Recorded device evidence

PATIENT SPECIFIC DISTAL FEMORAL (K140898): indications, design and recorded evidence

The acquired K140898 file contains product-specific indications and users, recorded comparison and differences, performance evidence actually described sections. Compare these dated manufacturer statements with your own indication and design before commissioning evidence work. They describe this submission; they do not prescribe your testing, validate performance independently or establish a suitable predicate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Computed exact-code research

This decision beside its recorded product-code cohort

The 2021–2025 complete-year cohort contains 14 selected decisions under primary code KRO. 14 have valid reported receipt/decision pairs; 0 pairs are missing or invalid.

No quartiles are displayed: this complete-year cohort has fewer than 20 valid pairs.

The table shows the named decision and up to four latest exact-code research records through 2026-09-27. It can include partial-year records outside the complete-year cohort. The quartiles above use the full stated cohort, not this displayed selection.

Research recordRecorded deviceReceipt → decisionCalendar elapsed daysRecorded submission type
K140898 ↗ · this pagePATIENT SPECIFIC DISTAL FEMORAL2014-04-08 → 2015-01-20287Special
K261898 ↗Triathlon® Knee System; Triathlon® Hinge Knee System; Scorpio® Total Knee System2026-06-05 → 2026-08-0662Traditional
K252898 ↗Triathlon® Tritanium® Asymmetric Patella; Triathlon® Tritanium® Symmetric Patella; Triathlon® Symmetric Patella; Triathlon® Asymmetric Patella; Scorpio® Universal Dome Patella; Triathlon® Hinge Bumper2025-09-11 → 2025-12-1595Traditional
K252303 ↗Stem Extension Line (USTAR II System)2025-07-24 → 2025-08-2229Special
K251665 ↗Triathlon® Hinge Knee System2025-05-30 → 2025-07-2556Traditional

Use this comparison: select a record to investigate, read its actual indications and design, and document differences. A shared code or elapsed period cannot establish its relevance to your device.

Calendar elapsed days are not active FDA review time, a promised schedule or a success probability. The selection includes only the stated recorded decisions, not all applications. Latest records can postdate the named historical decision and are contextual research, not its predicates. Shared codes, summaries and observed records do not prove equivalence, current market availability, buyer applicability or predicate suitability.

Calculation, selection and source versions

Reuse the complete-endpoint exact-primary-code, documented SE-decision cohort and its stated cutoff/window. Retain its type-7 quartiles only when at least 20 valid date pairs are present. Independently subtract the named official record’s receipt date from its decision date; missing or negative pairs remain unknown. Show up to four latest exact-code research records, excluding the named ID. Parent analysis hash, source snapshots and calculation versions are retained.

Calculation: fda-named-decision-cohort-context-1; cutoff 2026-09-27; 1 parent records excluded; units record counts; calendar elapsed days.

Source snapshots: 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002.

Read beyond the decision row

Recorded evidence and differences to investigate

The summary is manufacturer-submitted context hosted by FDA. Negative/no-study statements are preserved. Evidence themes are not binding legal requirements.

Short opening excerpts identify the source sections. Read the linked original for the full study context, negative statements, tables and limitations. Public quotations are limited to 120 words per acquired summary; the internal evidence packet retains exact section ranges for review.

Indications and users

K140898 · PDF page 3 ↗ Source 2

The Patient Specific Distal  Femur is intended  for the replacement of
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 diseased or deficient bone in the distal femur.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

Recorded comparison and differences

K140898 · PDF page 5 ↗ Source 3

The Patient Specific Distal Femur is a patient-specific implant s ystem that is used to replace
diseased or deficient bone in the distal femur.  Ever y confi guration includes a knee, femoral
shaft, femoral stem and collar.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: The summary’s comparison is a manufacturer statement about that submission. Investigate the actual design differences and cited records before considering any comparator or predicate.

Performance evidence actually described

K140898 · PDF page 6 ↗ Source 4

The Patient Specific Distal Femur has been evaluated through non-clinical performance testing
for disassembl y of the di stal femur and fatigue and wearing testing of the knee.  The Patient
Specific Distal  Femur met all of the acceptance criteria.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

Extraction selection and limits

Select observed whole-line section headings or explicit colon-delimited inline labels on readable PDF pages, including the explicitly documented heading-spacing variants in this parser version. Preserve the original heading, character ranges and layout; do not repair excerpt text. Exclude letter boilerplate and uncertain pages. Stop at observed table headings; do not infer table columns or scalar results from layout text. Multi-column or suspicious split-numeric excerpts are excluded until reviewed alternate extraction is available. Original layout records remain retained; any alternate text has its own extractor-version locator and requires original-page review. For each dimension, prefer usable versioned alternate text where available, selecting its longest usable excerpt; otherwise select the longest usable original-layout excerpt. Ties preserve source order. Bounded to 64 PDF pages and 3,500 characters per section. This is a selection, not a complete dossier analysis.

Excluded extraction items: {}.

Known facts and deciding inputs

Known context: US. Confirm the organisation’s role, relevant activities and markets against the cited criteria.

Source factRecorded valueWhat to check
510(k) identifierK140898 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Generic device categoryPATIENT SPECIFIC DISTAL FEMORAL [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded applicantStanmore Implants Worldwide , Ltd. [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
FDA product codeKRO [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Decision date2015-01-20 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded decision codeSESE [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Submission typeSpecial [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Receipt date2014-04-08 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.

Prepare a differences and evidence worksheet

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

  1. Indications and users — what differs in our product?

    Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

    Useful evidence: Our proposed indication, user/population and use environment beside this exact recorded indication.

  2. Recorded comparison and differences — what differs in our product?

    The summary’s comparison is a manufacturer statement about that submission. Investigate the actual design differences and cited records before considering any comparator or predicate.

    Useful evidence: Feature-by-feature differences and the underlying cited documents; no automated predicate selection.

  3. Performance evidence actually described — what differs in our product?

    The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

    Useful evidence: The cited narrative and full tables, underlying protocols/results and a reviewed comparison with the proposed product.

Work packages and dependencies

Questions for providers

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.

FDA openFDA — 510(k) decision records ↗

2026-10-05 · retrieved 2026-10-06

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D01 · snapshot 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002

  • [1] device-510k-0001-of-0001.json:results[58295] · record a515ee9902bac59e3e50c7e58b2958bae13003ee7b831623fd0c3c553eeb7d1e
  • [5] Complete results array / fda-decision-context:K140898 · record whole dataset partition

FDA 510(k) summary — K140898 ↗

Fri, 06 Feb 2015 18:23:55 GMT · retrieved 2026-10-07

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot 9c45be693c523e762216c5aa0b7d450d41232fd5f30bcd291b5632ae9ba1d8b9

  • [2] PDF page 3 · record 849f7a5c60ae09d0ca9079a322ef413ee64555e4e55fcc0979d788a7621e37b8
  • [3] PDF page 5 · record c378ce868c85d916700377834062988d9fc95d3df8723af2435410b082c39789
  • [4] PDF page 6 · record 6e4caa0b646163e63ebd0bf7e6f4266ebe7bd9f36abfdfaf46bd5744e4e6218d

Prepare an editable project brief

Confirm the facts, scope and contact preference before sharing your project. Preparing this page sends no provider outreach.

Choose work packages to discuss

Compare FDA 510(k) Submission Services