Recorded device evidence

MEDTRONIC STRATA NSC LUMBOPERITONEAL VALVE AND SHUNT SYSTEM (K123524): indications, design and recorded evidence

The acquired K123524 file contains product-specific indications and users, design and operating principle, recorded comparison and differences, performance evidence actually described sections. Compare these dated manufacturer statements with your own indication and design before commissioning evidence work. They describe this submission; they do not prescribe your testing, validate performance independently or establish a suitable predicate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-08. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Computed exact-code research

This decision beside its recorded product-code cohort

The 2021–2025 complete-year cohort contains 21 selected decisions under primary code JXG. 21 have valid reported receipt/decision pairs; 0 pairs are missing or invalid.

Calendar elapsed days: lower quartile 90.0, median 114.0, upper quartile 244.0. These are recorded calendar differences, not active FDA review time.

The table shows the named decision and up to four latest exact-code research records through 2026-09-27. It can include partial-year records outside the complete-year cohort. The quartiles above use the full stated cohort, not this displayed selection.

Research recordRecorded deviceReceipt → decisionCalendar elapsed daysRecorded submission type
K123524 ↗ · this pageMEDTRONIC STRATA NSC LUMBOPERITONEAL VALVE AND SHUNT SYSTEM2012-11-15 → 2013-02-1390Traditional
K261004 ↗Codman® Distal Peritoneal Catheter, Barium Open End (82-1682); Codman® HOLTER® Peritoneal Catheter (SALMON Design) (82-1684)2026-03-26 → 2026-06-2389Traditional
K251598 ↗Intellidrop2025-05-27 → 2025-12-10197Traditional
K250636 ↗Sophy Mini Monopressure Valve (SM1)2025-03-03 → 2025-11-28270Traditional
K252514 ↗EVAC-MRI2025-08-11 → 2025-11-0586Traditional

Use this comparison: select a record to investigate, read its actual indications and design, and document differences. A shared code or elapsed period cannot establish its relevance to your device.

Calendar elapsed days are not active FDA review time, a promised schedule or a success probability. The selection includes only the stated recorded decisions, not all applications. Latest records can postdate the named historical decision and are contextual research, not its predicates. Shared codes, summaries and observed records do not prove equivalence, current market availability, buyer applicability or predicate suitability.

Calculation, selection and source versions

Reuse the complete-endpoint exact-primary-code, documented SE-decision cohort and its stated cutoff/window. Retain its type-7 quartiles only when at least 20 valid date pairs are present. Independently subtract the named official record’s receipt date from its decision date; missing or negative pairs remain unknown. Show up to four latest exact-code research records, excluding the named ID. Parent analysis hash, source snapshots and calculation versions are retained.

Calculation: fda-named-decision-cohort-context-1; cutoff 2026-09-27; 0 parent records excluded; units record counts; calendar elapsed days.

Source snapshots: 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002.

Read beyond the decision row

Recorded evidence and differences to investigate

The summary is manufacturer-submitted context hosted by FDA. Negative/no-study statements are preserved. Evidence themes are not binding legal requirements.

Short opening excerpts identify the source sections. Read the linked original for the full study context, negative statements, tables and limitations. Public quotations are limited to 120 words per acquired summary; the internal evidence packet retains exact section ranges for review.

Indications and users

K123524 · PDF page 1 ↗ Source 2

The    Strata       NSC           Lumboperitoneal           Shunt     System           provides   continued        cerebrospinal        fluid    (CSF)              flow   from
   the       subarachnoid        space          into   the      peritoneal      cavity.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

Design and operating principle

K123524 · PDF page 1 ↗ Source 2

The         Strata       NSC            Lumboperitoneal       Valve       and    Shunt       Systems       are     comprised          of     lumbar     and      peritoneal
catheters,        valves     and       accessories.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

Recorded comparison and differences

K123524 · PDF page 1 ↗ Source 2

The     Strata       NSC           Lumboperitoneal           Valve   and        Shunt     Systems
incorporate      the     same     technological       characteristics        as that     of the         predicate   devices    and      are       identical to       the
currently       marketed        versions.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: The summary’s comparison is a manufacturer statement about that submission. Investigate the actual design differences and cited records before considering any comparator or predicate.

Performance evidence actually described

K123524 · PDF page 2 ↗ Source 3

Read this statement in the original PDF; no complete statement fits the short excerpt.

Compare with your product: The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

Extraction selection and limits

Select observed whole-line section headings or explicit colon-delimited inline labels on readable PDF pages, including the explicitly documented heading-spacing variants in this parser version. Preserve the original heading, character ranges and layout; do not repair excerpt text. Exclude letter boilerplate and uncertain pages. Stop at observed table headings; do not infer table columns or scalar results from layout text. Multi-column or suspicious split-numeric excerpts are excluded until reviewed alternate extraction is available. Original layout records remain retained; any alternate text has its own extractor-version locator and requires original-page review. For each dimension, prefer usable versioned alternate text where available, selecting its longest usable excerpt; otherwise select the longest usable original-layout excerpt. Ties preserve source order. Bounded to 64 PDF pages and 3,500 characters per section. This is a selection, not a complete dossier analysis.

Excluded extraction items: {}.

Known facts and deciding inputs

Known context: US. Confirm the organisation’s role, relevant activities and markets against the cited criteria.

Source factRecorded valueWhat to check
510(k) identifierK123524 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Generic device categoryMEDTRONIC STRATA NSC LUMBOPERITONEAL VALVE AND SHUNT SYSTEM [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded applicantMedtronic Neurosurgery [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
FDA product codeJXG [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Decision date2013-02-13 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded decision codeSESE [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Submission typeTraditional [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Receipt date2012-11-15 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.

Prepare a differences and evidence worksheet

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

  1. Indications and users — what differs in our product?

    Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

    Useful evidence: Our proposed indication, user/population and use environment beside this exact recorded indication.

  2. Design and operating principle — what differs in our product?

    Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

    Useful evidence: Design description, materials/components, accessory list and a differences matrix.

  3. Recorded comparison and differences — what differs in our product?

    The summary’s comparison is a manufacturer statement about that submission. Investigate the actual design differences and cited records before considering any comparator or predicate.

    Useful evidence: Feature-by-feature differences and the underlying cited documents; no automated predicate selection.

  4. Performance evidence actually described — what differs in our product?

    The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

    Useful evidence: The cited narrative and full tables, underlying protocols/results and a reviewed comparison with the proposed product.

Work packages and dependencies

Questions for providers

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.

FDA openFDA — 510(k) decision records ↗

2026-10-05 · retrieved 2026-10-06

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D01 · snapshot 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002

  • [1] device-510k-0001-of-0001.json:results[29478] · record 0373c573d0aef4715ce79787c28168751e7c80798ccda923fddae1c37f89345f
  • [4] Complete results array / fda-decision-context:K123524 · record whole dataset partition

FDA 510(k) summary — K123524 ↗

Fri, 08 Mar 2013 20:18:42 GMT · retrieved 2026-10-08

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot cdfb579c4536c0a47e0184e64b279206d338caed9a908759b3fe1b54bedd6658

  • [2] PDF page 1 · record 2965a4ecd1d2b186e079a9ff6cf7f3e4f0d38103d7317bc13f67d7de3933d737
  • [3] PDF page 2 · record 34c2a7713b9dca38f66c749d4742035d6dd97a18b67d99649e399a32a5aacbfa

Prepare an editable project brief

Confirm the facts, scope and contact preference before sharing your project. Preparing this page sends no provider outreach.

Choose work packages to discuss

Compare FDA 510(k) Submission Services