Regulatory Q&A Forum
Ask questions, share knowledge, and get help from the regulatory community
Does my medical device need clinical data for a 510k clearance?
When preparing a 510(k) for a device that introduces new technological features compared to its predicate—such as an orthopedic implant with a novel surface coating or a diagnostic software with a new...
How do I choose the best predicate device for a 510k submission?
When preparing a 510(k) submission for a Class II device that incorporates an incremental but significant technological change, such as an orthopedic implant with a novel surface material designed to ...
For a manufacturer of a Class I medical device, such as a non-sterile tongue depressor or an elastic bandage, that is exempt from 510(k) premarket notification, what constitutes a robust compliance fr...
What changes to a cleared device require a new 510k submission?
For manufacturers of a 510(k)-cleared device, the decision between documenting a modification with a 'Letter to File' versus submitting a new 510(k) is a recurring challenge. Beyond the foundational r...
How do I justify a predicate device with different technological characteristics?
When a sponsor's new medical device incorporates significantly different technological characteristics compared to the chosen predicate—for example, a diagnostic imaging device using a novel AI/ML alg...
For a medical device company, particularly a startup, successfully navigating the FDA’s Small Business Determination (SBD) process is a critical step to manage costs associated with MDUFA user fees. S...
What performance testing is needed to prove substantial equivalence?
When preparing a 510(k) submission for a device with technological differences from its predicate—such as an electrosurgical generator featuring a modified energy delivery algorithm and a new user int...
How do I justify substantial equivalence with multiple predicate devices?
When pursuing a 510(k) submission using a 'split predicate' approach—combining key features from two or more legally marketed devices—how can a sponsor construct a robust substantial equivalence argum...
For a sponsor preparing a 510(k) for a Class II device, such as a software-enabled cardiac monitor or an integrated continuous glucose monitoring system (iCGM) under 21 CFR 862.1355, a critical challe...
What cybersecurity documentation does FDA require for a software 510k?
When preparing a 510(k) for a connected medical device, such as a networked patient monitor or a cloud-based SaMD, how can sponsors develop a cybersecurity documentation package that forms a cohesive,...
What is the difference between a 510k RTA hold and an AI request?
When a sponsor receives a hold on their 510(k) submission, how can they distinguish between a Refuse to Accept (RTA) hold and an Additional Information (AI) request, and what are the critical differen...
For manufacturers of 510(k)-exempt Class I devices, such as elastic bandages or tongue depressors, the term "General Controls" can be misleadingly simple. While these devices do not require premarket ...
What performance data does FDA require for a 510k submission?
For a Class II medical device with clear technological differences from its chosen predicate—such as an orthopedic implant with a novel biocompatible coating or an infusion pump with significant softw...
How to write a substantial equivalence argument for a 510k submission?
When preparing a 510(k) submission for a device with technological differences from its predicate—such as an infusion pump incorporating a new user interface and different patient-contacting materials...
When developing a combination product, such as an antimicrobial-coated catheter or a pre-filled injector pen, how should a sponsor definitively determine the product's Primary Mode of Action (PMOA) to...
What are the most common reasons for an FDA 510k Refuse to Accept (RTA) hold?
Beyond a surface-level check against the FDA's Refuse to Accept (RTA) checklist, what systematic, in-depth review process can a sponsor implement to proactively identify and resolve common administrat...
How do I justify substantial equivalence using multiple predicate devices?
When a sponsor develops a novel medical device by creating a hybrid system—for example, an electrosurgical device that combines a unique energy waveform from Predicate A with an advanced tissue-monito...
For a company developing a digital health product, such as a wearable sensor that analyzes sleep data, what is a robust analytical framework for determining whether the product is a regulated medical ...
What cybersecurity documentation is required for a network-connected device 510k submission?
For manufacturers of network-connected medical devices, such as a Wi-Fi-enabled patient monitor, what are the essential components of a robust cybersecurity documentation package for a 510(k) submissi...
How can a manufacturer of a lower-risk device, such as a Class I handheld diagnostic instrument or a Class II software-based patient monitoring tool, strategically implement a "right-sized" Quality Ma...