Recorded device evidence

PEARL DIABETES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (K100567): indications, design and recorded evidence

The acquired K100567 file contains product-specific indications and users, design and operating principle, recorded comparison and differences, performance evidence actually described sections. Compare these dated manufacturer statements with your own indication and design before commissioning evidence work. They describe this submission; they do not prescribe your testing, validate performance independently or establish a suitable predicate.

Evidence retrieved 2026-10-07. Source versions and topic-specific limits are listed below.

Computed exact-code research

This decision beside its recorded product-code cohort

The 2021–2025 complete-year cohort contains 5 selected decisions under primary code LZG. 5 have valid reported receipt/decision pairs; 0 pairs are missing or invalid.

No quartiles are displayed: this complete-year cohort has fewer than 20 valid pairs.

The table shows the named decision and up to four latest exact-code research records through 2026-09-27. It can include partial-year records outside the complete-year cohort. The quartiles above use the full stated cohort, not this displayed selection.

Research recordRecorded deviceReceipt → decisionCalendar elapsed daysRecorded submission type
K100567 ↗ · this pagePEARL DIABETES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM2010-03-01 → 2011-05-10435Traditional
K262153 ↗Pivot Insulin Delivery System2026-06-26 → 2026-09-0268Traditional
K253534 ↗Pivot Insulin Delivery System2025-11-13 → 2026-04-08146Traditional
K240158 ↗Modular Medical MODD1 Insulin Delivery System2024-01-19 → 2024-09-04229Traditional
K241622 ↗Extended Reservoir; MiniMed Reservoir2024-06-05 → 2024-07-0227Special

Use this comparison: select a record to investigate, read its actual indications and design, and document differences. A shared code or elapsed period cannot establish its relevance to your device.

Calendar elapsed days are not active FDA review time, a promised schedule or a success probability. The selection includes only the stated recorded decisions, not all applications. Latest records can postdate the named historical decision and are contextual research, not its predicates. Shared codes, summaries and observed records do not prove equivalence, current market availability, buyer applicability or predicate suitability.

Calculation, selection and source versions

Reuse the complete-endpoint exact-primary-code, documented SE-decision cohort and its stated cutoff/window. Retain its type-7 quartiles only when at least 20 valid date pairs are present. Independently subtract the named official record’s receipt date from its decision date; missing or negative pairs remain unknown. Show up to four latest exact-code research records, excluding the named ID. Parent analysis hash, source snapshots and calculation versions are retained.

Calculation: fda-named-decision-cohort-context-1; cutoff 2026-09-27; 6 parent records excluded; units record counts; calendar elapsed days.

Source snapshots: 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002.

Read beyond the decision row

Recorded evidence and differences to investigate

The summary is manufacturer-submitted context hosted by FDA. Negative/no-study statements are preserved. Evidence themes are not binding legal requirements.

Short opening excerpts identify the source sections. Read the linked original for the full study context, negative statements, tables and limitations. Public quotations are limited to 120 words per acquired summary; the internal evidence packet retains exact section ranges for review.

Indications and users

K100567 · PDF page 6 ↗ Source 2

For    the   continuous,        subcutaneous      delivery    of   insulin      at
                                                                                         programmable           basal    and       bolus        rates      for   the       management      of
                                                                                        diabetes          mellitus      in adult    patients         requiring       insulin.

Compare with your product: Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

Design and operating principle

K100567 · PDF page 1 ↗ Source 3

The          Pearl        Diabetes       Management           System         is a continuous,          programmable           insulin   delivery
system.           It consists    of    a controller,        a single     use      pump      body,          a single    use        adapter      and
associated        accessories.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

Recorded comparison and differences

K100567 · PDF page 2 ↗ Source 4

The         system        uses      existing      established     technology,        materials,       and       construction       techniques.ratchet        drive      mechanism     to       apply      controlled      and      accurate    force       to   the'
The         system    employs        a
plunger      movement     of   the       insulin      cartridge.

The excerpt is shortened at a complete statement. Read the complete section in the original PDF before interpreting the evidence.

Compare with your product: The summary’s comparison is a manufacturer statement about that submission. Investigate the actual design differences and cited records before considering any comparator or predicate.

Performance evidence actually described

K100567 · PDF page 2 ↗ Source 4

Read this statement in the original PDF; no complete statement fits the short excerpt.

