Recorded device evidence

AXIA RADIAL HEAD SYSTEM (K132735): indications, design and recorded evidence

The acquired K132735 file contains product-specific indications and users, design and operating principle, performance evidence actually described sections. Compare these dated manufacturer statements with your own indication and design before commissioning evidence work. They describe this submission; they do not prescribe your testing, validate performance independently or establish a suitable predicate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Source limits that change the comparison

The recorded implant is for uncemented use only

The original indication contains an explicit caution that the device is intended for uncemented use only. Do not extend the reference to cemented fixation merely because the product name or modular construction looks similar. [2]

Prepare or ask: Record the proposed fixation method, components and indication; ask what evidence supports any difference from this uncemented-only reference.

Dated manufacturer-submitted summary; current buyer applicability remains unresolved. PDF page 2 ↗

Computed exact-code research

This decision beside its recorded product-code cohort

The 2021–2025 complete-year cohort contains 4 selected decisions under primary code KWI. 4 have valid reported receipt/decision pairs; 0 pairs are missing or invalid.

No quartiles are displayed: this complete-year cohort has fewer than 20 valid pairs.

The table shows the named decision and up to four latest exact-code research records through 2026-09-27. It can include partial-year records outside the complete-year cohort. The quartiles above use the full stated cohort, not this displayed selection.

Research recordRecorded deviceReceipt → decisionCalendar elapsed daysRecorded submission type
K132735 ↗ · this pageAXIA RADIAL HEAD SYSTEM2013-09-03 → 2014-01-07126Traditional
K260624 ↗Arthrex Radial Head Replacement System2026-02-26 → 2026-07-30154Traditional
K233592 ↗BioPoly Radial Head Implant2023-11-08 → 2024-03-13126Traditional
K231188 ↗ALIGN Radial Head System2023-04-26 → 2023-09-28155Traditional
K213563 ↗DePuy Synthes Radial Head Replacement System2021-11-09 → 2022-03-18129Traditional

Use this comparison: select a record to investigate, read its actual indications and design, and document differences. A shared code or elapsed period cannot establish its relevance to your device.

Calendar elapsed days are not active FDA review time, a promised schedule or a success probability. The selection includes only the stated recorded decisions, not all applications. Latest records can postdate the named historical decision and are contextual research, not its predicates. Shared codes, summaries and observed records do not prove equivalence, current market availability, buyer applicability or predicate suitability.

Calculation, selection and source versions

Reuse the complete-endpoint exact-primary-code, documented SE-decision cohort and its stated cutoff/window. Retain its type-7 quartiles only when at least 20 valid date pairs are present. Independently subtract the named official record’s receipt date from its decision date; missing or negative pairs remain unknown. Show up to four latest exact-code research records, excluding the named ID. Parent analysis hash, source snapshots and calculation versions are retained.

Calculation: fda-named-decision-cohort-context-1; cutoff 2026-09-27; 1 parent records excluded; units record counts; calendar elapsed days.

Source snapshots: 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002.

Read beyond the decision row

Recorded evidence and differences to investigate

The summary is manufacturer-submitted context hosted by FDA. Negative/no-study statements are preserved. Evidence themes are not binding legal requirements.

Short opening excerpts identify the source sections. Read the linked original for the full study context, negative statements, tables and limitations. Public quotations are limited to 120 words per acquired summary; the internal evidence packet retains exact section ranges for review.

Indications and users

K132735 · PDF page 2 ↗ Source 2

The        Axia             Radial          Head            System         is intended         to          reduce      or          relie(e             pain         and             restore        function         and           motion        to
the       elbow.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

Design and operating principle

K132735 · PDF page 1 ↗ Source 3

The          Axia             Radial          Head         System               is a   2-part        system         comprised              of     a   radial           head              implant           and           a radial           stem
implant.         There       are          6 sizes       of       radial           heads      and         6 sizes      of   stems.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

Performance evidence actually described

K132735 · PDF page 4 ↗ Source 4

The        following   tests    were           performed            in this     submission:

          1.                      Modular   Connection      Testing         per   ASTM            F 2009.

An                   evaluation              of               the              taper           connection                 was              performed                   to             determine                the                resistance              to               component
disassembly.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

Extraction selection and limits

Select observed whole-line section headings or explicit colon-delimited inline labels on readable PDF pages, including the explicitly documented heading-spacing variants in this parser version. Preserve the original heading, character ranges and layout; do not repair excerpt text. Exclude letter boilerplate and uncertain pages. Stop at observed table headings; do not infer table columns or scalar results from layout text. Multi-column or suspicious split-numeric excerpts are excluded until reviewed alternate extraction is available. Original layout records remain retained; any alternate text has its own extractor-version locator and requires original-page review. For each dimension, prefer usable versioned alternate text where available, selecting its longest usable excerpt; otherwise select the longest usable original-layout excerpt. Ties preserve source order. Bounded to 64 PDF pages and 3,500 characters per section. This is a selection, not a complete dossier analysis.

Excluded extraction items: {}.

Known facts and deciding inputs

Known context: US. Confirm the organisation’s role, relevant activities and markets against the cited criteria.

Source factRecorded valueWhat to check
510(k) identifierK132735 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Generic device categoryAXIA RADIAL HEAD SYSTEM [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded applicantImds (Innovative MEdical Device Systems) - Leis ME [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
FDA product codeKWI [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Decision date2014-01-07 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded decision codeSESE [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Submission typeTraditional [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Receipt date2013-09-03 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.

Prepare a differences and evidence worksheet

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

  1. Indications and users — what differs in our product?

    Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

    Useful evidence: Our proposed indication, user/population and use environment beside this exact recorded indication.

  2. Design and operating principle — what differs in our product?

    Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

    Useful evidence: Design description, materials/components, accessory list and a differences matrix.

  3. Performance evidence actually described — what differs in our product?

    The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

    Useful evidence: The cited narrative and full tables, underlying protocols/results and a reviewed comparison with the proposed product.

Work packages and dependencies

Questions for providers

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.

FDA openFDA — 510(k) decision records ↗

2026-10-05 · retrieved 2026-10-06

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D01 · snapshot 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002

  • [1] device-510k-0001-of-0001.json:results[53771] · record 894cceae01a6e15020cef5e75cdad6dcd362d8e878d88bab3f52d453bf7ba88d
  • [5] Complete results array / fda-decision-context:K132735 · record whole dataset partition

FDA 510(k) summary — K132735 ↗

Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:52:58 GMT · retrieved 2026-10-07

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot f1859f96d27dee220ced04688c1584c1823fcd68706279eabed90aebe8fa4310

  • [2] PDF page 2 · record 7c095ab7e4f85f69f874f940ba6d31f0371d8964268a436c91c40469f1e34cec
  • [3] PDF page 1 · record 89a1079ed6240a8914bac59c7013d6e80f272f928a1ab91829f62019d698dac4
  • [4] PDF page 4 · record 6a6fdf956a030055df016fcf38f534e4cb666cfd05d3b021ed58284b1b09493f

Prepare an editable project brief

Confirm the facts, scope and contact preference before sharing your project. Preparing this page sends no provider outreach.

Choose work packages to discuss

Compare FDA 510(k) Submission Services