Recorded device evidence

TRACOE vario (K203362): indications, design and recorded evidence

The acquired K203362 file contains product-specific indications and users, design and operating principle, non-clinical evidence actually described, performance evidence actually described sections. Compare these dated manufacturer statements with your own indication and design before commissioning evidence work. They describe this submission; they do not prescribe your testing, validate performance independently or establish a suitable predicate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Computed exact-code research

This decision beside its recorded product-code cohort

The 2021–2025 complete-year cohort contains 3 selected decisions under primary code JOH. 3 have valid reported receipt/decision pairs; 0 pairs are missing or invalid.

No quartiles are displayed: this complete-year cohort has fewer than 20 valid pairs.

The table shows the named decision and up to four latest exact-code research records through 2026-09-27. It can include partial-year records outside the complete-year cohort. The quartiles above use the full stated cohort, not this displayed selection.

Research recordRecorded deviceReceipt → decisionCalendar elapsed daysRecorded submission type
K203362 ↗ · this pageTRACOE vario2020-11-16 → 2021-08-05262Traditional
K251313 ↗Shiley™ Adult Flexible Tracheostomy Tube XLT with TaperGuard™ Cuff, Distal with Disposable Inner Cannula; Shiley™ Adult Flexible Tracheostomy Tube XLT with TaperGuard™ Cuff, Proximal with Disposable Inner Cannula; Shiley™ Adult Flexible Tracheostomy Tube XLT Cuffless, Distal with Disposable Inner Cannula ; Shiley™ Adult Flexible Tracheostomy Tube XLT Cuffless, Proximal with Disposable Inner Cannula; Shiley™ Adult Flexible Disposable Inner Cannula XLT2025-04-28 → 2025-12-29245Traditional
K210833 ↗Portex BLUxl Extra Length Tracheostomy Tube, BLUxl Suctionaid Extra Length Tracheostomy Tube, BLUxl Extra Length Tracheostomy Inner Cannula2021-03-19 → 2021-11-26252Traditional
K193077 ↗Shiley Adult Flexible Evac Tracheostomy Tube with TaperGuard Cuff2019-11-05 → 2020-06-01209Traditional
K193133 ↗Blue Rhino G1-Multi Percutaneous Tracheostomy Introducer Set, Blue Rhino G1-Multi Percutaneous Tracheostomy Introducer Tray, Blue Rhino G2-Multi Percutaneous Tracheostomy Introducer Set, Blue Rhino G2-Multi Percutaneous Tracheostomy Introducer Tray, Weinmann-Multi Percutaneous Tracheostomy Exchange Set2019-11-12 → 2019-12-1230Special

Use this comparison: select a record to investigate, read its actual indications and design, and document differences. A shared code or elapsed period cannot establish its relevance to your device.

Calendar elapsed days are not active FDA review time, a promised schedule or a success probability. The selection includes only the stated recorded decisions, not all applications. Latest records can postdate the named historical decision and are contextual research, not its predicates. Shared codes, summaries and observed records do not prove equivalence, current market availability, buyer applicability or predicate suitability.

Calculation, selection and source versions

Reuse the complete-endpoint exact-primary-code, documented SE-decision cohort and its stated cutoff/window. Retain its type-7 quartiles only when at least 20 valid date pairs are present. Independently subtract the named official record’s receipt date from its decision date; missing or negative pairs remain unknown. Show up to four latest exact-code research records, excluding the named ID. Parent analysis hash, source snapshots and calculation versions are retained.

Calculation: fda-named-decision-cohort-context-1; cutoff 2026-09-27; 1 parent records excluded; units record counts; calendar elapsed days.

Source snapshots: 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002.

Read beyond the decision row

Recorded evidence and differences to investigate

The summary is manufacturer-submitted context hosted by FDA. Negative/no-study statements are preserved. Evidence themes are not binding legal requirements.

Short opening excerpts identify the source sections. Read the linked original for the full study context, negative statements, tables and limitations. Public quotations are limited to 120 words per acquired summary; the internal evidence packet retains exact section ranges for review.

