 3,500 characters per section. This is a selection, not a complete dossier analysis.

Excluded extraction items: {}.

Known facts and deciding inputs

Known context: US. Confirm the organisation’s role, relevant activities and markets against the cited criteria.

Source factRecorded valueWhat to check
510(k) identifierK203845 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Generic device categoryPhilips IntelliSite Pathology Solution [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded applicantPhilips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
FDA product codePSY [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Decision date2021-09-17 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded decision codeSESE [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Submission typeAbbreviated [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Receipt date2020-12-31 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.

Prepare a differences and evidence worksheet

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

  1. Indications and users — what differs in our product?

    Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

    Useful evidence: Our proposed indication, user/population and use environment beside this exact recorded indication.

  2. Recorded comparison and differences — what differs in our product?

    The summary’s comparison is a manufacturer statement about that submission. Investigate the actual design differences and cited records before considering any comparator or predicate.

    Useful evidence: Feature-by-feature differences and the underlying cited documents; no automated predicate selection.

  3. Non-clinical evidence actually described — what differs in our product?

    Treat these as documented evidence themes in this case, including any limitations or negative statements. Ask which protocols, design inputs and acceptance rationale would be justified for your product; these excerpts are not a mandatory test panel.

    Useful evidence: Existing protocols/results and design-specific evidence gaps, with standard editions and scope reviewed separately.

Work packages and dependencies

Questions for providers

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.

FDA openFDA — 510(k) decision records ↗

2026-10-05 · retrieved 2026-10-06

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D01 · snapshot 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002

  • [1] device-510k-0001-of-0001.json:results[19618] · record 5219894f25907ea98ec399d035e138ddd3f4d26de0b84b27e8ed24b7d2fa3c0b
  • [5] Complete results array / fda-decision-context:K203845 · record whole dataset partition

FDA 510(k) summary — K203845 ↗

Tue, 18 Jul 2023 20:51:02 GMT · retrieved 2026-10-07

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot 209365990b1a23f3f930165c09fe3a62598c49ca1b2bf829c163fa324c5da08b

  • [2] PDF page 3 · record cd346cbdc65f520de27fadcb600aaf2fa10774013e8aae1c06bb0c62e96a79f6
  • [3] PDF page 5 · record 49c9e5ff0cba0b7bc58a2c578aca806e67885ff8b09c2210a8e55d162bea9665
  • [4] PDF page 6 · record 3a7dfdb41ef6301d403279643bd6ed6609f2672cbcabb32aea33c6cdc5c6f837

Prepare an editable project brief

Confirm the facts, scope and contact preference before sharing your project. Preparing this page sends no provider outreach.

Choose work packages to discuss

Compare FDA 510(k) Submission Services