Recorded device evidence

SCOUT SPORT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS MEASUREMENT SYSTEM (K121512): indications, design and recorded evidence

The acquired K121512 file contains product-specific indications and users, design and operating principle, non-clinical evidence actually described sections. Compare these dated manufacturer statements with your own indication and design before commissioning evidence work. They describe this submission; they do not prescribe your testing, validate performance independently or establish a suitable predicate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Computed exact-code research

This decision beside its recorded product-code cohort

The 2021–2025 complete-year cohort contains 4 selected decisions under primary code EWO. 4 have valid reported receipt/decision pairs; 0 pairs are missing or invalid.

No quartiles are displayed: this complete-year cohort has fewer than 20 valid pairs.

The table shows the named decision and up to four latest exact-code research records through 2026-09-27. It can include partial-year records outside the complete-year cohort. The quartiles above use the full stated cohort, not this displayed selection.

Research recordRecorded deviceReceipt → decisionCalendar elapsed daysRecorded submission type
K121512 ↗ · this pageSCOUT SPORT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS MEASUREMENT SYSTEM2012-05-21 → 2012-07-2666Traditional
K234095 ↗OtoNova/OtoNova Pro2023-12-26 → 2024-06-21178Traditional
K240430 ↗Otoport Pro2024-02-14 → 2024-03-1530Special
K231545 ↗hearOAE2023-05-30 → 2023-10-27150Traditional
K213345 ↗Sentiero, AuDX, AuDX PRO, Sentiero Desktop, AuDX PRO Flex, Sentiero Advanced, NavPRO ONE2021-10-08 → 2022-06-22257Traditional

Use this comparison: select a record to investigate, read its actual indications and design, and document differences. A shared code or elapsed period cannot establish its relevance to your device.

Calendar elapsed days are not active FDA review time, a promised schedule or a success probability. The selection includes only the stated recorded decisions, not all applications. Latest records can postdate the named historical decision and are contextual research, not its predicates. Shared codes, summaries and observed records do not prove equivalence, current market availability, buyer applicability or predicate suitability.

Calculation, selection and source versions

Reuse the complete-endpoint exact-primary-code, documented SE-decision cohort and its stated cutoff/window. Retain its type-7 quartiles only when at least 20 valid date pairs are present. Independently subtract the named official record’s receipt date from its decision date; missing or negative pairs remain unknown. Show up to four latest exact-code research records, excluding the named ID. Parent analysis hash, source snapshots and calculation versions are retained.

Calculation: fda-named-decision-cohort-context-1; cutoff 2026-09-27; 0 parent records excluded; units record counts; calendar elapsed days.

Source snapshots: 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002.

Read beyond the decision row

Recorded evidence and differences to investigate

The summary is manufacturer-submitted context hosted by FDA. Negative/no-study statements are preserved. Evidence themes are not binding legal requirements.

Short opening excerpts identify the source sections. Read the linked original for the full study context, negative statements, tables and limitations. Public quotations are limited to 120 words per acquired summary; the internal evidence packet retains exact section ranges for review.

Indications and users

K121512 · PDF page 6 ↗ Source 2

The       Scout      Sport      Otoacoustic      Emissions        Measurement             System      delivers       controlled       acoustic    signals      in the
ear   canal      and    measures      the        resulting     evoked         otoacoustic    emissions     (OA~s)          that are      generated        by      the
outer   hair      cells  of the        inner     ear.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

Design and operating principle

K121512 · PDF page 1 ↗ Source 3

The        Scout     Sport       Otoacoustic         Emissions         Measurement
                                                                                           System        delivers        controlled      acoustic     signals           in the     ear      canal
                                                                                           and       measures         the          resulting         evoked        otoacoustic     emissions
                                                                                           (OAEs)           that       are    generated           by       the      outer          hair    cells  of   the      inner
                                                                                           ear.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

Non-clinical evidence actually described

K121512 · PDF page 3 ↗ Source 4

Design        verification         and    validation        were        performed             to         assure
                                                                that       the      Scout      Sport         Otoacoustic       Emissions         Measurement
                                                                 System       meets           its          performance       specifications     and
                                                                demonstrates           equivalence     to         the                 functionalities      present       in
                                                                the         respective        predicate         devices.

