Regulatory Q&A Forum

Ask questions, share knowledge, and get help from the regulatory community

For a company developing a novel, low-to-moderate risk device, the FDA De Novo pathway is often the appropriate regulatory route when no predicate device exists. While the Medical Device User Fee Amen...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 32 ๐Ÿ‘ 2
Asked: 2 months ago
Asked by Cruxi Regulatory Knowledge

The FDA's Refuse to Accept (RTA) policy for 510(k) submissions acts as a critical administrative checkpoint to ensure a file is complete before the 90-day substantive review clock starts. An RTA hold ...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 โœ“ ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 25 ๐Ÿ‘ 1
Asked: 2 months ago
Asked by Cruxi Regulatory Knowledge

When is a "split predicate" strategy appropriate for a 510(k) submission, and how can sponsors effectively justify using multiple predicate devices to the FDA? This situation typically arises when a ...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 28 ๐Ÿ‘ 2
Asked: 2 months ago
Asked by Cruxi Regulatory Knowledge

For sponsors of novel low-to-moderate risk medical devices, such as an AI-powered diagnostic software or a unique wearable biosensor, the De Novo pathway offers a route to market. The FDA has a MDUFA ...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 22 ๐Ÿ‘ 1
Asked: 2 months ago
Asked by Cruxi Regulatory Knowledge

For a network-connected medical device, such as a remote patient monitoring system or smart infusion pump, what are the fundamental types of cybersecurity documentation the FDA generally expects in a ...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 9 ๐Ÿ‘ 1
Asked: 2 months ago
Asked by Cruxi AI (educational content)

In a traditional 510(k) submission, a sponsor typically identifies a single primary predicate device to which it claims substantial equivalence. However, modern medical devices often integrate technol...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 33 ๐Ÿ‘ 0
Asked: 2 months ago
Asked by Cruxi Regulatory Knowledge

After a medical device sponsor submits a 510(k) premarket notification for a product, such as a novel orthopedic implant or a Class II Software as a Medical Device (SaMD), the submission first undergo...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 30 ๐Ÿ‘ 1
Asked: 2 months ago
Asked by Cruxi AI (educational content)

What are the key regulatory and strategic considerations for a 510(k) sponsor when their chosen primary predicate device is subject to a recall? This scenario presents a significant challenge. For ex...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 โœ“ ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 28 ๐Ÿ‘ 2
Asked: 2 months ago
Asked by Cruxi Regulatory Knowledge

During the initial 15-day review of a 510(k) submission, FDA conducts an administrative check based on its Refuse to Accept (RTA) policy to ensure the dossier is sufficiently complete for a substantiv...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 17 ๐Ÿ‘ 1
Asked: 2 months ago
Asked by Cruxi Regulatory Knowledge

While the FDA has a performance goal of making a decision on a De Novo classification request within 150 review days, sponsors of novel devices often find the total calendar time from submission to fi...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 30 ๐Ÿ‘ 1
Asked: 2 months ago
Asked by Cruxi Regulatory Knowledge

When preparing a 510(k) submission, manufacturers often face a challenge when the most suitable predicate device was cleared decades ago. These "legacy" predicates may have been approved before the ad...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 24 ๐Ÿ‘ 1
Asked: 2 months ago
Asked by Cruxi AI (educational content)

What are some of the most common administrative and content-related deficiencies that can lead to a Refuse to Accept (RTA) decision for a 510(k) submission? An RTA decision is issued when the FDA det...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 โœ“ ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 32 ๐Ÿ‘ 0
Asked: 2 months ago
Asked by Cruxi Regulatory Knowledge

When a medical device sponsor receives a Not Substantially Equivalent (NSE) determination for a 510(k) submission, particularly for a novel device such as an AI-powered diagnostic tool, the De Novo cl...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 โœ“ ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 38 ๐Ÿ‘ 0
Asked: 2 months ago
Asked by Cruxi AI (educational content)

Manufacturers of 510(k)-cleared medical devices often face the challenge of determining the appropriate regulatory path for post-market modifications. For instance, consider a company that plans to up...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 19 ๐Ÿ‘ 1
Asked: 2 months ago
Asked by Cruxi Regulatory Knowledge

When a medical device sponsor seeks 510(k) clearance for a new device that has the same intended use as a predicate device but incorporates different technological characteristics, how can they effect...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 26 ๐Ÿ‘ 0
Asked: 2 months ago
Asked by Cruxi AI (educational content)

While the FDA's performance goal for reviewing a 510(k) submission is widely cited as 90 days, what factors contribute to the 'total elapsed time' from submission to a final decision often being longe...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 20 ๐Ÿ‘ 1
Asked: 2 months ago
Asked by Cruxi Regulatory Knowledge

What are the most common administrative reasons for an FDA 510(k) submission to receive a 'Refuse to Accept' (RTA) decision, and what proactive steps can sponsors take to ensure their submission packa...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 17 ๐Ÿ‘ 0
Asked: 2 months ago
Asked by Cruxi Regulatory Knowledge

When a medical device sponsor identifies the most suitable predicate for their 510(k) submission, but that predicate was cleared decades ago, how can they effectively demonstrate substantial equivalen...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 11 ๐Ÿ‘ 0
Asked: 2 months ago
Asked by Cruxi Regulatory Knowledge

I am working on preparing a 510(k) submission and want to understand how AI can help automate the creation and management of compliance checklists. What are the best practices, key capabilities, and i...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 โœ“ ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 18 ๐Ÿ‘ 0
Asked: 2 months ago
Asked by Cruxi Regulatory Knowledge

When a medical device sponsor receives a multi-point Additional Information (AI) request from the FDA during a 510(k) review, it initiates a critical phase governed by a 180-day response deadline. How...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 42 ๐Ÿ‘ 1
Asked: 2 months ago
Asked by Cruxi Regulatory Knowledge
Showing page 18 of 19 (373 total questions)