Compare with your product: The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

Extraction selection and limits

Select observed whole-line section headings or explicit colon-delimited inline labels on readable PDF pages, including the explicitly documented heading-spacing variants in this parser version. Preserve the original heading, character ranges and layout; do not repair excerpt text. Exclude letter boilerplate and uncertain pages. Stop at observed table headings; do not infer table columns or scalar results from layout text. Multi-column or suspicious split-numeric excerpts are excluded until reviewed alternate extraction is available. Original layout records remain retained; any alternate text has its own extractor-version locator and requires original-page review. For each dimension, prefer usable versioned alternate text where available, selecting its longest usable excerpt; otherwise select the longest usable original-layout excerpt. Ties preserve source order. Bounded to 64 PDF pages and 3,500 characters per section. This is a selection, not a complete dossier analysis.

Excluded extraction items: {}.

Known facts and deciding inputs

Known context: US. Confirm the organisation’s role, relevant activities and markets against the cited criteria.

Source factRecorded valueWhat to check
510(k) identifierK100567 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Generic device categoryPEARL DIABETES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded applicantM2 Group Holdings, Inc. [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
FDA product codeLZG [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Decision date2011-05-10 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Recorded decision codeSESE [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Submission typeTraditional [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.
Receipt date2010-03-01 [1]Dated official record fact; not proof of current commercial availability or applicability to another device.

Prepare a differences and evidence worksheet

Use this checklist to gather your business or product details before speaking with a specialist. The items below explain what to record and suggest useful supporting documents. You can add your own answers in the editable project brief.

  1. Indications and users — what differs in our product?

    Compare the recorded indication, population, body site and use environment with your proposed label. Record each change instead of assuming the primary code settles intended use.

    Useful evidence: Our proposed indication, user/population and use environment beside this exact recorded indication.

  2. Design and operating principle — what differs in our product?

    Compare physical design, materials, energy, accessories and operating principle with your design. Ask which documented differences change the evidence scope.

    Useful evidence: Design description, materials/components, accessory list and a differences matrix.

  3. Recorded comparison and differences — what differs in our product?

    The summary’s comparison is a manufacturer statement about that submission. Investigate the actual design differences and cited records before considering any comparator or predicate.

    Useful evidence: Feature-by-feature differences and the underlying cited documents; no automated predicate selection.

  4. Performance evidence actually described — what differs in our product?

    The source labels this section as performance data. Determine which described evidence is bench, software, biological or clinical from the actual narrative and original tables; the section label alone does not settle that distinction or prescribe your testing.

    Useful evidence: The cited narrative and full tables, underlying protocols/results and a reviewed comparison with the proposed product.

Work packages and dependencies

What needs to happen first

Questions for providers

Sources and data dates

Read the official document in context. The audit details identify the precise locators and preserved versions used for this page.

FDA openFDA — 510(k) decision records ↗

2026-10-05 · retrieved 2026-10-06

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D01 · snapshot 5a86994ba49a37e71e09be96803fd51981c6c43eaa96caab41aea2b188bfe002

  • [1] device-510k-0001-of-0001.json:results[11193] · record fe3c0bf0df60cfedf7657078d15edc599a64b55f1877f67f1009afdb7eef5c22
  • [5] Complete results array / fda-decision-context:K100567 · record whole dataset partition

FDA 510(k) summary — K100567 ↗

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 04:47:22 GMT · retrieved 2026-10-07

Audit details: precise locators and snapshot identifiers

Source key D02 · snapshot 7077579a89a6e398ecd9625b9b19ca290629b0b8b1c487cc9fb6bd3b3b83dd79

  • [2] PDF page 6 · record 6ac1dc744d3510a7575d3f44769841257bd91405189fef10b4217f967a9150d9
  • [3] PDF page 1 · record d97c68cfa1c3b49c3cda024081ecda515e8624af646f46a4a9c338cd284ee82a
  • [4] PDF page 2 · record 27f6e2ca541b667e04bad83b57364bf56b9da59548f591d63f5c53cd267a9c43

Prepare an editable project brief

Confirm the facts, scope and contact preference before sharing your project. Preparing this page sends no provider outreach.

Choose work packages to discuss

Compare FDA 510(k) Submission Services

Usability / Human Factors Testing