Compare with your product: Treat these as documented evidence themes in this case, including any limitations or negative statements. Ask which protocols, design inputs and acceptance rationale would be justified for your product; these excerpts are not a mandatory test panel.

Extraction selection and limits

Select observed whole-line section headings or explicit colon-delimited inline labels on readable PDF pages, including the explicitly documented heading-spacing variants in this parser version. Preserve the original heading, character ranges and layout; do not repair excerpt text. Exclude letter boilerplate and uncertain pages. Stop at observed table headings; do not infer table columns or scalar results from layout text. Multi-column or suspicious split-numeric excerpts are excluded until reviewed alternate extraction is available. Original layout records remain retained; any alternate text has its own extractor-version locator and requires original-page review. For each dimension, prefer usable versioned alternate text where available, selecting its longest usable excerpt; otherwise select the longest usable original-layout excerpt. Ties preserve source order. Bounded to 64 PDF pages and 3,500 characters per section. This is a selection, not a complete dossier analysis.

Excluded extraction items: {}.

Known facts and deciding inputs

Known context: US. Confirm the organisation’s role, relevant activities and markets against the cited criteria.

Source factRecorded valueWhat to check
510(k) identifierK121512 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Generic device categorySCOUT SPORT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS MEASUREMENT SYSTEM [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded applicantBio-Logic Systems Corp. [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
FDA product codeEWO [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Decision date2012-07-26 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded decision codeSESE [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Submission typeTraditional [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Receipt date2012-05-21 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.

Prepare a differences and evidence worksheet

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

  1. Indications and users — what differs in our product?

    Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

    Useful evidence: Our proposed indication, user/population and use environment beside this exact recorded indication.

  2. Design and operating principle — what differs in our product?

    Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

    Useful evidence: Design description, materials/components, accessory list and a differences matrix.

  3. Non-clinical evidence actually described — what differs in our product?

    Treat these as documented evidence themes in this case, including any limitations or negative statements. Ask which protocols, design inputs and acceptance rationale would be justified for your product; these excerpts are not a mandatory test panel.

    Useful evidence: Existing protocols/results and design-specific evidence gaps, with standard editions and scope reviewed separately.

Work packages and dependencies

Questions for providers

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.

FDA openFDA — 510(k) decision records ↗

2026-10-05 · retrieved 2026-10-06

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D01 · snapshot 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002

  • [1] device-510k-0001-of-0001.json:results[62039] · record 52a36055437f2e7c84a69ef02d8edbe74aa4376cdf5a9fa0f96c6845e27a1d95
  • [5] Complete results array / fda-decision-context:K121512 · record whole dataset partition

FDA 510(k) summary — K121512 ↗

Mon, 06 Aug 2012 22:52:43 GMT · retrieved 2026-10-07

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot 7d9d1ac29fa72639017c483af1a8ff4e2dd6c6504b664b06a524217e1801ed10

  • [2] PDF page 6 · record 977e3c89f7c62c9c5fc403b5407413471c2212f2ae276bd81de3df5fde1d40da
  • [3] PDF page 1 · record 6cac360cb252a0627bc2d4e7e6ffc9ed4eefc4f5c7303da8309737c5163b9fab
  • [4] PDF page 3 · record 35d5d0bdc823e0b7f4e6578f058c042291db5be689d258b3b5295b02fe8e6fc5

Prepare an editable project brief

Confirm the facts, scope and contact preference before sharing your project. Preparing this page sends no provider outreach.

Choose work packages to discuss

Compare FDA 510(k) Submission Services