Indications and users

K203362 · PDF page 5 ↗ Source 2

TRACOE® vario Tracheostomy Tubes are indicated for providing tracheal access for airway management
especially to those patients with unusual anatomy or patients with thick necks.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

Design and operating principle

K203362 · PDF page 4 ↗ Source 3

TRACOE® vario Tracheostomy Tubes are suitable for adults and adolescents (12-21 years) where access
to the airway via a tracheostoma is required.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

Non-clinical evidence actually described

K203362 · PDF page 7 ↗ Source 4

Functionality testing of the TRACOE® vario Tracheostomy Tubes was performed in
accordance ISO 5366, and ISO 5356-1.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Treat these as documented evidence themes in this case, including any limitations or negative statements. Ask which protocols, design inputs and acceptance rationale would be justified for your product; these excerpts are not a mandatory test panel.

Performance evidence actually described

K203362 · PDF page 7 ↗ Source 4

The TRACOE® vario Tracheostomy Tubes, including the Minimally Traumatic
Insertion System, are the same in material, processing, and functionality as TRACOE legally US marketed
devices.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

Extraction selection and limits

Select observed whole-line section headings or explicit colon-delimited inline labels on readable PDF pages, including the explicitly documented heading-spacing variants in this parser version. Preserve the original heading, character ranges and layout; do not repair excerpt text. Exclude letter boilerplate and uncertain pages. Stop at observed table headings; do not infer table columns or scalar results from layout text. Multi-column or suspicious split-numeric excerpts are excluded until reviewed alternate extraction is available. Original layout records remain retained; any alternate text has its own extractor-version locator and requires original-page review. For each dimension, prefer usable versioned alternate text where available, selecting its longest usable excerpt; otherwise select the longest usable original-layout excerpt. Ties preserve source order. Bounded to 64 PDF pages and 3,500 characters per section. This is a selection, not a complete dossier analysis.

Excluded extraction items: {'uncertain_pdf_page': 1}.

Historical references beside dated FDA recognition metadata

Read each mention in the linked original summary, including statements that testing was not performed. Recognition metadata does not determine your testing needs, chosen edition or transition eligibility.

Reference in this historical summaryDesignation in the acquired FDA exportRecognition / entry dateRecorded transition-expiration dateSources
ISO 5366
Bench Testing
ISO 5366 First edition 2016-10-01
Anaesthetic and respiratory equipment - Tracheostomy tubes and connectors
1-117 · Complete
01/14/2019
Not recorded in this export rowSummary [4] · Metadata [5]
Read scope and recognition limits ↗
ISO 5356-1
Bench Testing
ISO 5356-1 Third edition 2004-05-15
Anaesthetic and respiratory equipment - Conical connectors: Part 1: Cones and sockets
1-62 · Complete
03/16/2012
Not recorded in this export rowSummary [4] · Metadata [6]
Read scope and recognition limits ↗
ISO 5356-1
Bench Testing
ANSI AAMI ISO 5356-1:2004
Anaesthetic and Respiratory Equipment - Conical Connectors - Part 1: Cones and Sockets
1-62 · Complete
03/16/2012
Not recorded in this export rowSummary [4] · Metadata [7]
Read scope and recognition limits ↗
ISO 15223-1
Bench Testing
ISO 15223-1 Fourth edition 2021-07 [Including AMD1: 2025]
Medical devices - Symbols to be used with information to be supplied by the manufacturer - Part 1: General requirements [Including Amendment 1 (2025)]
5-148 · Complete
12/22/2025
Not recorded in this export rowSummary [4] · Metadata [8]
Read scope and recognition limits ↗
ISO 15223-1
Bench Testing
ISO 15223-1 Fourth edition 2021-07
Medical devices - Symbols to be used with information to be supplied by the manufacturer - Part 1: General requirements
5-134 · Complete
12/20/2021
12/17/2028Summary [4] · Metadata [9]
Read scope and recognition limits ↗

Prepare for your provider: the proposed protocol/report edition, its justification for your device and the complete current FDA recognition sheet. In particular, inspect exclusions for partial recognition. An edition difference does not automatically make the historical evidence unusable.

Identifier-matching method and selection limits

Match explicit ISO/IEC identifiers in selected preserved summary excerpts to the acquired, count-reconciled FDA metadata export. Preserve the historical edition mention, current snapshot designations, entry dates, recognition extent and any recorded transition-expiration date as separate facts. No title-similarity, edition-equivalence, test-mandate or transition-eligibility inference. At most twenty matched occurrences and thirty metadata rows per reference; wide matches are held for separate review.

