Regulatory Q&A Forum

Ask questions, share knowledge, and get help from the regulatory community

When a sponsor receives an Additional Information (AI) request for a 510(k) submission, such as for a Class II diagnostic imaging software, what is a comprehensive framework for developing a strategic...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 โœ“ ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 40 ๐Ÿ‘ 0
Asked: 5 months ago
Asked by Lo H. Khamis

When preparing a 510(k) for a 'cyber device,' such as a Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) or a network-connected monitor, how can sponsors construct a cybersecurity documentation package that provid...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 72 ๐Ÿ‘ 0
Asked: 5 months ago
Asked by Lo H. Khamis

After a sponsor submits a comprehensive response to an FDA Additional Information (AI) request for a 510(k), the review clock restarts. While this is a standard part of the process, it creates signifi...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 โœ“ ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 51 ๐Ÿ‘ 2
Asked: 5 months ago
Asked by Lo H. Khamis

When a medical device sponsor develops a novel product by combining key features from two or more legally marketed devicesโ€”such as integrating a specific sensor technology from one cleared device with...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 โœ“ ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 49 ๐Ÿ‘ 1
Asked: 5 months ago
Asked by Lo H. Khamis

When preparing a 510(k) for a modern device, such as a digital patient monitoring system, how can a sponsor establish substantial equivalence to a predicate cleared decades ago that lacks data for cur...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 26 ๐Ÿ‘ 2
Asked: 5 months ago
Asked by Lo H. Khamis

When preparing a 510(k) for a device with technological differences from its predicate, such as an orthopedic implant with a novel surface coating, how can a sponsor build a scientifically robust and ...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 42 ๐Ÿ‘ 2
Asked: 5 months ago
Asked by Lo H. Khamis

For a small medical device company aiming to qualify for the FDAโ€™s Small Business Determination (SBD) program to reduce premarket submission user fees, what are the critical steps and common pitfalls ...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 39 ๐Ÿ‘ 0
Asked: 5 months ago
Asked by Lo H. Khamis

For manufacturers of novel food ingredients, such as a new plant-based protein or a fermentation-derived flavoring agent, what are the comprehensive steps and best practices for establishing a defensi...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 34 ๐Ÿ‘ 1
Asked: 5 months ago
Asked by Lo H. Khamis

While Medical Device User Fee Amendments (MDUFA) performance goals establish a target for the number of 'FDA days' to review a 510(k) submission, regulatory project managers must plan for a 'Total Tim...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 37 ๐Ÿ‘ 1
Asked: 5 months ago
Asked by Lo H. Khamis

For medical device companies, particularly startups, how is eligibility for the MDUFA small business discount on a 510(k) user fee determined, and what are the key procedural steps and common pitfalls...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 15 ๐Ÿ‘ 1
Asked: 5 months ago
Asked by Lo H. Khamis

While the FDAโ€™s performance goal for a 510(k) review is 90 calendar days, this target often creates confusion as it only reflects the time the submission is actively under FDA review. The total time f...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 41 ๐Ÿ‘ 2
Asked: 5 months ago
Asked by Lo H. Khamis

For a sponsor developing a novel medical device, such as a Class II diagnostic Software as a Medical Device (SaMD), what are the best practices for structuring a Pre-Submission (Q-Sub) package to elic...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 35 ๐Ÿ‘ 0
Asked: 5 months ago
Asked by Lo H. Khamis

For a medical device startup planning a submission in fiscal year 2025 (which begins October 1, 2024), what are the critical strategic considerations and procedural steps for successfully obtaining Sm...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 30 ๐Ÿ‘ 0
Asked: 5 months ago
Asked by Lo H. Khamis

Beyond ensuring basic administrative requirements like correct eCopy formatting are met, what specific, high-risk documentation areas should sponsors meticulously review to prevent a 510(k) Refuse to ...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 39 ๐Ÿ‘ 0
Asked: 5 months ago
Asked by Lo H. Khamis

When preparing a 510(k) submission for a Class II device, such as an orthopedic implant or a device with software, what are the most common yet avoidable deficiencies that lead to a Refuse to Accept (...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 37 ๐Ÿ‘ 1
Asked: 5 months ago
Asked by Lo H. Khamis

How can a medical device sponsor develop a robust strategy to navigate the FDA's 510(k) Refuse to Accept (RTA) policy, moving beyond a simple checklist review to proactively prevent common administrat...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 30 ๐Ÿ‘ 0
Asked: 5 months ago
Asked by Lo H. Khamis

When a manufacturer of a 510(k)-cleared, Class II Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) plans a new software release, the decision between submitting a new 510(k) and documenting the changes via a Lette...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 65 ๐Ÿ‘ 0
Asked: 5 months ago
Asked by Lo H. Khamis

For a manufacturer of a low-risk medical device determined to be 510(k)-exempt, such as a manual surgical instrument or certain types of clinical decision support software, what are the comprehensive,...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 28 ๐Ÿ‘ 2
Asked: 5 months ago
Asked by Lo H. Khamis

A Refuse to Accept (RTA) decision from the FDA can significantly delay the 510(k) review process, often stemming from administrative or content-related omissions rather than fundamental scientific fla...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 โœ“ ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 71 ๐Ÿ‘ 1
Asked: 5 months ago
Asked by Lo H. Khamis

When preparing a 510(k), how can a sponsor craft a compelling substantial equivalence (SE) argument that thoroughly justifies the device's equivalence to a chosen predicate, particularly when there ar...

๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 โœ“ ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ 25 ๐Ÿ‘ 2
Asked: 5 months ago
Asked by Lo H. Khamis
Showing page 45 of 56 (1114 total questions)