4 of 4 matched reference occurrences shown.

Known facts and deciding inputs

Known context: US. Confirm the organisation’s role, relevant activities and markets against the cited criteria.

Source factRecorded valueWhat to check
510(k) identifierK203362 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Generic device categoryTRACOE vario [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded applicantTracoe Medical GmbH [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
FDA product codeJOH [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Decision date2021-08-05 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded decision codeSESE [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Submission typeTraditional [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Receipt date2020-11-16 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.

Prepare a differences and evidence worksheet

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

  1. Indications and users — what differs in our product?

    Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

    Useful evidence: Our proposed indication, user/population and use environment beside this exact recorded indication.

  2. Design and operating principle — what differs in our product?

    Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

    Useful evidence: Design description, materials/components, accessory list and a differences matrix.

  3. Non-clinical evidence actually described — what differs in our product?

    Treat these as documented evidence themes in this case, including any limitations or negative statements. Ask which protocols, design inputs and acceptance rationale would be justified for your product; these excerpts are not a mandatory test panel.

    Useful evidence: Existing protocols/results and design-specific evidence gaps, with standard editions and scope reviewed separately.

  4. Performance evidence actually described — what differs in our product?

    The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

    Useful evidence: The cited narrative and full tables, underlying protocols/results and a reviewed comparison with the proposed product.

  5. Which edition and recognition limits would our provider rely on?

    Compare each historical reference below with the dated FDA metadata. Ask the specialist to justify the applicable scope and selected edition, read the complete supplementary sheet for partial-recognition exclusions, and investigate any recorded transition conditions. A difference in editions does not automatically make the earlier study unusable.

    Useful evidence: Proposed protocol/report edition, dated FDA recognition sheet with scope/exclusions, and a documented edition/transition rationale for the actual device.

Work packages and dependencies

Questions for providers

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.

FDA openFDA — 510(k) decision records ↗

2026-10-05 · retrieved 2026-10-06

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D01 · snapshot 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002

  • [1] device-510k-0001-of-0001.json:results[146703] · record b9bbd55b0dc4998d5a564a7ce06d5c5f1fbf6ed3c7715cf502b5b4510312545e
  • [10] Complete results array / fda-decision-context:K203362 · record whole dataset partition

FDA 510(k) summary — K203362 ↗

Sat, 07 Aug 2021 00:00:08 GMT · retrieved 2026-10-07

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot 04878b216132e91d1a30285307ed151fc05c204c103e59b8c666787ba0a99252

  • [2] PDF page 5 · record 5923ee2097aba4c4b7fe4d81dfa9f3386027c0d0e34714bf1b86508011cf32a5
  • [3] PDF page 4 · record e9fd89997d278628bcd83743202dc12764e956785a003bf0b88dd50a28e9bd86
  • [4] PDF page 7 · record c42c224fd23a73ab5bd698003f6d805385f00d7f3c0f91d2dccb27c647ea992c

FDA — recognition metadata exported through the official search form ↗

Version not stated by the source · retrieved 2026-10-07

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot 94ccf56dc846c7f6d78d6ad77dc6e87d1803ac3612af01d6894949e34c4a78d8

  • [5] CSV row 1144 · record fd3293d9febdbec100d52ac5a81ec98b9a4397d9348116040a76b5f12fe4a99b
  • [6] CSV row 1803 · record af0ed4c5d3a0c55024f5e51e12eb9a38d6f1cdaf9ba3561ba48b1a60279fee3d
  • [7] CSV row 1804 · record 9be476a6337ed8f39887ea3e1d4f67a220c392fc5c78ae45af8f386d3e7a1cb9
  • [8] CSV row 119 · record 4807867f84651019bfe4bf51c9e3ae597bf279825c2b2415648a2657e3903e82
  • [9] CSV row 709 · record 71e42ed9514a35b292e75a119b9fbf800bdf89917ca23000383092ab3ac90bc3

Prepare an editable project brief

Confirm the facts, scope and contact preference before sharing your project. Preparing this page sends no provider outreach.

Choose work packages to discuss

Compare FDA 510(k) Submission Services